The Post-1947 Brahmanist Order and its Ideological Foundation by Dr. G. Singh Hindu nationalism and the founding ideology of the post-1947 Poorbia Brahmanist Order are derived from historical fraud spun by late 19th-20th century Brahmanist idealogues and organizations (e.g. Vivekananda, Dayananda, Gowalker; Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj, Hindu-Maha-Saba, RSS, VHP, etc.) from the eastern subcontinent. A new supremacist identity and history (neo-Brahmanism) was invented for the Brahmanist community (the “twice born” Brahmin/Bania orthodox castes - 7% of "Hindus") by making wild, hegemonic and fraudulent claims over the history, religions and civilizations of historically separate southasian regions, nations and peoples. Under neo-Brahmanist ideology, all of southasia under British imperial rule was fantasized as their 10,000 year old “One Hindu Nation" (Hindusthan) in which the 7% Brahmanists, the self-styled "superior Aryans", should be the "rightful ruling class". With the westward expansion of the British Raj, historical propaganda and claims designed to float the Brahmanists' One Hindu Nation ambitions (really a Poorbia Brahmanist fantasy of empire - "Hindu, Hindi, Hindustan") were exported to newly annexed regions by Brahmanist ideologues, politicians, socio-political organizations and schools during the late 19th and early 20th century (e.g. Arya Samaj founded in 1877, RSS formed in 1925). The pre/post independence national politics of Brahmanist dominated political organizations, regardless of party or political affiliation, is rooted in the historical consciousness and hegemonic "One Hindu Nation" ideology and doctrines spawned by Neo-Brahmanism. The post-1947 India Union is in reality a "Casteocracy" run by the supremacist Orthodox Brahmanical Castes (OCs: Brahmins, Banias; 7% of "Hindus") or Brahmanists who came to hijack the largest chunk of the former British Indian Empire in 1947. It has been cleverly run under the ruse of "world's biggest democracy" for the past 50 years. The supremacist and hegemonic minded Brahmanist cliques completely control the circles of power and policy of the Indian state. Post 1947, almost all (95%) of the top decision-making and managerial positions in the country's administration, bureaucracy, state-run media, press, huge state-run economic sector, universities, army, police, etc. were stacked by Brahmanists who form 7% of Hindus. Intriguingly, Brahmanists did not have ruling class status or political dominance in any significant country/region of southasia before the British began creating their empire ("India") during the 19th century. According to statistics published by reputed Indian journalist and historian Kushwant Singh, the Brahmins alone (3.5% of "Hindus") control over 70% of the top decision-making and managerial posts of the Indian State. In 1935, the 3.5% Brahmins held around 4% of the officer positions among Indians in the government. By 1985, one finds that out of 3,300 Indian Administrative Officers (IAS), 2,376 are Brahmins; from the rank ofdeputy secretaries upwards, out of 500, 310 are Brahmins; of the 26 state chief secretaries, 19 are Brahmins; of the 16 Supreme Court judges, 9 are Brahmins; of 438 district magistrates, 250 are Brahmins; and so on in other circles of power and policy in the Indian state. Their state power jumps from 70% to over 90% upon including the remaining "twice born" Brahmanists. The facts show that the 7% Brahmanists monopolize the top positions of the Indian state and determine its policies and actions (e.g. Swadeshi Permit Raj Economics, nuclear testing, police/army rule and oppression in all majority non-Hindu states, systemic human right abuses of majority "lower castes" and minorities). Under "Permit Raj" and "Swadeshi" economic policies, only the Brahmanist cliques have been allowed to invest and enter the new modern and profitable industrial and manufacturing sectors while the rest of Indians (93%) are tied to the plough, dwindling lands and the unskilled labor market. The country was converted into a huge "Brahmanist milking cow" through Brahmanist monopoly over the corrupted, rent-seeking and criminalized beaurocracy, political system and state-run industries while the wealth generated in the private economy is cornered through Swadeshi Permit Raj Economics. Genocidal state terror and violence has been unleashed on the populations of every non-Hindu majority state in the Indian Union (e.g. Kashmir, Punjab, Assam, Manipur, Mizoland, Nagaland, etc.) and communal rioting against religious minorities is an integral part of statecraft and politics by the Indian Government and Brahmanist-lead political parties (1984 Sikh “riots”, Ayodhya, 1991Bombay Muslim “riots”, etc.). The Brahmanists’ despised majority (80%) "lower castes" and Dalits (untouchables) live under constant threat of random police/army violence and torture to keep them under submission and to discourage them from mobilizing politically. This is the true hideous, criminal and genocidal nature of the 50 year Casteocracy, imperialistically running the old British empire and motivated by the hegemonic, supremacist and racist socio-political ideology of neo-Brahmanism. Unfortunately, Western opinion on events in India has been largely shaped by the viewpoint of Brahmanist propagandists who control the governmental machinery/political system/academics/state-run mass media/press/etc. Brahmanists have been extremely effective in propagating their historical and political mithya and propaganda and hiding, deflecting and scapegoating India's gruesome realities and the Brahmanist regime’s abysmal failures and tyranny on their victims, lower castes and religious minorities. Brahmanist emigrees to the west have very zealously adopted the role of “Indian Ambassadors” and guardians of the honor of their dishonorable Casteocracy and perpetually cover-up its criminal, corrupted and genocidal nature and spread neo-Brahmanist doctrines and historical fraud to the outside world. Propagating the Fradulent "Hindu" Identity - the Chief Weapon of Poorbia Brahmanist Imperialism The Brahmanists came to power on the Congress elephant by deviously converting the pre-independence political debate and struggle into a communal Hindu-Muslim religious struggle and propagating their fradulent "Hindu" identity/nationalism to construct their majority Hindu flock - naturally to be lead, lorded and ruled by the "superior" 7% Brahmanists (i.e. the Brahmins/Banias clique)! This was made possible by the master stroke of Mahatama Gandhi - the Hindu nationalist cum holy sadhu - who made "Hindus" a 55% majority on paper in the 1920s upon getting the Dalits or "untouchables" (20%) dubbed as "Hindus" by the British. This coup moved the "Hindus" from 35% to a 55% majority in British India. In pre-independence India, Muslims were 25%; Sikhs/Christians/Buddhists/tribals/etc. formed the remaining 20%. This action, along with recognition of Congress as the sole political representative of all Indians in national matters, was a payoff by the British colonial authorities to the Brahmanist lead Congress and Gandhi for loyal services rendered to Queen and empire in supporting their WWI war effort; recruiting the "martial" communities (e.g. Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs, Gujars of Saka-origin) of the northwest and Muslims to go fight for the British Empire in Europe/middle east; subduing, opposing, infiltrating and sabotaging other non-Congress/non-Brahmanist lead political parties and independence movements organized at home (who saw British weakness during the war as an ideal opportunity). The 55% fraudulent "Hindu pile" was little more than a political game of Brahmanist politicians and political parties in Delhi while orthodox caste Hindus (7%) would not eat/touch/marry/socialize or even worship with their "polluted" Dalits (20% untouchables) in the 1920s. After this "victory on paper", Brahmanist politicians, political parties, and organizations totally communalized pre-independence politics along "Hindu/Muslim" religious lines of "nationhood" to get on the road to empire and Delhi. Under the historical propaganda campaign launched by Poorbia Brahmanist ideologues, organizations and schools since the late 19-20th century (e.g. "Arya" Samaj, HinduMahaSaba, RSS, etc.), the majority Saka-Vedic people of the northwest has been largely brainwashed into becoming the loyal and obedient inferior "Hindu" flock of their Brahmanist (Brahmins, Banias - 7%) masters, overlords and "Netajis". Ironically, despite all the Poorbia Brahmanist historical mithya and fantasy, the self-proclaimed "highest caste" Brahmanists cannot name and date even one ruler of the northwest over its 3500 year known history since the start of the Vedic period (1500 BC); in the 50 years since 1947, there have been 6 Brahmin Rulers! Prior to annexation by the British in the 19th century, the Sakas had regained their historical power (500 BC-1200AD) and the entire northwest and west was under Saka rule and political domination: Sikhs (Lahore, Patiala, Nabha, Kashmir), Jats (Bharatpur, Dholpur, Agra, Bhawalpur), Rajputs (Rajputana), Gujars (Gujarat, western MP), Marathas (Maharashtra). Further, the terms "Hindu" and "Hindusthan" were first imposed on southasian nations and regions by the Afghan dynasty of Ghori in the 12th century; these terms were never used in southasia prior to the Muslim era and are not even found in early (pre-12th century AD) Brahmanical or Buddhist texts. These terms and concepts have no "historical depth" in any social, religious, ethnic or national sense past the 12th century when Mohammed Ghori for the first time named his conquered domains in northern southasia "Hindusthan" and his subjects "Hindus". What did Ghori's "Hindus" call themselves prior to the 12th century? The chatur-varna ideology found in gangetic Brahmanical texts only views society in terms of "inferior and superior" castes (jatis) with separate religious, social and legal rights/privledges; there is no notion of a common religious community, nation or people in Brahmanical holy texts! According to Brahmin Law Givers, the "lower caste" Sudras (80%) were "too polluted" to be seen fit to even enter their temples, worship their devtas, and learn their religious scriptures. Their holy texts repeatedly “forbid Brahmins” from travelling to the northwest Vedic-Saka country. The region was independent from the rest of southasia over 90% of its 3500 year verifiable history and pursued its own unique and separate ethnic, historical, political, religious, linguistic, and cultural evolution. |
 |