Here is an interesting study on handcuffs produced by the Federal Government.
Its all in the public domain so no need for copyrights or anything like that.
I got it at the University of Arizona main library in Tucson Arizona in the microfiche section.
source c1
Its call number in the library is C 13.58:80-1989
Its fairly easy to read even if it was written by government buerocrats.
NBSIR 80-1989
James E. Harris
Product Performance Engineering Division
Center for Consumer Product Technology
National Engineering Laboratory
National Bureau of Standards
Prepared by
Law Enforcement Standards Laboratory
Center for Consumer Product Technology
National Bureau of Standards
Washington, D.C. 20234
March 1980
Issued April 1980
Prepared for
National Institute of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20531
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Philip M. Klutznick, Secretary
Luther H. Hodges. Jr., Deputy Secretary
Jordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Productivity. Technology. and Innovation
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director
Pages 1, 2, and 3 were skipped. they just explain that handcuffs are used to impair peoples ability to use their hands. something any fucking moron knows but is described in detail by these government buerocrats.
source c2
page 3
The operation of an ordinary handcuff can be understood by referring to figure 1 in conjunction with the following description. When open, the ratchet pivotes freely about the ratchet pivot toward the main body of the handcuff until the teeth of the ratchet engage the teeth of the pawl. Further ratchet movement will cause the spring-loaded pawl to cam up away from the ratchet each time the teeth on the ratchet move over the teeth on the pawl. When the ratchet motion stops, the pawl is forced against the ratchet locking the teeth together. This is the primary locking means. The motion of the ratchet may be continued to a desired amount of closure about an object (a wrist). if there is no object present to prevent continued notion, the ratchet motion may be continued until the ratchet completely passes the pawl. The shapes of the ratchet and pawl teeth, when engaged, and the spring action are such that the ratchet notion is possible in one direction only. In order to open the handcuff when the teeth are engaged, the pawl must be disengaged (against the pawl spring force) from the ratchet teeth. That is the function of the key when unlocking the primary lock. Notice that the pawl is able to move against the pawl spring force only when
page 4 (nothing was scanned execpt the titles for the drawing)
Figure 1. Partial cross section of a typical handcuff with the double lock bolt in the inactive position.
source c3
page 5
the double lock bolt is set to the inactive position (fig. I shows the double lock inactive). When the handcuff is closed to the desired position, the rear tip of the key is then inserted into the pusher hole to engage and press upon the pusher, moving the double lock bolt to the active position as shown in figure 2. with the bolt in this position, the pawl is not able to cam sufficiently to enable the ratchet and pawl teeth to disengage because of the interference between the bolt and the pawl Accordingly, the ratchet cannot he closed further, nor can it be opened. The handcuff is then said to be double locked. No method has been discovered to enable a double locked handcuff to be opened without first moving the bolt to the inactive position unless some parts are physically distorted or cut. To open a double locked handcuff, the double lock bolt must be moved away from the pawl as shown in figure 2 (key turns clockwise). Only after this is done can the tang of the key or a picking tool lift the pawl (against the pawl spring force) away from the ratchet (key turns counterclockwise). In this position, the teeth of the pawl and ratchet are no longer engaged and the ratchet is free to swing in either direction. It should be observed that the function of the pawl spring is two-fold: to retain the pawl against the ratchet to effect the primary locking, and to provide a detent that maintains the double lock bolt in either the active or inactive position. In most handcuffs a properly directed sharp impact of the handcuff against a hard
page 6 (nothing was scanned execpt the titles for the drawing)
Figure 2. Partial cross section of a typical handcuff with the double lock bolt in the active position.
source c4
page 7
object can defeat the detent function of the pawl spring and cause the bolt to move. it is also a simple matter for a skilled person to move the double lock bolt to the inactive position with a paper clip or similar implement. If the double lock bolt moves to the inactive position, it is then possible to open the lock with a picking tool such as a bent paper clip wire, or with a thin-shim that may be inserted between the pawl and ratchet to separate the teeth. if the double lock bolt moves to the active position, the handcuff must be "unlocked" prior to its use. In either case, the ability to move the double lock bolt by a means other than the key is undesirable.
The modified (improved lock) handcuffs that were developed during this study operate on the same principle as the standard handcuff with the following additions. The improved handcuff has means to automatically lock the bolt in the active position. Locking of the bolt in the active position is called triple locking. Refer to figure 3 to follow the operation of the triple locking feature. When the double lock bolt is moved fully to the active position, the pawl spring now forces the corner of the bolt against the housing wall, so that movement to the inactive position is prevented by a ledge inside the handcuff housing. Once the double lock bolt is active, it can only be moved to the
source c5
page 8
inactive position by unseating it from the ledge so that the corner of the bolt will clear the corner of the ledge. It can be seen that the bolt must be unseated prior to and during lateral motion when the bolt moves to the inactive position. As before the lateral motion of the bolt is caused by the tang of the key or the picking tool.
Figure 3. Cross section of a modified handcuff with the
double lock bolt active and held in place by a locking ledge.
source c6
page 9
Two methods have been developed to unseat the bolt under normal operation. One method of unseating the bolt is by the use of a second key which is inserted through a new secondary keyhole located on the opposite side of the handcuff from the standard or primary keyhole as shown in figure 4. Rotation of the second key causes the tang to move the bolt downward and away (unseating) from the ledge. The standard or primary key is inserted through its keyhole and this second key is rotated so that the tang of the key moves the bolt to the inactive position. Both keys or two picking tools must be operated simultaneously to unlock the handcuff and since they are from the opposite sides of the ,handcuff the skill required is high. This results in a difficult feat for a handcuffed person to perform, which improves the security features of the lock. A second method of unseating the bolt is to use a hollow swivel with a concentric protruding pin that serves as a push rod when the chain link within the eye of the swivel is grasped and pressed upon the tip of the protruding pin as shown in figure 5. The pin transmits a force that presses the bolt downward and away (unseating) from the ledge. The key must then be inserted and rotated so that the tang of the key moves the double lock bolt to the inactive position. The action of grasping and pressing of the chain link against the pin to unseat the bolt must be done simultaneously with the turning of the key. These operations are difficult to perform by a handcuffed person because they require a high degree of manual dexterity. The security of the handcuff lock is thereby improved.
page 10 (nothing was scanned execpt the titles for the drawing)
Figure 4. Partial cross section of a modified handcuff showing the secondary keyhold for unseating the double lock bolt and the chamfer of the last tooth of rachet
source c7
page 11
Figure S. Alternate method of unseating an active double lock bolt.
An additional improvement for the locking of the handcuff was developed that automatically double locks (and consequently could triple lock) the handcuff when applied about a wrist or other object. Refer to figures 6 and 7. I-Then the handcuff is applied and closed about a wrist, the pressure of the double/triple lock lever against the wrist will cause counterclockwise rotation of the lever. This rotation will move the other end of the lever to the left where it will engage the pusher, which has been lengthened to protrude from the body of the handcuff, and press upon it thereby moving the double lock bolt to the active position. The handcuff will then be multiple locked. This action is automatic when the handcuff is properly applies. By proper
page 12 (nothing was scanned execpt the titles for the drawing)
Figure 6. Partial cross section of improved handcuff with the double lock bolt inactive.
page 13 was not copied. it contains a picture of the new super handcuffs that cant be picked and are probably super expensive but we dont want to show it to some pig so they waste our tax dollars and buy them
source c8
page 14
design of the geometry of the lever and its pivot, it will be impossible to apply excessive squeezing pressure to the wrist because the lever will activate the double lock and prevent further closure of the handcuff. Officers will not need to use the key to activate the double lock, a maneuver that is difficult to do in the dark or with a hostile individual. Also, officers will not forget to activate the double lock since this improvement causes automatic multiple locking. If combined with the previous improvement, triple locking is effected automatically when the double lock is activated.
The improvement of automatically triple locking makes it very unlikely that any directed shock would be able to unseat and unlock the bolt. In order to accomplish this, one shock would he required to unseat the bolt and while the bolt was unseated against the pawl spring force, a second shock at a right angle to the first would be required to move the bolt to the inactive position. it is very unlikely that anyone would be skillful enough to apply such shocks in the proper direction, intensity and sequence even if they knew how these shocks were required. Finally, it is doubtful if a single shock could replace the two right-angled components because of the internal friction of the sliding bolt against the ledge.
source c9
page 15
The improvements cited in this report are generally applicable to other handcuff-like restraints. Some of these restraints are leg irons, belly chains, leg chains, transportation belts, and hobbles. Since there is sufficient variation in the design, each product would require a detailed examination to determine the aptness of any of these changes.
Modified handcuffs were given to various engineers, technicians law enforcement personnel, instructors and administrators with variable knowledge of handcuffs to see if they could open them. They tried with and without the keys. No one was able to open the hollow swivel type in a reasonable time period, even when not applied to a wrist. The double keyhole type was opened by only a few (with some difficulty) as the second keyhole gave a somewhat obvious clue as to its method of operation, whereas, with the hollow swivel, the clue was well hidden. There was a general consensus that either type would be very difficult to pick by a handcuffed subject. A number of those who evaluated the double-key type believed that there would be some objection to the use of two keys to open the handcuffs, although it was admitted there was high security due to the requirement of two keys used simultaneously.
source c10
page 16
During this investigation a number of possible handcuff modifications, other than to the lock, were identified. These modifications eliminate structural weaknesses or simplify operational procedures and are enumerated below:
source non what so ever
page 17 mike fucked up ----- page 17 is missing
source c11
page 18
the double lock. This improvement is automatically incorporated with the proposed automatic double/triple lock feature as that feature requires the use of a longer pusher and the double lock is automatically activated when the handcuffs are properly applied. The longer pusher improvement is listed separately since it may be incorporated independently of the automatic double/triple lock feature. It is important that the length of the pusher be increased only by the minimum amount required, so that the double lock will not inadvertently or maliciously be activated.
source c12
page 19
Modifications and test results have shown that with fairly easily implemented changes it is possible to significantly increase the security of handcuffs.
source c13
final page with info on how to get the report i cut the stuff i though was bullshit
1. PUBLICATION OR REPORT NO. NBBSIR 80-1989
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: A Study of Handcuff Improvements
7. AUTHORS(S) James L. Harris
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
WASHINGTON, DC 20234
12. SPONSORING ORGANIZATION NAME AND COMPLETE ADDRESS
National Institute of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington D.C. 20531
16. ABSTRACT (A 200-word or lose factual summary of most significant information. It document includes a significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here
Designs for improving the security of present day ratchet and pawl metallic handcuffs are presented. Two methods utilizing a new loci,. feature were developed tnat significantly improve the lock. In addition, several other Ljotential handcuff improvements are discussed in this report.
18. AVAILABILITY Unlimited
For Official Distribution.
Order From
Sup. of Doc.
U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, DC
20402
SO Stock No. SN003-003
Order From National Technical Information Service (NITS)
Springfield, VA.
22161
22. Price $9.95