When an accumulation of energy points (or inferior units) takes place, in the resulting material nucleus the two mentioned forces begin to work:
--GRAVITY that attracts, coheres and compresses this mass and
--MAGNETISM that fixes orbital ones and determines the quantity of mass that the nascent system need to contain according to its volume.
When existing two contrary forces, one that regroups masses and another that tries to redistribute them to its natural space, both arrive to an agreement or balance, proceeding to the rotation of the whole system and this way gravity is compensated partly by the centrifugal force of the system masses.
With this rotation, magnetism is able to create orbits in which the orbital ones are placed, getting this way an allotment of masses through the whole volumen occupied by the system.
(Creation of magnetic orbits and gravitational layers are a problem that needs more extensive explanation, which is not possible to make appropiately in a summary. Although you can see a summery and drawing in the page of Atom Structure Drawing)
(For bigger information I remit to my work Structural Cosmology or Ferman's Atom)
Now well, as each orbit is built at certain distance accordin to the mass of the nucleus, energy o mass always lack to the system is completely balanced. (This occur because the mass of the system could be bigger than enough to contain X electron, and at the same time, to be smaller than enough to contain X+1 electron. This case the system take X+1 electron and complete this increase of volume with more matter)
In this case the magnetism of the system will attract other smaller masses to compensate the energy lack in the system.
This is the case that happens in the chemistry reactions when energy is given or admits to balance the changes made in molecules.
It will also happens when astars need more mass for their magnetic compensation. In this case they take meteorites and other masses from space.
As we can see, this cosmic model is against existence of such atomic particles as protons, nuetrons, quaks, etc. and this model considers to atomic nuclei (and all the gravitational systems) as simple matter. Therefore big matter accumlations or nuclei of the systems are those that cause the birth of strong magnetic fields, which build the orbits and the system's structure.
In the same way, traditional theory about atomic constitution with nuclear particles doesn't resist a serious study on it.
For example:
--If in atomic nuclei proton would exist, to be of same sign their electric charges, these particles should repel among them and to be located very near, this repulsion would be enormous, certenly, thousand of times bigger than their attaction on the electrons. For this reason this nucleus would make explosion immetiately.
--If positive charges would exist in proton, them atomic fusion couldn't be produced because these electric charges should impede this union. In this case electrons would be those that were united to protons because they have negative charge.
--If when an electron is attracted toward another atom, this electron always is situated in a defined orbit, it means that orbits attract to electron and nucleus doesn’t. So that, obits are those that have power to catch, maintain and distribute electron and not the atomic nuclei.
--How is possible that electron never reach atomic nuclei if really they are attract for these nuclei? Because proton loaded electrically don’t exist.
--How is possible that electron, supposedly in balanced orbits (attraction-centrifuge force), don’t precipitate on the nuclei when atoms are compressed.
In the same way, it would be possible to make many questions about it and always we’d have the same conclusion: particles loaded electrically in the atomic nuclei don’t exist.
Atomic nuclei are simply matter and they only are cohered for gravity and don't need any other force for it.
Therefore, “Strong force” to my to understand, it is alone a measurement of the gravity made on the same sources of its birth, to know, on nuclear mass. Reason for which seems to be so big.
It is necessary to consider in this case that we cannot measure this gravity with regard to us, but with regard to the mass that produces it, and being in the atomic nuclei distances almost null, the square of this relative distance until our level will be enormous.
This case, being index of relation between system 10^23 then this index would be the distance to consider between any atomic nucleus (where gravity is produced) and our level. Then the square of this distance ( 10^46 ) would be relative to the gravity value on this nucleus.