A Life of Struggle
Farewell to Hermann Gorter*
Anton Pannekoek
(1927)
In the person of Hermann Gorter,
the revolutionary proletariat has just lost one of its most faithful friends
and one of its most notable comrades in arms. He figured among the greatest
experts in Marxist theory and was one of the very few who,
through conflicts and splits, remained invariably devoted to revolutionary
communism.
Gorter was born on November 26, 1864, the son
of a well-known writer; upon completing his studies in the humanities, he was
appointed institute professor of secondary education. While still young he
composed Mei (“May”), a work of
poetry which had an explosive impact on the world of letters in Holland and was
immediately considered a masterpiece. The decade of the 1880s was a veritable
literary golden age; a whole constellation of writers and poets arose during
that period. Rebelling against the formal tradition which had
been erected into a canon of beauty, truth and the expression of feeling, this
school made the earth shake beneath the feet of Dutch language and letters.
In the 1890s, however, the well progressively ran dry: everyone went their own
ways. Gorter, too, had to watch in amazement as the movement of the “eighties”
was struck down by sterility. He immersed himself in the great works of
literature: the Greeks of antiquity, the Italians of the Middle
Ages, the English of the early modern era, in an effort to discover the source
of their power. He applied himself to philosophy, he translated Spinoza, he
studied Kant, but this did not give him any answers or new impulses. He then
turned to the writings of Marx, and found what he was looking for: a clear
understanding of social development as the basis for men’s spiritual
production. Whenever a new class has erupted in history, whenever its efforts
have borne fruit, one witnesses a new energy, a new feeling of power, and a new
enthusiasm lead to a flowering in letters; and this was certainly the case with
the movement of which Gorter himself was part; an intellectual buoyancy
accompanied the take-off of capitalist development in Holland. But Marx also
showed him the limitations of the bourgeois development which had taken place,
he taught him to understand the class struggle. And from that point on Gorter dedicated
himself body and soul to the cause of the fighting proletariat. In a series of
articles entitled Critique of the
Literary Movement of the 1880s in Holland (1899-1900) he drew up a balance
sheet of his past in order to set forth the self-understanding which he had
acquired during that period. Towards the end of his life he turned once again
to these questions, examining the masterpieces of world literature in the light
of social evolution, but was unfortunately unable to bring his labors to a
conclusion.
Gorter joined the social
democratic workers party of Holland
during the late 1890s. The clear simplicity with which he expounded its
principles soon made him one of the most popular orators of this rapidly
growing movement. He also published some excellent propaganda pamphlets. Later,
however, he entered into open conflict with the party leaders who, with the
growth of the movement, had increasingly gravitated towards reformism. Together
with Van der Goes and Henriette Roland-Holst, he founded the journal De Nieuwe Tijd (“The New Era”), an organ
of Marxist theory and principled critique. In regard to every one of the
crucial questions which were the most important issues of the day—the agrarian
question, education, the rail workers strike, elections—he was in the front
ranks of those combating opportunism. He was nonetheless a member of the
party’s leadership for a while, but finally his entire group was reduced to a
minority faction by the reformist politicians and was denounced as a threat to
the party (1906). These confrontations (similar to those that were coming to a
head in every country) led him to focus his attention on forging close contacts
with German social democracy. Although he only rarely contributed articles to Neue Zeit (“New Era”), the theoretical
organ of German social democracy, Gorter established friendly relations with
Kautsky, relations which later cooled when the two men went their separate ways
but were never completely quenched. Nor was this the only time that, as a
result of their open minds and broad outlooks, as well as because of the
rigorous objectivity of their militant activities, friends gained in the common
struggle remained friends later, although the course of the workers movement
had turned them into political adversaries.
The conflict within the party
reached a point of no return during the following year when some younger
militants, Wijnkoop and Van Ravensteyn, launched their own attack on the
parliamentary practice of the party leaders and began publishing an opposition
weekly, De Tribune. After an extended
period of further debate, they were expelled in 1909 and founded a new party,
the Social Democratic Party, which later became the Communist Party. Gorter
joined them and became the party’s most outstanding leader, although he was
constrained to leave to others the job of determining practical policy. He was
also physically in a quite weakened state. Gifted with an iron constitution, he
was capable of considerable efforts and, at the same time that he was teaching
several different classes, he indefatigably dedicated himself to political
activity. But when strife broke out in the ranks of the new party, he burned
the candle at both ends, sometimes working twenty-four hours a day; as a result
he suffered from exhaustion, which served to remind him of the limits of human
powers.
Gorter was a poet at heart, that
is, a being who perceives directly and with clarity what there is of immensity,
of the truly universal in the world, and knows how to express this in a
language of total beauty or, to put it another way, in a language of total
truth. These years of tireless activity and theoretical studies had the effect
of leading him to increasingly transcribe the new socialist concept of the
world in terms of immediate feelings. First, he brought out Ein klein
heldendicht (“A Little Epic Poem”), which describes the awakening of class
consciousness in two workers, a man and a woman; it was the epic poem of the
proletariat, but in a more restricted framework and in a more peaceful
environment. Later, in 1912, Pan
appeared in its first version (it was to be significantly expanded later),
which describes in a symbolic form the emancipation of the human species
through the class struggle. Compared to Mei,
which is a limpid, luminous vision of the world which emerged from the
illusions characteristic of carefree youth, Pan
appears as the epic poem, rich in content, with powerfully contrasted nuances,
of the finally mature Weltanschaung
(World Concept) of conscious man.
Then, after 1914, the black
period of his life began; the decline of the revolutionary workers movement
affected his profoundly sensitive spirit. Not allowing himself
to become dejected, Gorter carried on the fight. He was undoubtedly aware of
the fact that the situation could not be otherwise but, like so many of us, he
was nonetheless consumed by sadness. When the war broke out, bringing in its
wake the collapse of social democracy, he published Der Imperialismus, der Weltkrieg und die Sozialdemokratie
(“Imperialism, the World War and Social Democracy”) where he proved that this
collapse had its origin in the reformism of the working class itself. The text
was printed in German in Amsterdam; the state of
emergency, however, almost totally prevented its circulation in Germany.
But even during these moments of maximally accentuated regression he did not
lose his faith in the proletariat and its capacity for engendering a new
revolutionary movement. And when the Russian Revolution broke out and, one year
later, a revolutionary wave swept over Europe,
he devoted himself wholeheartedly to the movement. In Switzerland, where he was living
for reasons of health, he was in permanent contact with the Russian embassy; it
was there that he wrote his work Die
Weltrevolution (“The World Revolution”) in 1918. When the staff of the
Russian embassy was expelled from Switzerland
in November 1918, he left with them for Berlin,
where he made contact with the emerging revolutionary movement. From then on he
never ceased to cooperate with the German communist movement; on repeated
occasions he clandestinely crossed the border to go to Berlin to participate in conferences and
debates.
His presence in Germany was
rendered all the more necessary by the fact that the German communist movement,
which he supported with heart and soul, was the origin of yet another
disappointment even more serious than the one he suffered in the Dutch party,
because it was not expected this time, and also because of the fact that the
revolution which had begun was destroyed not so much by the blows of an
external power as by an internal weakness, a deviation from its own principles.
Gorter was one of the first people to discern the danger of opportunism
inherent in the Bolsheviks’ tactics for western
Europe, whose erroneous nature he proved in an Open Letter to Comrade Lenin. After a hazardous journey made all
the more risky due to his poor health, he arrived in Russia where, during the course of
personal interviews with Lenin and meetings with the Executive Committee of the
Third International, he tried to convince them of the errors of their ways. But
it did not take long for him to see and to understand why his efforts were in
vain: Russia
could not become anything but a bourgeois State. From that moment, Gorter
offered his services to the KAP. On the occasion of the internal conflicts that
tore the KAP apart, he opted for the Essen
tendency, to which he contributed a great deal as its spokesman; however, he
often had to admit that the Berlin
tendency acted in an almost exemplary way in practice and he assisted both
fractions. Considering their differences as of secondary importance and their
quarrels as obsolete, he made active contributions to efforts to achieve their
reunification.
His health seriously deteriorated
during these later years. As a consequence of repeated ordeals of overexertion,
to which was added the terrible blow of his wife’s death in 1916, and due also
to the depression he suffered as a result of the disappointing evolution of the
workers movement, he was afflicted with chronic bronchial asthma, of a nervous
origin, which physically exhausted him. But the power of his spirit raised him
to an ever higher state of lucidity and an increasingly broad and penetrating
vision of the world. Gorter worked tirelessly to give expression to the new
beauty which he felt; he plunged into an in-depth study of Marxism, the great
poets of the past, communism and, in his final days, he said that he felt
capable of creating an even more perfect work than anything he had written
before. But his illness suddenly took a turn for the worse during a visit to Switzerland, and he died during his return to Brussels on September 15, 1927.
Gorter was a force of nature,
full of youthful freshness, a being in total harmony both physically as well as
morally. During his youth he ardently participated in almost every sport;
cricket, tennis and sailing held no secrets from him and, even during his last
years, he proved to be an indefatigable walker. Every page of his poetic work
is testimony to the depth of his love for Nature. He could plod for hours, in
fall and winter, across deserted beaches, absorbed in the infinite beauty of
the waves and the strand; in Switzerland
he spent entire days exploring mountains, eager for the solitude of
snow-covered summits. A classicist and man of letters by his natural gifts, a
notable expert in philosophical matters, he was later capable of keeping abreast
of the difficult questions of the natural sciences in order to develop his
concept of the world from every angle. Such a man necessarily was compelled to
subscribe to socialism in order to be in perfect harmony with the world.
Henceforth he devoted himself to the working class and to communism. His poetic
work, the most complete expression of his being, unfortunately can only be read
by workers who understand Dutch. But among the Dutch workers, there are many
who profess a fervent admiration for Gorter’s poetry. In this recent period of
the workers movement, Gorter stands out as a luminous figure, an example of the
new humanity in the course of its transformation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* A. Pannekoek: “Ein Kämpferleben. Abschied
von Hermann Gorter,” Kommunistische
Arbeiter Zeitung (Berlin), VIII, September 1927, No. 74 and Kommunistische Arbeiter Zeitung (Essen),
VI, 1927, No. 9.