Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 14:32:25 -0700 From: spooner@doitnow.com (Rick Tompkins/Kathy Harrer) Subject: [lpaz-repost] The Latest Waco Fireball To: lpaz-repost@yahoogroups.com
The Latest Waco Fireball http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=460 Thu Apr 5 14:36:19 2001
The Latest Waco Fireball
by James Bovard
The Waco ghost may be rising from the grave once more to place its ice-cold hand again on the neck of the Washington establishment. A new film and a new book by top Waco experts achieve the miraculous -- further shredding government credibility on the FBI's April 19, 1993 attack on the Branch Davidians.
Back in September 1999, Attorney General Janet Reno hand-picked establishment eminence and former U.S. Senator John Danforth (R-MO) to put the wooden stake in the heart of the Waco issue once and for all. Danforth, operating supposedly as an independent counsel, did his pious best -- and raced to release his report last summer just as rumor had it that he was a to prospect to be Bush's vice presidential candidate. Danforth basically exonerated the feds, saving his scorn for low-life Americans who dared criticize the government tank assault and gassing of the women, children, and men in the Davidians' home.
A key issue in Danforth's investigation was whether FBI agents fired on Davidians during the final attack. Rhythmic patterns on Forward Looking Infrared ("FLIR") tapes made from an FBI plane strongly suggested automatic weapons fire came from positions near the FBI tanks. Danforth persuaded federal Judge Walter Smith to conduct a re-enactment last year of the final day's action. Danforth then proclaimed that the film from the re-enactment proved beyond a doubt that federal agents did not shoot at Davidians -- in large part because the muzzle flashes on the re-enactment were much shorter than the shots from the April 19, 1993 tape.
A new film, entitled "The F.L.I.R. Project," produced by Mike McNulty (one of the masterminds behind the 1998 Academy Award finalist documentary, "Waco: Rules of Engagement") reveals fatal flaws in Danforth's re-enactment. (The film is available at www.flirproject.com)
On April 19, 1993, FBI agents relied on a commercial, off-the-shelf ammo -- the type that would be used by any hunter or shooter. For the March 19, 2000 Danforth-FBI re-enactment, however, the FBI used military-issue ammunition that had a special chemical coating on the gunpowder to reduce muzzle flash (helpful in preventing soldiers being detected in combat). The militaryammo thus had a built-in flash suppressant.
Since a key issue was the length of the muzzle flashes, using flash-suppressing ammunition ensured that the re-enactment would be a farce.
The Danforth-FBI re-enactment further biased the test results by having the FBI agents use weapons with a 20-inch barrel -- instead of weapons with 14-inch barrels which agents carried on April 19, 1993. The longer a weapon's barrel, the less muzzle flash will be shown from each shot.
Again, this is a tricky way to do an accurate re-enactment. But the re-enactment produced the result that Reno and Danforth sought -- and Danforth proceeded to denounce the American people for thinking bad things about their federal masters.
No doubt Danforth, the FBI, and others will continue to insist that there was no gunfire by FBI agents on April 19, 1993. But if the feds are innocent, why have they gone to such absurd lengths to fix the jury? The $12 million in tax dollars that Danforth spent for his Waco investigation should have been categorized as prt of the public relations budget of the FBI and Justice Department -- or perhaps as a line item expense in the Clinton Legacy Project.
These revelations come on top of information that has already surfaced showing the Danforth investigation to be a sham. Danforth personally chose Vector Data Systems to carry out the tests, with U.S. military assistance, and to evaluate the results. Danforth repeatedly identified Vector as independent British company. But Vector is actually owned by Anteon, a large American corporation that on its webpage boasts of contracts with 50 federal agencies, including the White House Communications Agency.
A new book by former federal attorney David Hardy further batters the government's Waco fairy tale. This Is Not An Assault provides fascinating inside details on how private investigators squeezed out damning information on Waco -- how federal judge Walter Smith stifled lawyers at the trial last year to prevent jurors from learning of over a hundred items of evidence embarrassing to, or potentially incriminating, the federal government -- and how Republican congressmen (such as Dan Burton) and aides cowered and effectively aided the Clinton administration cover-up. Hardy's skill in hammering federal agencies with Freedom of Information Act requests was a decisive factor in making Waco a hot political potato in 1999. (Hardy's book will be soon available at www.Xlibris.com)
If President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft want to restore the faith of the American pople in the federal government, they must open the vaults on Waco. The cover-up continues -- almost eight years after the final fire of Waco. Neither Bush nor Ashcroft should have any incentive to cover up the outrages of Reno and other Clinton administration officials. On the other hand, if Bush and Ashcroft do not have the will or gumption to force the FBI, the ATF, and the Justice Department to come clean about Clinton era abuses, what hope can we have of their honesty regarding any abuses occurring after January 20?
James Bovard is the author of "Feeling Your Pain": The Explosion & Abuse of Government Power in the Clinton-Gore Years (St. Martin's Press). To purchase the book, click here.
(Posted 4/5/01) http://www.spectator.org/campaign/bovard/bovard.htm
ho was responsible for the deaths of the Branch Davidians on April 19, 1993 at Waco? The government claims the Davidians committed mass suicide by gunshot and by fire. But in two acclaimed documentaries "Waco: The Rules of Engagement" and "Waco: A New Revelation inependent experts saw gunfire pouring into Mt. Carmel from the outside, gunfire that would have prevented the Davidians from fleeing the burning building. Janet Reno appointed a Special Counsel to discover the truth. His conclusion: allegations against the government are false; no federal agent fired a weapon on that fateful day.
In "The F.L.I.R. Project" Emmy Award winning investigative journalist Michael McNulty proves that the Special Counsel was wrong! This powerful film demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that federal agents fired into Mt. Carmel as men, women and children were burning to death inside the building. It is an unflinching indictment of the government and its continuing cover-up.
PRODUCED AND DIRECTED BY Michael McNulty http://www.flirproject.com/index3.html
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Get great low international calling rates from Net2Phone! Click Here! http://us.click.yahoo.com/pOl7zD/kJXCAA/4ihDAA/JwNVlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Community email addresses: Post message: lpaz-repost@onelist.com Subscribe: lpaz-repost-subscribe@onelist.com Unsubscribe: lpaz-repost-unsubscribe@onelist.com List owner: lpaz-repost-owner@onelist.com Web site: www.ArizonaLibertarian.org
Shortcut URL to this page: http://www.onelist.com/community/lpaz-repost
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/