The Effect of Music on
Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition
This
Document Originally Appeared in
NATIONAL NETWORK FOR EARLY LANGUAGE LEARNING
Volume 6, Number 3
Spring 1993
Suzanne
L. Medina, Ph.D.
School of Education
Graduate Education Department
California State University, Dominguez Hills
1000 East Victoria Street
Carson, CA 90747
Fax: (310) 514-0396
E-mail: info@forefrontpublishers.com
It
is currently a common practice to use songs in
the classroom to support second language
acquisition. The literature abounds with positive
statements concerning music as a vehicle for
first and second language acquisition. At the
same time, empirical support for music as a
vehicle for second language acquisition is
lacking and there is concern that music may be
simply a supplemental activity with little
instructional value. In this study, the
effect of music on the acquisition of English
vocabulary in a group of second grade limited-English
proficient children is reported.
Incidental
Vocabulary Acquisition
In recent years,
second language researchers have concerned
themselves with the acquisition of vocabulary and
have distinguished between vocabulary that is
acquired incidentally and vocabulary that is
acquired intentionally. During the preschool
years, children rely exclusively on the oral
language they listen to in order to acquire their
first language. This acquisition of language
takes place before children can read and without
explicit instruction of any kind. Furthermore,
even after children begin to attend school, they
continue to acquire vocabulary that has not been
learned formally. Of the 3,000 words the average
child acquires each year, only a portion is
learned as a result of the instruction received
in school. Thus, the remainder of these words
must be learned incidentally from a variety of
sources (Nagy & Herman, 1987).
There is
substantial evidence that vocabulary may be
acquired incidentally by reading or listening to
oral stories (Cohen, 1968; Elley, 1989; Eller,
Papps, & Brown, 1988). This incidental
acquisition of vocabulary is explained by Krashen
(1989) within the context and framework of his
"Input Hypothesis." According to this
hypothesis, new and unfamiliar vocabulary is
acquired when its significance is made clear to
the learner. Meaning is conveyed by providing
extralinguistic support such as illustrations,
actions, photos, and realia. This, in turn,
results in what Krashen refers to as "comprehensible
input" since the linguistic input is made
comprehensible to the second language leamer.
Krashen further states that the amount of
comprehensible input is proportionate to the
amount of vocabulary acquired. Thus, vocabulary
is incidentally acquired through stories because
familiar vocabulary and syntax contained in the
stories provide meaning to less familiar
vocabulary. Picture illustrations support the
reading process by clarifying the meaning of
unfamiliar words (Hudson, 1982; Omaggio, 1979;
Mueller, 1980; Bradsford & Johnson, 1972).
Apart from oral
stories, there may be other means of bringing
about the incidental acquisition of vocabulary.
Songs share all of the same elements of an oral
story, except that the vehicle through which the
song is conveyed is musical rather than spoken.
Furthermore, if the oral story and song are
identical, with the exception of the vehicle,
then it follows that acquisition of the song's
vocabulary may be enhanced by simultaneously
providing extralinguistic support (e.g.,
pictures, actions).
Music and
Verbal Learning
While teachers
commonly use songs in the classroom to promote
second language acquisition, empirical support
for this practice is lacking. Nonetheless, the
literature a bounds with statements regarding the
positive effects of music on first and second
language acquisition (Jalongo & Bromley, 1984;
McCarthy, 1985; Martin, 1983; Mitchell, 1983;
Jolly, 1975). There is evidence that music
benefits wrote memorization. When various
types of verbal information (e.g., multiplication
tables, spelling lists) have been presented
simultaneously with music, memorization has been
enhanced (Gfeller, 1983; Schuster & Mouzon,
1982). The literature also indicates that a
rhythmic presentation benefits memorization,
especially when the verbal information is
meaningful (Glazner, 1976; Shepard & Ascher,
1973; Weener, 1971). Music has also proven
beneficial when the objective has been to retain
the meaning of the verbal information (Isem, 1958;
Botarri & Evans, 1982).
The
psychological literature offer evidence of the
positive relationship between music and verbal
leaming. Yet, can music promote second language
acquisition as well? Can music, when coupled with
the targeted second language, promote language
acquisition to the same extent as other
traditional and nonmusical approaches (e.g., oral
stories)?
A second
question is related to the first. The
psychological literature points to the
interactive relationship between music and
meaning. That is, although meaningful
information is memorized with greater success
than less meaningful information, retention is
even greater when more meaningful verbal
information is learned with music. As has been
pointed out in the second language research,
meaning also occupies a significant role in the
acquisition of a second language. Krashen
has demonstrated that language acquisition
results when the target language item is heavily
laden with meaning. Given this, might the same
interactive relationship between music and
meaning prove beneficial for language acquisition
as it has for rote memorization?
The purpose of
this investigation was to determine:
1.
Will music bring about language acquisition
to the same extent as other more traditional
nonmusical approaches (e.g., oral stories)?
2.
Will illustrations improve vocabulary
acquisition?
3. Is
there a strong interactive relationship
between the instructional medium (music/no
music) and extralinguistic support (illustrations/no
illustrations)?
In this study,
vocabulary acquisition was investigated under
four conditions: (1) Music, (2) No Music, (3)
Illustrations, (4) No Illustrations. This study
was structured using a control group pretest-posttest
design with matching and repeated measures, a
variation of the randomized design (Isaac &
Michael, 1989).
Method
Subjects
participating in this study were 48 second-grade
Spanish speaking limited-English-proficient
students from two classrooms. All students were
enrolled in an elementary school in the Los
Angeles Unified School District during the 1990-91
academic year. The elementary school was located
in a suburb of Los Angeles that was largely low-income
and Hispanic.
Commercially
produced audiocassettes with accompanying big
book illustrations were used for this
investigation. These materials contained a song
and spoken version of A Surprise for Benjamin
Bear by Nelson (1989). This story was
selected because it conformed to a number of
criteria. At its most basic level, the story used
for this study had to be illustrated and have
tape-recorded sung and spoken versions.
Additional
criteria were also met. The story illustrations
were large, colorful, and clearly illustrated key
vocabulary in the story. The story had content
and vocabulary appropriate for second grade
children and contained at least 20 vocabulary
words that would be unfamiliar to some of the
children. The voices heard on the tapes were
clear, comprehensible, and equally appealing. The
tempo of the sung version did not prevent the
comprehension of words. The lyrics of the sung
and spoken versions were identical. The melody
used in the sung version was simple,
uncomplicated, and pleasing to the ear.
The testing
instrument designed for this study was patterned
after that used by Elley (1989) to measure the
amount of vocabulary acquired from listening to
oral stories. The instrument, used for both
pretest and posttest, consisted of a 20-item
multiple-choice paper and pencil test. Since the
subjects were exposed to oral language, written
words did not appear on the test. Instead, each
test item consisted of a target word, which was
orally presented by the investigator, and
multiple-choice options consisting of four
illustrations. The students heard a word
presented orally three times by the investigator.
Students were asked to circle the illustration
from among the four options that they believed
best matched this spoken word.
Procedure
Prior to
administering treatments four equivalent groups
were created by matching subjects on the basis of
vocabulary pretest scores. Pretest scores
belonging to all subjects were listed from lowest
to highest. The experimenter divided each list
into fourths, then randomly assigned the subjects
associated with each fourth to one of four groups.
When all students had been assigned to a group,
the groups were then randomly assigned to one of
the four treatment conditions.
The experimenter
met with teachers and made classroom visitations
to establish rapport with the children. Two days
later the vocabulary pretest was administered
followed by a four-day treatment period. During
the treatment period, tapes were played three
consecutive times. At the end of this treatment
period, the first posttest was administered,
while the second vocabulary posttest was
administered one and one-half weeks later.
All subjects
were instructed to listen to the story which was
played on the audiocassette. The Music treatment
group heard the story in its sung version while
the No Music group heard the spoken rendition of
the story (i.e., oral story). Subjects in the
Illustration treatment groups were shown large,
color illustrations of the story while listening
to the tape-recording. The words that had been
printed on each page of the storybook were
covered with strips of paper. Subjects were able
to derive the meaning of unfamiliar words from
illustrations. Subjects in the No Illustration
group were not shown illustrations; therefore,
they extracted meaning from contextual
information.
Analysis of
Data
In order to
determine the short-term and long-term effects of
music and illustrations, vocabulary acquisition
was measured prior to the treatment in the
pretest and at two additional times: at the end
of the four-day treatment period (posttest 1) and
one and one-half weeks after the last treatment (posttest
2). Consequently, the amount of vocabulary
acquired was determined by computing two
vocabulary gain scores. These compared the
pretest to posttest 1 and posttest 2. Two two-way
analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed, one
for each set of gain scores. A level of
statistical significance of .05 was set.
Results and
Discussion
The analyses of
variance revealed that the Music and No Music
treatments produced comparable amounts of
vocabulary acquisition. It follows that music
does not adversely affect second language
acquisition. Instead, it is a viable vehicle for
second language acquisition. This finding is
consistent with the statements that have been
made regarding the efficacy of music for language
acquisition (McCarthy, 1985; Jalongo &
Bromley, 1984; Martin, 1983; Mitchell, 1983;
Jolly, 1975). Consequently, results from this
investigation have succeeded in providing
empirical support for previously unsupported
statements.
The Illustration
and No Illustration treatments did not produce
statistically significant effects. The raw data,
however, did reveal a pattern: Illustration
treatment groups consistently produced higher
levels of vocabulary acquisition than No
Illustration groups, both in the short and long
term. This general pattern favoring illustrated
treatments was expected in light of the research
on comprehensible input (Krashen, 1985) and
picture illlustrations (Hudson, 1982; Omaggio,
1979; Mueller, 1980).
Although the
interaction between music and illustration was
not statistically significant, the raw data
indicated that the combination of music and
illustration consistently yielded the highest
average amount of vocabulary gain. The positive
effects produced by the combination of music and
illustrations were predicted from the psychology
literature. Several studies reported positive
effects from the combination of music and meaning
upon memory retention (Weener, 1971; Glazner,
1976; Shepard & Ascher, 1973).
Illustrations
seem to boost the effects of music, yet, could
additional extralinguistic support, beyond that
supplied by illustrations, further maximize
music? Both Cohen (1968) and Elley (1989)
demonstrated that the addition of follow-up-activities
or illustrated oral story readings resulted in
greater vocabulary acquisition. When Elley
compared illustrated oral stories with and
without vocabulary elaboration, vocabulary
acquisition was highest when additional support
was provided. Therefore, it is possible that
vocabulary gain could be increased with multiple
forms of extralinguistic support.
Implications
Findings of this
study have definite curricular implications. If
music is a viable vehicle for second language
acquisition to the same extent as other
nonmusical means, then songs can no longer be
regarded as recreational devices, having little
instructional value. Consequently, educators
might consider giving music a more prominent role
in the second language curriculum. This can
easily be accomplished by increasing the
frequency with which songs are used in the
curriculum. Not only can children benefit from
additional exposure to the second language; songs
can provide the classroom teacher with an
alternative means of promoting second language
acquisition apart from nonmusical means such as
oral stories.
References
Botarri, S.
& Evans, J. (1982). Effects of musical
context, type of vocal presentation, and time
on the verbal retention abilities of visual-spatially
oriented and verbally oriented leaming
disabled children. Journal of School
Psychology, 20(4), 324-338.
Bradsford, J.
& Johnson, M. (1972). Contextual
prerequisites for understanding: Some
investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,
11, 717-726.
Cohen, D. (1968).
The effect of literature on vocabulary and
reading achievement. Elementary English,
45, 209-217.
Eller, R.,
Papps, C., & Brown, E. (1988). The
lexical development of kindergartners:
Learning from written context. Journal of
Reading Behavior, 20(1), 5-24.
Elley, W. (1989).
Vocabulary acquisition from listening to
stories. Reading Research Quarterly,
24(2), 174-187.
Gfeller, K.
(1983). Musical mnemonics as an aid to
retention with normal and leaming disabled
students. Journal of Music Therapy, 20(4),179-189.
Glazner, M.
(1976). Intonation grouping and related words
in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 15, 8592.
Hudson, T. (1982).
The effects of induced schemata on the "short
circuit" in L2 reading: Non-decoding
factors in L2 reading performance. Language
Learning, 32, 1-31.
Isaac,S.
& Michael. (1989). Handbook in
Research and Evaluation. San Diego: EDITS
Publishers.
Isem, B. (1958).
Their fluence of music upon the memory of
mentally retarded children. Music Therapy,
58, 162-165.
Jalongo, M.
& Bromley, K. (1984). Developing
linguistic competence through song. Reading
Teacher, 37(9), 840-845.
Jolly, Y. (1975).
The use of songs in teaching foreign
languages. Modern Language Journal, 59(1),
11-14.
Krashen, S.
(1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and
In Wlications. New York: Longman Group
Limited.
Krashen, S.
(1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by
reading: Additional evidence for the input
hypothesis Modern Language journal, 73(4),440-464.
Martin, M. (1983).
Success! Teaching spelling with music. Academic
Therapy, 18(4),505-506.
McCarthy, W.
(1985). Promoting language development
through music. Academic Therapy, 21(2),
237-242.
Mitchell, M.
(1983). Aerobic ESL: Variations on a total
physical response theme. TESL Reporter,
16, 23-27.
Mueller, G.
(1980). Visual contextual cues and listening
comprehension: An experiment. Modern
Language Journal, 64, 335-340.
Nagy, W.
& Herman, P. (1987). Breadth and depth of
vocabulary knowledge: Implications for
acquisition and instruction. In McKeown &
M. Curtiss (Eds.), The Nature of
Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 19-35).
Hillsdale: Erlbaum Publishers.
Nelson, J. (1989).
A Surprise for Benjamin Bear.
Cleveland: Modem Curriculum Press.
Omaggio, A.
(1979). Pictures and second language
comprehension: Do they help? Foreign
Language Annals, 12, 107-116.
Schuster, D.,
& Mouzon, D. (1982). Music and vocabulary
leaming. Journal of the Society for
Accelerative Learning and Teaching, 7(1),
82-106.
Shepard, W.,
& Ascher, L. (1973). Effects of
linguistic rule conformity on free recall in
children and adults. Developmental
Psychology, 8(1), 139.
Weener, P. (1971).
Language structure and free recall of verbal
messages by children. Developmental
Psychology, 5, 237-243.
Copyright © 2000 Suzanne L. Medina. All rights
reserved. No part of this document may be copied
or reproduced in any form or by any means,
photocopying or otherwise, without written
permission. Exception: Teachers may duplicate
these materials as long as the copyright symbol
and statement appear on all copies made. Fax: (310)
514-0396. E-Mail: info@forefrontpublishers.com.
|