A Brief Textual Analysis of Sections
of
The Merchant of Venice
A play-text has many, if any, meanings and we must recognize that a
text is open to multiple interpretations: some can even directly contradict
one another. What this section presents, then, is not the play's final
word on the issue of anti-semitism. Rather, what this section strives to
illustrate is how the text of Merchant echoes
some of the elements that occur in the survey of The
History of the Jews in England outlined earlier.
Those elements are:
1) the
abuse of the Jew as usurer
2) the
demonization of the Jew
3) the
image of the Jew as wanton murderer
When the abuse of the Jew as usurer is combined with the Christian
religious bias against Jewry that marked Elizabethan England, this leads
to a natural result in the demonization of the Jew. This demonization quickly
leads to the image of the Jew as a wanton murderer, and is clearly revealed
in the accusation of "blood libel" that arose against the Jews
during their year before exile from England.
In my interpretation of Shakespeare's
text, I find that The Merchant of Venice inscribes these elements,
one by one, and cumulatively stacks them up in order to define the character
of Shylock less as a man and more as a cultural image of the malignant
Jew.
A Note Against the Case for the
Humanist View of Shylock
It is often argued that the famous "hath
not a Jew eyes . . . If you prick us do we not bleed"
speech of (III, i, 59-70) stresses the common core of humanity that lurks
beneath the exterior of Shylock's public character. The fact that
Shakespeare's play affords a glimpse of the Shylock's human core supposedly
mitigates the accusations of anti-semitism. This
speech, the argument maintains, reveals kind of humanist good-will of Shakespeare
who allows his audience to see into the plight of Shylock, the persecuted
and bitter man.
I think that, on the whole, this point about
the humanity of Shylock being portrayed in the play is a good one.
Clearly, this pivotal speech creates a degree of empathy in the audience
for Shylock. However, I do not feel that one short speech of eleven lines
outweighs the far more dominate themes of Shylock's characterization in
the play. In particular, it is important to note how a mere seventeen
lines after Shylock pleads with his persecutors to recognize his humanity,
Shakespeare has Shylock ranting and raving over the elopement of his daughter
and her theft of his money. With very strong language, Shylock wishes that
his daughter "were dead at my foot and the /
Jewels in her ear! Would she were hears'd at / My foot and the ducats in
her coffin!" (III,i,88-90).
This wish for his daughter's death surely revokes
much of the sympathy that was created by the former plea for the recognition
of Shylock's humanity. In the moment of this outburst, Shakespeare again
portrays an image a malignant, murderous Jew who--in this instance-- is
willing to kill his own daughter for the sake a few ducats.
Usurer
/ Demonization
/ Murderer
Conclusion
of Textual Analysis / Index
Page / Geocities