the_truth_jew

Often, while being awake all night and contemplating the historical events taught to me as a child growing up in a predominately Christian community, I often ponder in amazement the directions we are still taking, and embracing a religious practice, which for over 600years, have decimated, demoralized, misled, murdered, dehumanized, and debased, all the people of color, the 75% percent of the planets population, under the coercive direction of the 25% or less, of albino (caucasian) stock. We were forced to accept precepts from a religious document, doctored by people of albino descent, to portray their, specific blood line, as the epitome of modern civilization, when in fact all their precepts were stolen, from the ancients, who were themselves decimated, or dehumanized to believe that all their beliefs and cultures were of satanic and pagan origin, they were ripped from there family, forced into despicable living conditions, forced to embrace engineered religious practices akin to nothing they had never been exposed to previously, without choice, and under the threat of death, and or mutilation, they conformed bore, and accepted the abuse, without even physically retaliating to the conditions imposed upon them by their then masters.

But Today, after all this time and after so much truth has been brought to light, through scientific discovery and archeology, I am dumbfounded to understand, why people of color are still embracing those hideous religious practices which had for centuries, enslaved and decimated their culture, how dumb can any one be? or may be we have been so brain washed, that we can't ever except the truth that all the 75% of the WORLD'S people of color were supernaturally engineered by the CREATOR YHVH himself, and not the ruling 25% who were of genetic mutation and of caucasian stock.

The truth is that two people of color, can in fact produce an offspring of caucasian characteristic, i.e. white skin and blue eyes, (albino) but no two caucasian, no matter what their blood line, can ever produce and offspring of Negroid {Hue complexion} interestingly from which the word Hueman or human was derived.

Findings from recent research indicate that during the late stone age, languages, most likely to be precursors to the Afroasiatic Superfamily, existed in modern-day Eritrea and Sudan. While not definite, these languages first began to take their "separate" forms by 13,000 BCE, which is probably when the Omotic precurser-language began its slow migration southward in the Ethiopian region. Today, Omotic speakers live in the west and southwest part of the country.

Not too long afterward, the Cushitic language-precursor group were also in formation. The speakers of this language originally inhabited what is today northern Ethiopia and Eritrea, and slowly migrated westwards into the Sudan, further eastwards into eastern Ethiopia and northern Somalia, and southward into north-central Ethiopia (Gondar, Gojjam and Wallo).

The Semitic family can also trace their origins from this area in north-eastern Africa. Most modern experts hold the theory that the Semitic precursor-language must have at first existed in a cluster with ancient Egyptian and Berber, before exiting into its unique form. However the timing for these events is quite difficult to discern. The Semitic language-precursor being, for our purposes, the "last" language in formation, was somehow transported into Arabia and further east into central and northern Asia.

The early inhabitants of Ethiopia during the Chalcolithic Age (6200-3000 BCE) were in the beginning stages of domesticating grains such as teff and ansete (locally known as the false banana). Plough-based agriculture was also in the process of evolving, which could imply the domestication of cattle. Certainly by the Early Bronze Age (3000 BCE), the domestication of animals, including cattle, sheep, goats, and donkeys was taking place

ported to Babylonia, following the capture of Jerusalem by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BCE (Ezekiel: 37:21-23).

It is with a kind of awareness and shock, I have come to accept what, I have always felt as the ultimate truth, and though most of the information has come from our albino brothers and sisters, I am dumbfounded to understand, that given all the knowledge, and preferential treatment, from the almighty YHVH, how could we with our superior knowledge and guidance, allow freaks and mutants to over take and control all the resources which was handed down to us on a silver platter. I guess it must be because we were not equipped with enough aggressive and destructive genes to perform such an inhuman task, and so we allowed, descendants of an albino, outcast race, who groveled in caves for the longest while to descend on us unsuspecting and over come, steal, and demolish a way of life, which was engineered by the almighty and given to us for all time. Our disobedience and sinful nature, allowed us to move away from the, commandments and precepts of the almighty, which allowed a Godless sinister, heartless, and Gentile race of albino, discolored descendents to, control abuse, and steal from us our birth right.

The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, our fore fathers, had equipped us with all the knowledge to succeed and to serve him, in a manner appropriate to the God head, instead we chose to follow alien designs of our outcast brethren, who had spent so much time in the darkened recesses of the northern caves and grotto's that YHVH was forced to abandon us and leave us to our own chosen self inflicted demise.

Today we have still learned very little from generations of abuse, and deception, we still follow the dictates of a repulsive albino races, bent on destroying all the wonderful balance of our planet, which was lovingly engineered by YHVH. We have thrown caution to the wind, and abandoned all the teachings of Tenach, to embrace a life stile bent on depleting and destroying the environment created by YHVH, subverting the morality and teachings of the sages of old, and instead embracing the disgusting life stile of albino media personalities, through television and radio. Even our beloved successful worldly sisters have jumped on the albino band wagon, of moral decay and degeneracy. But YHVH has promised in Tenach, that HE/SHE will return to eliminate our sufferings, so we just have to wait, and live with hope, knowing with all certainty that what YHVH says HE will do.

There was a time that religious teachers and members of a misguided and misinformed Hebrew populace, thought that, the albino descendants were in reality descendants of the Adam Eve allegory, but with time, science and the archeological findings have proved all this wrong, It has all been the deceptive practices of an albino race, trying to assume dominance through the portrayal of superiority through acquired knowledge, a knowledge stolen from the ancients, in increments of understanding available at the then time of acquisition, The archives which were beyond their comprehension, was destroyed and or hidden from the populace, for thousands of years,

But Today with the advances in science and technologies, many thousands of years, over due, we are beginning to learn of the deceptions lies and fabrications of an albino race, that have taken credit for every thing and every one of importance on this planet.

The descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, had been performing, medical procedures, which are still alien to modern medicine, the Aztecs of the south American continent, had been performing brain surgeries, and possible space travel long before the albino descendants were even versed in simple communication skills, which they have presently taken credit for like all other improvements and discoveries in medicine, science and technology

Presently we are moving into an era of, unmasking lies and the deceptions of the past. In a little while all will be exposed, to the public at large, both albino and Children of the most HIGH, will become aware, and embrace a heritage, given freely, whether we want it or not

The search for truth is often mired in confusion, deception, lies, engineered by the educators and members of the governing establishment, to the demise of the ordinary citizens and the G-D fearing public at large. And for many centuries, this is exactly what has been happening to planet earth, and the inhabitants there off. we have put our complete trust in the belief handed down by unscrupulous educators, with the help of the only article of truth called the bible, instead of teaching the truths, portrayed by allegories, stories and historical events., we have been forced to accept a book copied by deceivers, changed and maligned to support their own agendas, bent on the manipulation and subversion of truth, in order to control the masses, who are to ignorant, and complacent, to seek out the answers. Thanks to the advent of computers, and archaeology, we may yet discover, what it is that YHVH really intended us to know and become in order to serve him.

Now since the beginning is always the best place to start, lets go to the book of genesis

so we must then assume that the first day, began with genesis 1:1-5 now hear this

now how do you decipher the difference, between the first and the fourth day when it says here that the sun and moon were not created until the fourth day well that could be construed as the first 24 hour day,,,and leaves the rest to speculation and here say, meaning that until the fourth day, we cant know for certain what the time line for the first three days were, only G-d s involvement can explain this complicated historical event. But I am sure every biblical scholar will have his own views on the matter, Question is this really important for us to know, I don't think so, there are more important things we could be doing to make this planet a better home for our brothers/sisters.

Taken from the manuscripts of brothers for truth can be found on the web, but here it is outlined without all the advertising and media components.They are( I )

PanAfrica: Common Ancestor, One African "Eve" for All World's People Portrayed

In a television documentary scheduled for airing on the Discovery Channel this Sunday, humankind is said to share a common genetic link that can be traced to one woman who lived in Africa more than 150,000 years ago. Using a unique part of human DNA called mitochondrial DNA" which is passed from mother to daughter, "The Real Eve", narrated by actor Danny Glover, tracks the movement of humanity from this common ancestor across geography and millennia. AllAfrica's Charles Cobb Jr. spoke with the film's producer, Paul Ashton. Excerpts:

We should start with the science and the point the film is trying to make. Can you explain this in layman's terms? DNA? The "real" Eve?

The point of the film is to tell a story about the movement of people, where we came from and how we got to where we are now. And the new genetics are able to tell us how we got to where we've got now. And where we moved to and through. So Mitochondrial DNA, which is the maternal line carried by everyone - its the DNA of the mitochondria - becomes key. Mitochondria are like little batteries that energize everybodys' cells. They have their own DNA which you can trace. Men cannot pass it on, only women. The mitochondrial drops off the sperm as it enters the egg. Every so often there is a very small harmless mutation which doesn't effect anything other than that scientists can read it; they can see the mutation. Basically they can see which mutation came first. So every mutation is layered on the previous one. It's always passed on exactly as it is. And where there is a split in the mutation you can tell that is where populations must have split. If somebody carries the same mutation up to a certain point along with another population and then suddenly they are carrying a new mutation which that other population no longer carries you know that group must have left before that second mutation.

And these mutations would be what? Color? Hair? Body features?

No. Nothing to do with us. Mutation is a word that always conjures up that sort of thing but it's actually a marker. It has no effect whatsoever because it's within the midochondria. And it's just something that we can see but it has no effect. It has no relation to our color or height or our eyes or anything like that at all.

Okay. This sounds like interesting science, but a film? What in this science leads you to a film?

Well, the film is about our human journey. Everybody on the planet carries the midochondrial DNA of one woman who lived 150 thousand years ago in Africa.

Where in Africa?

We think in East Africa. Archaeologically we know that. You can't tell that from genetics. Archaeologically we know pretty well that we came from the southern end of the great Rift Valley. Also, the genetic markers around that area are numerous too, so that's the most likely place that we arise from as well.

I do have to tell you that although I am telling this story, the reason I am able to tell this story is because I have done a lot of work on it over there last two years, but I am not a scientist. There is no way that I can explain all of the technical, academic details. So basically we know that we all carry the genetic marker of one woman who lived over 150,000 years ago in Africa, but then we talk about how did human beings first leave Africa and where did they go to then. Well, because of the genetic tracing we know that everybody outside Africa carries a mitochondrial marker of one woman who must have been in a group of people who left Africa about 80,000 years ago. And we know that group was a group of anything from about 250 to 700 people. We think it's about 250. Less than 250 wouldn't have been able to sustain a population and much more than 500 or 600 people would have taken too long for it to drift down to one line because they have to stay together. We also know that it was one group that left once. It wasn't a stream of people. It wasn't lots of groups leaving at different times. It had to be one group once because it all comes down to one line. For example, if you take a small remote Italian village you will find that a lot of the people in the village carry the same name. That's over time, because some people just have daughters. You drift down to one name. In same way you drift down from one line. So there might have been lots of lines coming out of Africa in this one group but because they stayed together sufficiently long enough they all drifted down to one line.

Which you can tell from the genetic marker?

That's right. That line then became the "mother", if you like, of everybody outside Africa. And then they started to split off. Some went down to Australia; some went up into Central Asia; some went up into Europe - carrying their own markers from that point. So it's rather like the branches of a tree with the main trunk of the branch being in Africa.

And the film shows this? Documents this?

It trys to tell the story in a dramatic way because we want people to understand the science but we also want people who aren't particularly turned on by science to also be able to enjoy the film on an entertaining level and be involved in the story of "us." We want people to be able to look at the screen wherever they are, whoever they are - whatever color they are, whatever creed they come from - to look at that screen and say this is our story. It's not these strange people who lived thousands of years ago. This is a story of our forebears.

PanAfrica: Common Ancestor, One African "Eve" for All World's People Portrayed

Do you have a favorite part of the film, or a part that you consider especially important in the sense of what you want to convey to the viewer?

The part of the film that moves me most is the death of the little boy when he falls over and his father carries him and buries him. He died 44,000 years ago. From his skeleton we recreate that scene. It shows a caring side of humanity. This little boy was obviously damaged because he has a broken skull and he was laid very carefully in this recess a cave and was obviously buried with care and love and I think that a parent's love for a child is what really the human race is about. And the only problem is, is that we don't seem to be able to care that much about "other" people's children.

You've said that you're not a scientist, and certainly not a specialist in this area, so how did you, the filmmaker, encounter this piece of science? How did you get engaged?

I read a book written by professor Stephen Oppenheimer who is the professor in this film. We are telling his synthesis. He's the man who came up with the scientific end of this. I was talking with him about this other book he had written with the view of trying to make a film out of it and he told me this story that everybody outside of Africa comes from one small group and that everybody on the planet is related to one woman. And I thought that was just an extraordinary thing. And I said this would make a beautiful film, a lyrical film, which is what I wanted to do.

Let me ask you again, getting back to the actual story, Why did this group of people leave in the first place? And where did they go?

Obviously that's conjecture, but we believe that they were beach combing. And we have proof of modern humans beach combing along that particular coast of Africa about 80,000 years ago. At that particular time there was a major freeze up of the world and the world became much drier. And also because of the shallowness of the Red Sea that would have become very, very salty. So whatever they were eating while they were beach combing would have been dying off. Just across the water from where they were you have Yemen, which was at the time was being hit by some freak monsoon weather and it was very green and also it was on the ocean side, so the water wouldn't have been so salty. It must have looked very tempting for them. Such a short distance away, green inviting hills. They were standing on this rather deserted desert lacking food. That's why we think they made this trek across the water.

And then from Yemen they go North, South...where?

From Yemen they went to the Gulf of Arabia which at the time was dry because sea levels were so much lower. The gulf was actually fresh water lakes; it wasn't the gulf as we know it today. So it was a very good place for them to stop. Some of them went all the way round the coast all the way down to Australia and then all the way up the coast to China. Some of them went North of the Himalayas into Central Asia. Some 30,000 years after they got to the Gulf, they then went North into Europe because the weather changed again, opening up a green corridor from where they were in the Gulf up into Turkey. There was some wet weather that greened the desert. this is why they didn't get into Europe until 50,000 years ago.

This charting of the routes seems pretty precise.

Yes it is pretty precise. If you're carrying a marker - up to a certain point if a population is carrying a marker up to a certain point - and then beyond that point that marker isn't there you know which direction the people are moving. So you can say, well at this point there must have been a split because the marker then goes over there and the new marker happens over here. It's a split in the branch; you have two more twigs.

This is what was so wonderful about the end of the film. You had two people from opposite ends of the world carrying the same marker. There was a Greek lady, Angela, who was a recent immigrant into America from Europe. And then there was a native American who was a full-blooded Cree. And we tested them and we found that they both carried quite a rare marker in their mitochondrial DNA which is called "X" for no other reason than that's the letter that the scientists gave it. Now "X" first came into being in Central Asia about 30,000 years ago. So what it means is, that one of the daughters of our out of Africa "Eve" had a mutation that we call "X". Her familiy then split. Part of her family went West towards Europe and part of her family went East toward Siberia and then on into America and became the Native Americans. So when Angela came to the United States from Europe and she met with Leonard in our laboratory it meant two members of the family were rejoined 30,000 years later.

Leonard was completely blown away. But it doesn't change the fact that he is Native America. He can still be part of the first people of North America. We're going back 30,000 years and we know that human beings didn't get into North America until about 20,000 years ago so his family could have been part of that first group. What it does do is prove that we all come from the same place, that we're all brothers and sisters. We really are, not just in a moral sense, but actually in a physical sense. People better get used to the idea.

PanAfrica: Common Ancestor, One African "Eve" for All World's People Portrayed

It's important to understand that this is taking place over thousands of years....

Thousands of years. You're not talking about a couple of generations; you're talking about 5,000 generations.

And I assume that in addition to moving they are changing in the sense of physical characteristics in order to adapt to various climates that they find themselves in, and I suppose developing languages as well

Yes, they are changing. Absolutely correct although they might well have had language before. In fact we know that they did because they possessed the hyoid bone which is a bone in the throat which enables us to talk. We know that Neanderthals and homo Erectus and early hominids had the hyoid bone so we know that they talked as well. So we had speech.

But we're not talking about primitive people here.

This is modern man.

This is modern man! One hundred and fifty thousand years ago this woman who was our genetic "Eve", if you like, had all the capabilities that we have today. And all the potential. She was just like us! If we were to bring her to this time, educate her, dress her up and walk her down the street you would not know the difference. We are not talking about primitive early people who dragged their knuckles on the ground!

Is this "new" in the sense of science? Is this a breakthrough or has this been around?

That aspect of it isn't new. The early Mitochondrial Eve "mother" is not new. That has been around in scientific circles. But what is new is the out of Africa group that left once; the way they left which was the southern route across the mouth of the Red Sea, and also the movement from the Gulf into Europe 50,000 years ago. That is all brand new.

Is it controversial?

It is controversial. But only because some people don't like other people to get things right. But people are very very quickly coming to realize that this is something they can no longer argue with. Professor Stephen Oppenheimer, whose synthesis we filmed, was the first person to come up with these aspects because he looked at all the information, not just the genetic information. He looked at the oceanography, at the climate; he looked at all the things that were happening and came up with these explanations which have now been argued about for a little while but have held up.

A Response: PBS "Race": A History Of Racism

by Paul Barton
Sun, 04 May 2003

RACE IS A NATURAL FACT IN PHYSICAL TERMS AND A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT AS WATUSIS ARE PHYSICALL DIFFERENT FROM ESKIMOS AND AS IRISH SERVANTS OF THE 18TH CENTURY WERE SYSTEMATICALLY OPPRESSED AND MADE AS "INFERIOR" AS SLAVES OF THE SAME PERIOD

AFRICAN-CENTERED SCHOLARS MUST LAY THE FACTS OUT IN THE OPEN AND ARE DOING SO

In order for one to understand the nature of Anglo-Saxon racism and its effects on present-day Africans/Negroids around the world, or the effect of sanctified racism in India, Sudan and West Papua and its effect today, one has to also study the English system of servitude, surfdom and servant/master (as in Manor House) relationships.

The fact is, racism grew out of a system that was established in England and parts of Europe during the Middle Ages, when Africans/Black Moors began to fall out of favor from being a highly respected and accomplished people, to being reduced to slavery after Ferdinand and Isabella retook Spain from the Black Moors and Arabs.

From this point onward, religious books like the Bible and others were distorted to establish the philosophy of racism and to connect it to religion as has been the case in India for about three thousand years.

Yet, racism was not invented in Europe or by the type of Europeans we know today. The earliest forms of racism came from two sources. One is the invaders who entered Black Naga India during the 1700's B.C. and after hundreds of years of fierce warfare, extermination and genocide along with religious trickery (such as entering a Black religions, taking over the books, changing them), racism became tied to religions.

In like manner, the 'Hebrews" who were said to be partially composed of Semites from the wilderness and who were among the invaders of Egypt before the time of Ahmose tried to establish a system of oppression in Egypt but the Egyptian High Priests, who were the real power behind the thrones of Egypt at one time, rejected the foreign influence and religious ideas. Later on, Ahmose was able to defeat and drive out the Hyksos and Egypt did not fall into the same conditions that India fell into when the Black originators of the Indus Valley culture were driven to untouchability and the invaders established their rule, religion and culture.

FALSE SCIENCE AND FALSE BELIEFS USED TO JUSTIFY RACISM SINCE 3000 B.C.

According to M. Gopinath of Dalit Sahitya Sangathane, (see the book, ref. "A History of Racism and Terrorism, Rebellion and Overcoming," pub. by Xlibris, www.xlibris.com ), in ancient times, a race of people related to Africans who were Blacks and called Naga, were spread from South Asia (also found from the South Pacific, through Indo China to South India all the way west to Cape Verde in Africa) all the way to West Africa. The Naga were a branch of this ancient Black race who were the first people to establish civilization and culture around the world.

The Naga were the people we call today Negro/ Negroid, African/ Africoid or loosely, The Black Race.

According to Gopinath, the Blacks of India were invaded and their culture destroyed. Nomads from Eurasia spend hundreds of years working to distroy what was a magnificent Black civilization that was spread from Eastern India all the way to Afghanistan and who were related to Blacks in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia and the region thereof.

Although the Blacks were not militarily conquered, they were psycholigically and religiously conquered when their religious beliefs, writings and traditions were distorted by the invaders who established a system of "varna" or color caste gading to maintain an apartheid-like system. This system continues today in India and although people of jet black skins can be found in the highest levels of the caste system and people of fair skin can be found in the lowest levels, it is the very fair skinned, high caste people who dominate South Asian aristocracy, while the Black/darkskinned majority are at the middle to bottom.

The invaded civilization of the Indus Valley, which was a Black civilization related to the Black Elamites and Black Cushites of Mesopotamia and East Africa was destroyed and entire Black tribes and peoples wiped out from Afghanistan, northern India and parts of India. Those who refused to be part of the caste system were labeled "Untouchables," and these were the remnabts of those who fought the white nomads from northern Eurasia who infiltrated India (see more from the text, "Susu Economics: The History of Pan-African Trade, Commerce, Money and Wealth," pub. by 1stBooks Library, 2595 Vernal Pike, Bloomington, Indiana 47404 U.S.A. ) www.1stbooks.com 1(800) 839-8640 Also read, "The Black Untouchables of India," by V.T. Rajshekar, Y.N. Kly, Runoko Rashidi, pub. by www.claritypress.com )

Yet, despite the degradation of the Blacks of Cushite India and Cushite Sudan (Nubia-Cush) who were masters of science, technology and art (read Drusilla Dungee Houston's "Wonderful Ethiopians of the Mighty Cushite Empire," pub. by Black Classics Press, Baltimore, MD ), those who were able to rebuild their ancient civilizations continued to make and create magnificent works and contribute to world development. In fact, as Houston points out, much of what is called "Arabian" civilization is actually Black Sabean and Black Cushite civilization later adopted by the nomadic Semites.

Ironically, the Black Cushites were the first people to be vilified and defamed by racist Semitic religiouis writings such as the lie called "The Curse of Ham," which has been used to perpetuate racism, slavery and oppression of Blacks to this day.

BUDDHA'S CONTRIBUTION TO IMPROVING THE LIVES OF BLACK NAGAS IN INDIA

One of the most important people in world history, Buddha contributes to the uplifting of the Black Cushtes of India after they were downpressed for many years by the nomads who took control of India. According to Indian historians of the Dalit group, India's flowering and the upliftment of the Naga and the Black Untouchable population of India occurred a few centuries before the Birth of Christ due to the works of Buddha and that Buddhism was a rejection of the previous religion that was extremely oppressive to the indigenous Black Indian/Native population of India.

THE LESSER IMPORTANCE OF RACISM AGAINST BLACKS/ETHIOPIANS DURING ROMAN AND GREEK PERIOD

Racism was not a strong factor against Blacks during the Greek and Roman period of civilization in Europe (800 B.C. to 400 A.D.). In fact, by 800 B.C., when the Greeks were beginning to make their mark in Europe, they were overshadowned by powerful Black civilizatons in the Mediterranean. There were the Black Maurites/Canaanites of Spain, the Western Mediterranean, the Egyptians in the Eastern Mediterannean, the Nubians, Black Sabeans/Ethiopians of the Red Sea and Indian Ocean and the Colchians of the Black Sea Region/Armenia. These Black nations dominated parts of the Mediterannean and one finds them mentioned in the Greek Epics such as the Illyad and Homer's works.

In fact, the founders of early Greek or "Negreecian" civilizations were the Egyptians themselves, and it was Egyptian priests to reminded Herodotus that the Egyptians had been in the "Peleponeses" thousands of years before the Greeks arrived. Factually, the Dorian Greeks who were the first "white" Greeks arrived from Central Asia along with a number of other Caucasoid peoples who also entered into Northern Italy, France, Spain,

Germany and parts of Western Europe. In fact, today's Afghans, Pashtoons and other Central Europeans and Altaic Russians are directly related to the various Western European nations of today.

As far as the Romans, Greeks and early Jews (Isrealites) were concerned, Blacks/Cushites/Ethiopians/Egyptians were a great people and as far as the Romans and Greeks were concerned (see Herodotus, "The Histories," ) the Ethiopians or Africans were the inventors of "pomp and ceremony, laws," and other aspects of civilization. On the other hand, the Romans and Greeks looked at other Europeans, particularly the Celtics as barbarians and it is also the Greeks who are credited for popularizing blonde-haired jokes, because they considered the blonde and red-haired Celtics and other Europeans to be "stupid" and inferior. Still, Roman and Greek contempt for the Celtics and Northern/Central Europeans was based on cultural chauvanism on the parts of the Romans and Greeks.

They could not develop the same type of feelings for Blacks they encountered because at that period, Blacks in Nubia, Egypt, South Arabia, Sabean Ethiopia, Colchis (Black Sea Area, Russia), India, North-West Africa, Iberia, were highly advanced and although the Greeks and Romans ment Black nomads, they did not base Black developent primarily on the nomadic people they met (as many racists have done for centuries to point to Black "backwardness.")

After the corrupting of the Bible and the use of the Bible to justify slavery during the 1600's (see the players and writers involved, 'A History of Racism and Terrorism, Rebellion and Overcoming," pub. by www.xlibris.com ), as well as the pervasive pushing of the slave trade by the Europeans in the West and the Semites in the East, theories on race and racism itself developed and was used as an excuse to justify slavery. Both the Europeans and Semites used similar excuses such as that lie called "the curse of Ham," which was actually a "curse" on Canaan. Canaan, Ham's Black son is said to have been the creator of civilization in Fhenkhu (Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Isreal, the Levant), and a master seafarer and trader. Cush built great civilizations from India to the Mende Sahara, while Punt developed Somalia the Black lands East of India and Mizraim developed Egypt. This is the story as the Bible gives it, althoug many Africans don't believe the flood affected the entire world and that Black civilization in places like the Sahara and Central Africa existed tens of thousands of years ago, even when parts of Congo did not have thick forestation and half of the Sahara was covered by an inland sea with the other half a place of great civilizations including the mother and father civilizations that gave birth to Egypt and others.

AN INFERIOR COMPLEX AMONG PEOPLE WHO FEEL INFERIOR WILL ALWAYS TOLERATE A RACIST SOCIETY

Racism will never disappear as long as those who are the victims of racism continue to accept their lot, remain dependant on the racist element and their system, or continue to live among the racists and their system. It is a fact that the serf class and servant class of 17th to 19th century England and Europe who were tired of that system separated themselves from the British/Europeans. Many of the English and Irish racists who oppressed Blacks in the Americas were themselves treated worse than slaves when they were in Europe/England, yet, a system of oppressing Blacks based on race and color and that holds "pink" or pale complexion and European features to a high standard in America treated formerly white surfs as kings and queens, opening to them a large land where they could simply take the property of the Black Aboriginals and Mongoloid "Indians" who were here before them.

MOST BLACKS BELIEVE THAT THE SOLUTION TO CONTINUED OPPRESSION OF BLACKS IS BLACK NATIONHOOD AND INDEPENDANCE

Today, there seems to be a fuss about white students attending an all-white prom in the Southern U.S. (forgot the state), while Blacks who also have their all-Black proms seem not to care one bit. Yet, what many of us who find this resegregation don't know is that Blacks in the Southern U.S. from Florida to Texas have long rediscovered that much of the Southern States, where the most horrible attrocities and most rabid racists existed and may still exist is land that was illegally taken from the Black African-American nations like the Jamassee and Gwale of the area from North Carolina to Florida, or the Jamassee of Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama and the Washitaw of the Mississippi/Louisiana region whose one million square miles were illegally sold by France for three cents an acre.

Blacks in the South and other parts of the U.S. are very well aware of this history, that is why unlike the day of old before Blacks knew their history and considered "integration" to be the salvation, it is the return of Black lands in the South and the rebuilding of Black nationhood and independance that is of most importance to most Blacks. Attending a prom with white students is not going to improve the lot of Blacks in the South who have seen how the rest of the Black world and the world in general works.

Many Blacks continue to ask, "Where are the white students and the call for whites to sit next to Japanese students in Japan so that the Japanese students can be "equal?" The Japanese are equal no matter what others say because they are human beings first and foremost and accomplishment, advancement and progress of peoples, races and cultures depend on exposure to resources, good trade and the lack of obstacles to stop advancement.

Many Nigerians in England are exposed to the very same conditions that make Japan an the Japanese people an accomplished people. Hence, Nigerians in England where the environment is primarily white (50 million whites, 6 million Blacks including Blacks from India, where the term "Black" is used by the British to describe darkskinned people from India, Africans, Afro-West Indians from the Caribbean, Afro-Brisith and other Black/Negroid peoples). It is also in England that the Nigerians are the most upwardly mobile group, while certain sectors of the white Catholic Irish and working class British populations are the losest levels.

So, we should not be astonished that Blacks in the South could care less whether whites go to an all white prom and don't invite Blacks. Of course, it does not look good for the nation as a whole, when unity against others and coheisiveness is what is needed especially now, but at the same time, when whites decide to return to segregation, they are contributing to their own self-destruction and are simply pushing Blacks who have sat on the fence and not joined in the movement for Black independance and nationhood a reason to do so. No people in their right mind will ever accept Jim Crow and slavery conditions, even if some Southern states have initiated the new "fifty-cent" form of high tech slavery, contine to disenfranchise Blacks and continue to maaintain a system of near surfdom in the South. Sooner of later, Blacks in the South will realize that rebuilding and returning the old Black nations of the South is the key to Black survival.

In retrospect, scientists, pseudo-scientists and others can say all they want about the conditions of Blacks and whether it is due to racism or not, that will not stop Blacks from seeing that only pulling up self by the bootstraps through independant economies, independant lands and creating a strong and separate culture from an oppressive class is the way that improvements will be made in the conditions of all Blacks rather than a tiny few. The sad reality about racism is that after Blacks are severely oppressed, even their music, jazz, culture and anything they produce is stolen. It reminds one of the old racist European scheme of raiding the ancient

treasures of Benin, the Ashanti and the Nubians of Sudan (sounds familiar??), carrying off statues and artworks in gold, bronze, ivory, iron and other metals, carrying off scrolls, tablets, parchment books and other artefacts, taking stone and terracotta carvings, finding statues and statuettes and breaking off the noses and faces (as some is being accused of doing in Sudan today, and as the one group was accused of doing to the Buddha statue in Afghanistan), after the ravaging of Black culture is completed, then saying Blacks have no hhistory, civilization and culture.

According to "A History of Racism and Terrorism, Rebellion and Overcoming," pub. by Xlibris, www.xlibris.com ) During the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries, a number of Europeans who were coming out of the early and mid Middle Ages period as the most backward people on planet earth began to explore, exploit and ravage the lands of people around the world. From the time of Shakespeare's "Othello" when Black Moors and "Saraceans" (Arabs) were the most accomplished people in Europe to the late 1800's, Europeans went around the world studying and copying the cultures, religions and habits of others. Many theorists and inventors of racism journied to places like India, where they were exposed to much of the racism and casteism that existed there and began creating theories about races, racial differences, false sciences dealing with why some races are better off than others.

THE ANSWER AND FACTS ON THE RACE ISSUE;
This book examines race, racism and Black revolution and retaliation against oppression in a manner never before tackled.

"A History of Racism and Terrorism, Rebellion and Overcoming," pub. by Xlibris, 436 Walnut Street 11th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA www.xlibris.com 1(215) 923-4686 1(888) 795-4274 After reading this great work, the PBS series will seem a mere tease.

Read more about this work:
http://community.webtv.net/paulnubiaempire

Revalation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews{i.e,Judahites, thus Israelites and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan

Revelation 3:9 "behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."

Also, how many Christians have been told that there are actually a people who admit to being these impostors masquerading as Jews? For example, The 1980 Jewish Almanac's first chapter entitled �Identity Crisis� begins with the following admission: �Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew.'� This fact is confirmed by several other Jewish sources and individual Jews. For example: The Jewish Encyclopedia (1905); The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (1966); Nathan M. Pollock, Professor of Medieval Jewish History of Tel Aviv, Bernard Lazare; Robert Quillan; Dr. Benjamin Freedman; James Yaffe; Paul Meyer and many more. Dr. Oscar Levy went so far as to declare: �And are not they [today's Jews] the inventors of the Chosen People myth?� The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler, presents countless historical and scientific facts, which exposes this fraud. Why hasn't Christendom and the nations of the world been told that the people of European origin known as �Jews� are not descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob?

History reveals that the modern so-called Jews are actually descendants of the fierce Turkish, Khazar tribes which roamed the steppes of southern Russia and who adopted the religion of Judaism between the 7th and 9th Centuries. Today, the Khazars are known as �Ashkenazi Jews� and �Israelis� not because of race or genealogy, but because of religious conversion. As stated, the Bible declares that there would be Israelite impostors; these impostors have inadvertently or deliberately identified themselves by their own writings. Therefore, if �they� are not true Israel , someone else must be! According to all historical, scientific and biblical facts, after loosing their land in the wars with the Babylonians 2,700 years ago, ten of the twelve tribes of Israel began migrating to Asia , the Pacific Islands , North, South and Central America , leaving behind only three tribes i