Fabrics
The
selection of fabrics suggested for this gown doesn't offer a very wide
choice and many of the fabrics suggested are not accurate.
Technically
silk, linen, linen/cotton blend (called fustian) and wool were the
fabrics available to an average Elizabethan woman. Silk imported to
England would not have had lumps in it like modern Shantung or Dupioni,
Elizabethan people valued the skill it takes to create a smooth cloth
and saw slubs in a piece of silk as a flaw not an interesting feature.
Fine lightweight cotton was available in 16thcentury
England but it was hideously expensive. Cotton was so expensive
that Queen Elizabeth I is only recorded as having one cotton garment (a
smock that was a given to her by the King of Spain) and it is said
it was so precious she never wore it (though an alternative explanation
is that she didn't want to wear it because it was from the King of
Spain).
For
winter wear use wool, silk or cotton velvet/een.While silk velvet would
have been the fabric available in the 16th
century pure silk velvet is out of the price range of most people and
cotton velvet is probably the best substitute available and cotton
velveteen comes a close second.
In Summer I would suggest linen, silk or tropical weight wool if you
can find it, blends of those fabrics are also a good choice. It's
especially important to avoid plastic type synthetics in summer as you
really will overheat. But you need to think about your own climate and
how well you cope with hot or cold weather when you decide what fabrics
you will use.
If
you can't afford to make two different outfits for different seasons,
you can make a summer weight gown warm enough for winter by adding
extra layers underneath, such as petticoats or a complete under-gown
which can then be worn on its own in less formal situations.
Brocades
can be used for the gown but be wary of using brocade for both the
forepart and the gown as different brocade patterns will often clash.
If you do want to use brocades for both make sure you see the two
patterns side by side before you buy. If you aren't sure what patterns
you are looking for in a brocade look at Anabella Wake's article on the motifs
found in renaissance
textiles.
If you opt for wool or linen select it carefully as you need something
that is stiff enough to make the cartridge pleats stand out, I aim for
something of roughly the same weight as a lightweight canvas or denim.
There is an article on Drea Aleed’s site about the fabrics appropriate for
Elizabethan costume.
You
can substitute synthetics or cotton for the period fabrics if you
don’t mind being inaccurate, how far you
go in your substitutions is up to you. However, it is important to
remember that plastic type synthetics (polyester, nylon etc.)
don’t breathe at all and are a fire hazard. Plant based
synthetics (rayon, viscose, tencel etc.) are somewhat better in that
they do breathe almost as well as cotton and don’t melt, but
they are much more fragile than natural fibres, especially the silk
they try to imitate.
Before
you start this dress it's a good idea to spend some time looking at
Elizabethan portraits to get an idea of what look you are aiming for
Your garments, from the skin out...
- A smock, calf to ankle length,
which is not included in the pattern. Smocks work to protect your
clothes from you, by absorbing your sweat and body oils they keep your
outer garments relatively clean meaning your hard to wash velvet ,wool
or brocade should only need to be washed if you spill something on it
or it falls in the dirt. Having a couple of smocks is usually a good
idea. Two smocks means you can wear the same outfit for a whole weekend
without having to put yesterday’s sweaty smock back on
(altogether now, eeeww). If you’re going to be wearing garb
for more than one day in a row two is the absolute minimum number of
smocks you’ll need, having two smocks means you can wear one
while you wash the other. If you want to avoid laundry while
you’re at an event you need to pack at least one smock per
day, or at least give them several days to air out.
- The partlet should be made of a
similar weight fabric as (or could possibly even be a part of) your
smock. If you don’t want it to be plain embroidered organza
can be a good option though it is more expensive than plain fabrics. If
you are on a budget, smaller items like partlets, foreparts or sleeves
are are probably the best place to splurge on really nice fabrics as
they can make a plain outfit look more special with relatively little
fabric. Several portraits show partlets which appear to be embroidered
and often match the sleeves (Such as Queen Elizabeth's Pelican
portrait, below) Some costumers theorize that these two elements may
actually be a single shirt rather than separate sleeves and a partlet,
so far I have not seen any firm evidence one way or the other but a
separate partlet can be used with different sleeves but an embroidered
sleeve could be damaged if you put another, tighter, sleeve over the
top. Partlets can be constructed as simply as a rectangle of fabric
with ties at the bottom corners to tie underneath your arms. It should
not snap into the neckline of your gown as the pattern indicates. (The
partlet may go either under or over the corset but this style of
lightweight partlet always goes under the gown) Tammie Dupuis has a 'demo' on how to
make a partlet, if you want the
gathered look as shown in the pattern it's a simple process to make the
pattern bigger, cut out an extra large neck hole and gather the
neckline in.
- A Corset, In this pattern the
bodice acts as a corset, there's some evidence that earlier garments
may have used stiff fabrics like buckram to create the desired shape in
their bodices. By the 1570s, however, there's definite evidence for a
separate 'pair of bodies' with bones and a wooden busk, which we would
call a corset. For a corset pattern both Drea Aleed and Tammie Dupuis have instructions for
drafting your own. If that sounds too daunting Butterick
has a pattern for an
18th century corset (4254) that will give you a similar shape to that
achieved with a 16th century corset, it will look more 16th century and
less 18th century if all the boning is vertical, parallel to the centre
front line.
The best option would be to make a completely separate corset but if
you really don’t want a separate corset you could bone the
bodice as the pattern instructions indicate (though I don’t
recommend it). With a corset you can make the bodice in pretty fabric
without worrying about bones working their way through (my first
corset was essentially destroyed when the bones worked holes through
the fabric). It's also much easier to cover up the ridges created by
boning in a corset than if the boning is in the bodice. This is
especially important if you use cable ties (see the link below), as
they are thicker than the more traditional boning materials like
spring-steel so they stand out more, ridges of obvious boning showing
through your bodice does not look good. The other reason to create a
separate corset is the cost of the boning, boning each one of your
bodices can get expensive fast, it is much cheaper to buy enough bones
for one corset that gives you the right shape under all of your outfits
than enough bones for each bodice you make.
To achieve the period cone shaped silhouette you will need something
stronger than rigilene unless you are entirely devoid of curves. If you
are on a budget and can't afford steel boning I've heard good things
about the cable ties you can get from hardware stores, they are not
only stronger than rigilene they're also cheaper. Look at Sarah Goodman's article for more ideas
on what you can use for boning.
- The Farthingale and
Bum-roll, The Farthingale is not a period pattern, but
it gives the right silhouette under your gown and anybody in a
situation to see you in your underwear is not likely to be interested
in critiquing your historical accuracy. The only modifications I would
make to this pattern would be, to adjust for the back length to make up
for not having the bum-roll underneath and make a proper waistband about
one or two inches wide. A waistband is important as with the weight of
the hoops plus the fabric of the other skirts on top using ribbon for a
waistband may dig in and be uncomfortable. Synthetic ribbon is also
slippery to sew and will melt if you accidentally set your iron
temperature too high. If you want a period farthingale pattern both of
the above sites have articles on Juan de Alcega's farthingale pattern.
There is some debate over the existence in period of bumrolls, Sarah Goodman has a good summary of
the case against
bumrolls. In my opinion bumrolls are essentially a
costumers cheat to get the look of a couple of cartridge pleated
petticoats while only wearing one layer of fabric.
- The forepart and
Petticoats.
To point out the obvious, metallic pen and gluing on fake pearls is not
period and will make it virtually impossible to wash (washing may
destroy the glue and dry-cleaning may destroy the pearls, depending on
what chemicals are used). If you want to decorate the forepart sewing
on beads, jewels or embroidery are more durable and more period. An
undecorated forepart is also perfectly period and more common in
portraits. Alternatively you could omit the forepart entirely and sew
the over-skirt closed in front. It's generally a good idea to wear two
or more petticoats (i.e. under skirts), preferably cartridge pleated,
in order to give you that 'bum-roll effect' and to prevent the lines of
the farthingale from showing on the outside. If you are wearing a
forepart that counts as one petticoat.
- A gown (one garment with the
bodice and skirt sewn together) is easier to manage than a separate
bodice and skirt, Melissa Heischelberg has an article on her
site explaining the evidence for why I don't believe in waistbands for Elizabethan
costuming. Even ignoring the accuracy or inaccuracy of waistbands I
advise against a waistband on the outer skirt for practical reasons.
Stacking three waistbands (farthingale, forepart and over-skirt) on top
of each other will be uncomfortable.
If you use a corset the bodice should not necessarily require any
boning, most of the surviving garments from the 16th
century have no boning whatsoever, but an interlining of canvas helps
create smooth lines. A lot of people advocate lightly boning your
bodice as well as wearing it over a corset. It does help ensure the
bodice remains smooth, but because the surviving gowns in Patterns of Fashion generally do not have
this boning I choose not to bone my outer garments.
The bodice should be made from the same fabric as the over-skirt. This
inaccuracy in the pattern is because it’s a copy of the dress
worn by Gwyneth Paltrow in Shakespeare in Love.
For some reason the movie's costumer chose to make many of the bodices
match the underskirts, despite the fact that this was incredibly rare
in period. In total I've found two sixteenth century examples of the
bodice not matching the skirt, both of these were Italian.
|
- The sleeves could match the partlet,
the gown or the forepart, all three options appear in various
portraits. The sleeves would most likely have been laced on (so you can
swap them around to change the look of the dress or remove them when it
gets too hot) and the shoulder roll, or other shoulder treatment, hid
the lacing.
I believe the pattern's designer was attempting to reconstruct the look
of a shoulder roll similar to the one shown in Queen Elizabeth's
Pelican Portrait (right) but used modern techniques and created a
puffed sleeve. In reality the shoulder rolls were probably a fabric
tube which is curved to the shape of your shoulder (using lots of
little darts on the underside) and then covered with the decorative
fabric.
Though you can see this sort of puffed sleeve on loose gowns such as
the portrait of an unknown lady (right) but in these cases they match
the gown. I have not yet seen a puffed sleeve on this style of 'low
bodied' gown (i.e. a gown with an open neckline). If you don't like the
look of a shoulder roll there are several alternative ways of covering
the shoulder join, just have a look at some portraits for inspiration.
|
Unknown
Artist, 1575, Queen Elizabeth's 'Pelican' Portrait (sleeves match the
partlet)
Unknown
artist, 1557, Portrait of an unknown lady (puffed sleeves)
|
George
Gower, 1585, Portrait of Lettyce Knollys (sleeves match the forepart)
Unknown
Artist, 1575, Queen Elizabeth's 'Phoenix' Portrait, (sleeves match the
gown)
|