Re-print from The
South Bend Tribune
South Bend, Indiana
June 25, 2002
Ruling could spare 6 on Indiana's death row
Court: Jury must decide capital sentence
By TOM COYNE
A U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday overturning death sentences of dozens of convicted killers could affect six people on death row in Indiana, state Attorney General Steve Carter said.
The attorney general's office was analyzing the decision to determine its impact, Carter said in a statement. Defense attorneys, however, said they believe it could have a far broader impact.
"Arguably, everyone on death row--even in situations where juries recommended death sentences--could be affected," said Paula Sites, a staff lawyer for the Indiana Public Defender Council. "There is a legal argument there that the fact they were told that their decison was just a recommendation and was not binding could have affected the sentences."
A message seeking further comment from the attorney general's office was not returned.
Juries, not judges must make the crucial decisoins that mean a convicted killer lives or dies, the Supreme Court ruled, a finding that could overturn scores of death sentences nationwide.
The ruling capped a court term that death penalty opponents called the most promising in a quarter century.
The high court declared the sentencing laws of five states unconstitutional. The ruling called into question whether 168 death row inmmates in those states will be put to death, and it also could affect some inmates sentenced in four other states, lawyers said.
The 7-2 ruling affects the system in which judges have the final say after a jury convicts someone of murder.
The constitution guarentees a trial by jury, and that right would be "senselessly diminished" if jurors did not also weigh whether a particular killing merits death or life in prison, Justice Ruth Bader Gisburg wrote for an unlikely alliance of conservative and liberal-leaning justices.
The court rejected arguments from Arizona, where Monday's case originated, that judges can be more evenhanded and less emotional than juries.
Indiana now has 34 people under death sentences and the state is challenging decisions to overturn the death penalties of four others who officially remain on death row.
Three of those people were sentenced to death by a judge even though a jury recommended that they not be executed.
"I'm hopeul that it will call into question at least those three men on Indiana's death row whose juries unanimously recommended that they not receive the death penalty," said Steve Schutte, deputy to the public defender of Indiana.
Those three are:
The state is appealing that ruling and a federal appeals court said it was awaiting the Supreme Court decison handed down Monday before considering the appeal.
Three others in Indiana were sentenced to death even though juries could not reach a decision on a jury recommendation. They are:
One of the nine people put to death in Indiana since the Supreme Court restored the death penalty in 1976 had a deadlocked jury on sentencing but a judge sentenced him to death. Gary Burris was executed on Nov. 20, 1997, for the 1980 slaying of an Indianapolis cab driver.