|
Superior Performance Indicator |
Sufficient Performance Indicator |
Limited Performance Indicator |
Minimum Performance Indicator |
| Research of Biographical Information |
Collected all information needed to apply biographical data to the reading selection plus accurately and clearly to the timeline. |
Collected most of information needed and information meets most but not all needs in application to the reading selection or for creation of timeline. |
Collected some information but information is unclear in application to the reading selection or for creation of timeline. |
Did not collect information needed for apply biography to reading selection or for creation of timeline. |
| Creation of program/ playbill including biography, acts/scenes/timeline, cast, cover with illustration. |
Product reflects collection of all data needed and is well organized both in information and graphic appeal. |
Product reflects collection of most data needed and is organized but lacks either clarity or graphic appeal. |
Product reflects collection of most data needed and is organized but lacks clarity and graphic appeal. |
Product does not reflect collection of data needed and is not organized, lacks clarity and graphic appeal. |
| Group presentation convinces the audience to include the selection in the upcoming theatre presentation of Poe. |
Uses original approach effectively and is highly organized. Well rehearsed showing ease in delivery and adequate preparation. |
Uses original approach effectively and is highly organized but shows lack of rehearsal with inadequate delivery and preparation. |
Approach is less than effective and shows little organization. Some evidence of rehearshal but lacks delivery. |
Approach is not effective and shows minimum organization. Little evidence of rehearshal and lacks delivery. |
| Selection of presentation media/mode suited the reading selection and team made good use of the medium/mode of presentation. |
Presentation medium/mode was effective and student use showed expertise. |
Presentation medium/mode was effective and student use showed lack of expertise. |
Presentation medium/mode was not best choice for selection and was not as effective as other mediums. Student use showed lack of expertise. |
Presentation medium/mode was not effective. Student use showed lack of expertise. |
| Individual student worked cooperatively with teammates and participated in elements of the project |
Student worked well with partner and group. Student input was accurate and timely. Student participated in all aspects of the project. |
Student worked well with partner and group. Student input was accurate and timely. Student did not participate in all aspects of the project. |
Student did not work well with partner and/or group. Student input was accurate and timely. Student did not participate in all aspects of the project. |
Student did not work well with partner and/or group. Student input was not always accurate and/or timely. Student did not participate in all aspects of the project. |
| Project overall was professional in both print and nonprint components. |
Project included all components and was presented to the class in a timely professional manner. |
Project included all components and was presented to the class but lacked professional qualities needed to be considered superior. |
Project included most all components and was presented to the class but lacked professional qualities needed to be considered sufficient. |
Project did not include most all components and was presented to the class but lacked professional qualities needed to be considered sufficient or limited. |
