HERESIES ADOPTED BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH....THOSE WHO GAVE YOU THE NEW TESTAMENT NO LESSConstantly we at Bet Emet are not understood when being critical of much of what the New Testament teaches. We understand such misunderstanding because most of our readers have not had the opportunity to read and study to the level we have over the last 15 years where we discovered much that forced we make changes in our religious belief system. Simply we found, based upon our studies, that much of the New Testament, especially in doctrinal positions, was a replacement of the actual beliefs of a Rabbi named Yeshua who lived in the first century. A cursory reading of the New Testament does not always provide such an understanding, for most read it as if it is “inspired, infallible, and inerrant.” Upon just a little personal study into this area and when using good sources one quickly can see that they have deceived in this crucial area of their life. Understand such a false trust and belief in the New Testament by most Christians today is not based upon the reader’s individual study, but rather upon the hearsay he has picked up by listening to others express such trust in the New Testament. The sad fact of the matter is that those who say such things have never done their homework to the depth necessary to see the problems inherent in accepting the New Testament as authoritative. The New Testament was never meant to be a replacement book for the Jewish Scriptures, but sadly has become that today for the vast majority of non-Jewish believers in God. Doctrine, when found in the New Testament, to be true must conform to the Word of God.....THE OLD TESTAMENT: "To the law and to the testimony; if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." (Isaiah 8:20) Answer for yourself: Do you believe the above statement by Isaiah the prophet? If you do not, then you need to read no further for this study will not have benefit you for you since you have in reality no substance for your authority. One then believes what he wants and not what was intrusted to Holy men of old preserved and handed down to others who paved the way for the Messiah to come. Thus if we find doctrines in the New Testament which contradict the Jewish Scriptures...such doctrines are to be understood as fables and lies. To fail to do so contradicts Isaiah the Prophet as well as Moses.Before you read the following...understand that those who gave you the following man-made doctrines are the same ones who gave you the NEW TESTAMENT that has ended up replacing the Bible Jesus used…the Old Testament as taken from the Jewish Tankah (the true Masoretic Text).Can we trust the Holy Spirit to have led these early anti-Semitic Catholics into all truth, and should we trust their collection of writings called the New Testament when they, in many places, contradict Moses and Jesus?We at Bet Emet cannot, and we offer no man apologies.Just understand that when you read the NT, with all its additions, purposeful misquotes of the Jewish Scriptures, changes, deletions and doctrinal creationism over the early centuries of the Gentile Church, these were the doctrines behind the men who did it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UNDERSTANDING THE ABOVE INFORMATIONAnswer for yourself: If you have difficulty in accepting these above heresies as truth, then why do you accept their other beliefs hidden within the New Testament that violate the Laws, the Prophets and the Writings? This knowledge as given in the above chart alone should at least make one suspicious that other such "heresies" might be contained within the New Testament which you might not at present be aware. This should spur you into your own personal study to find out if such things be so. Believe us at Bet Emet, they are there hidden beneath the contexts of many events which are displayed in the New Testament which are simply unhistorical and can be proven to be in violation of facts and evidence of history which will prove them wrong upon study. Answer for yourself: If you have difficulty in accepting these above heresies as truth, then why would you accept their other beliefs cleverly contained in the New Testament which, without through knowledge of the Old Testament, will not be noticed as fraudulent in simple reading of the New Testament? The Roman Church says it never changes; yet, it has done nothing else but invent new doctrines which are contrary to the Bible and the original belief system of Yeshua, and has practiced rites and ceremonies taken bodily from paganism. Some scholar has found that 75% of the rites and ceremonies of the Roman Church are of pagan origin. We trust that you desire to be a follower of Jesus/Yeshua more than a follower of your Denomination or Church and its inherited traditions! Don't look now my Protestant friends because much of what you practice in your church comes from these pagan background...and most of you are not aware! THE EARLY CHURCH FATHERS INCRIMINATE THEMSELVES AND THE GENTILE CHRISTIAN FAITH...AND I BET YOU NEVER KNEW THIS...DID YOU?In Seminary I remember looking at the Library shelves that supported the multiple volumes of the Ante-Nicean Fathers. I beheld thousand and thousands of pages of their writings. I even amused myself that to read and understand such a large volume of literature would take years. It did! What I came to admire about such writings is when you read enough of them you find that these "pro-Christian" writers often incriminated themselves with what they wrote. The following examples are for your benefit. JUSTIN MARTYREusebius, in his Church History, tells us that Justin, in his Dialogue with Trypho, says "there exists not a people, civilized or semi-civilized, who have not offered up prayers in the name of a crucified Savior to the Father and Creator of all things" (Hist. Eccl. lib i. ch. iv). The honesty of Justin Martyr as portrayed here is the heart of the subject matter of these web pages. I intend to show you that from the beginning of time the pagan nations had their "crucified Sun-gods" and much recorded about Jesus of Nazareth in the New Testament is nothing more than the "re-telling" of the same Sun-Myths; the only difference is that now they are applied to the life of Jesus the Jew. Do you want the truth before you die? Then keep reading. EUSEBIUSEusebius says that "the names of Jesus and Christ were both known and honored by the ancients" (Hist. Eccl. lib. i. ch. iv). How could this be? Eusebius, the great champion of Christianity, admits in his book: "that which is called the Christian religion is neither new nor strange, but-if it be lawful to testify the truth-was known to the ancients" (Hist. Eccl. lib. 2, ch. v.). How could this be? Eusebius, who is our chief guide for the early history of the Church, confesses that he was by no means scrupulous to record the whole truth concerning the early Christians in the various works which he has left behind him (Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., ch. viii. p. 21). Edward Gibbon, speaking of Eusebius says: "The gravest of the ecclesiastical historians, Eusebius himself, indirectly confesses that he has related what might rebound to the glory, and that he has suppressed all that could tend to the disgrace, of religion. Such an acknowledgment will naturally excite a suspicion that a writer who has so openly violated one of the fundamental laws of history has not paid a very strict regard to the observance of the other; and the suspicion will derive additional credit from the character of Eusebius, which was less tinctured with credulity, and more practiced in the arts of courts, than that of almost any of his contemporaries" (Gibbon, Rome, vol. ii., Philadelphia, 1876). SAINT AUGUSTINEAugustine is quoted as saying: "That in our time is the Christian Religion, which to know and follow is the most sure and certain health, called according to that name, but not according to the thing itself, of which is the name; for the thing itself which is now called the Christian Religion really was known to the ancients, nor was wanting at any time from the beginning of the human race until the time when Christ came in the flesh, from whence the true religion, which had previously existed, began to be called "Christian;" and this in our days is the Christian religion, not as having been wanting in former times, but as having in later times received this name" (Opera Augustini, vol. i. p. 12; quoted in Taylor's Diegesis, p. 42). Now if you read these quotes you have to admit that they are very troubling to the contemporary Christian. I always heard: "Where there is smoke there is fire" [pardon the pun please]. If you find the courage to look beyond these quotes then you will find the kindling used for the paganization of Christianity by the Gentile Church whereby it become little more than another manifestation of Sun Worship. Jesus know the difference and you should as well. TERTULLIANTertullian, one of the Christian Fathers (A.D. 200), originally a Pagan, and at one time Presbyter of the Christian Church in Africa, reasons in the following manner on the evidences of Christianity: "I find no other means to prove myself to be impudent with success, and happily a fool, than by my contempt of shame, - as, for instance, I maintain that the Son of God was born. Why am I not ashamed of maintaining such a thing? Why, but because it is itself a shameful thing. I maintain that the Son of God died. Well, that is wholly credible, because it is monstrously absurd. I maintain that after having been buried he rose again; and that I take to be mainly true, because it was manifestly impossible" (Taylor, Diegesis, p. 326). For example, early Church Father Tertullian (160-220 C.E.), an "ex-Pagan" and Bishop of Carthage, ironically admits the true origins of the Christ story and of all other such god-men by stating in refutation of his critics, "You say we worship the sun; so do you" (Wheless, Forgery in Christianity, p. 147). Interestingly, a previously strident believer and defender of the faith, Tertullian later renounced Christianity. (Wheless, Forgery in Christianity, p. 147). Cardinal Newman, in his book, The Development of the Christian Religion, admits that ... "Temples, incense, oil lamps, votive offerings, holy water, church holidays and season of devotions, processions, blessing of fields, sacerdotal vestments, the tonsure (of priests and monks and nuns), images ... are all of pagan origin..." (Page 359). HERESIES are those doctrines and practices which are contrary to the Bible. They are also called "human traditions" or "doctrines of men". Both Peter predicted and warned that in the later times "false teachers" would rise within the Church and bring in "damnable heresies" and "doctrines of devils". (Read II Peter 2:1-3). Jesus rebuked the Pharisees, for they transgressed the commandments of God by keeping their traditions. "in vain," He said, [speaking in the first person representing the Father] "they worship me by keeping for doctrines the commandments of men" (Matt. 15:3,9). The testimony of their heresies can be found in much of the New Testament today which did not even become recognized until the fourth century. The Word of God commands us to get out of Idolatry and pagan expressions of religious faith. All true "Christians" SHOULD desire to be faithful to the religion of Jesus as taught in the Jewish Bible.....the Jewish Scriptures...the Jewish Tanakh, and many of them can can still be detected within the New Testament with a little study. However, so much more is alien to what the true Yeshua both believed and practiced. Now is the time to study. I hope you take the challenge. Your rewards are eternally waiting....will you merit them? |
Heresies adopted by the roman catholic church |