| Contents1Copyright |
| The Periodic Atomic Mass Progression of Sub Atomic Particles through the Elements |
| Copyright 1993, 1997, 2001 by Gerald E. Mowery No claim made on government information |
| PUBLISHED By RUDOLPH MAURER PUBLISHING 203 South. G. St. # 217 Tacoma, Wa 98405 |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Throughout the world, thousands and thousands of individuals and scientific organizations, are consistently adding to scientific knowledge. So how does one acknowledge the actions of others, who may have influenced one's HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY. IT BECOMES AN ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TASK Listed below are a few of those individuals. It should be noted, however, that hundreds, if not... thousands and thousands of individuals...have added to knowledge, and then had their names forever lost in the CHAOS of a new IDEAS. I dedicate this book to them: Major Source Papers released by THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION and United States Government. No Copyright claim is made on government information Others: Clifford, Boyle, Lavoisier,Courtois, Democritus, Dalton, Rutherford, Chadwick, Golstein, Thompsen, Bohr, Schrodinger, Hein, Lowry, Ramsay, Raleigh, Charles, Davy, Graham, Haber, Hahn, Kurchatev, Newlands, Pauling, Travers, Moissan, Mowery, Bartlett, Dorn, Dobereiner, Lewis, Meyer, Brown, Mendeleev, Mosely, Roentgen, Bacquerel, Curie.Rutherford, Villard, La Chatelier, Lentz, Meisenheimer, Maurer, Avogdro, Cavendish, Celcius, Villard, Wohler, Lawrence, Bronstead, Arhenius, Priestly, Scheele, Phillips, Metcalf and the thousands of others who I have missed. |
 |
| I wonder how many people it takes to construct a concept; |
 |
 |
| SCIENTIFIC FACT: ICE IS COLD |
|
| FAVORITE SEARCH ENGINE |
| "CHAOS OF NEW IDEAS" What the heck does that mean?. |
| THE INFORMATION AND CONCLUSIONS "ON THESE WEB PAGES" ARE THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR AND MAY NOT BE THE ACCEPTED VALUES ASSIGNED BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. |
| OPINION The atomic radii of an element has but one size with paired isotope configurations confined within this one size. If the one size concept is true then the components of elements would have a paired periodic progression and new elements would be created by the simple equation 2 +2 = 4 +2 = 6 +2 = 8 Prior Element Units Plus two equals next element. In reality however, it appears that the current accepted periodic table should be split in two and every other element having its own Periodic table. One Table would have a core of Hydrogen and adding four progressively and the other a core of Tritium and adding four progressively. The pages on this web site correlate known measurements to the above concept and the predictability that results. . |
 |
| <<<<<<CLICK THE COMPUTER FOR THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, COMPONENT CORRELATED. PERIODIC TABLE ON THE WEB. PROTON/NEUTRON ISOTOPE CORRELATION |
| THE PURPOSE OF THIS SITE |
| TO CHALLENGE AND ILLUSTRATE THAT MANY ACCEPTED CHEMISTRY VALUES AND STATEMENTS ARE NOT TRUE. ACCESS THE LINKS BELOW FOR THREE OF THE MAJOR DISCREPANCIES |
| NEUTRONS ARE ADDED RANDOMLY TO FORM ELEMENTS -- SITE ILLUSTRATES THAT NEUTRONS ARE ADDED IN A PERIODIC PROGRESSION. |
| ALL ELEMENTS ARE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE CURRENT ACCEPTED PERIODIC TABLE sITE ILLUSTRATES THAT: AN ADDITIONAL 4 UNACKNOWLEDGED ELEMENTS EXIST WITHIN THE ACCEPTED PERIODIC TABLE |
| ELEMENTS BEYOND LAWRENCIUM HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED. SITE ILLUSTRATES THAT THE CLAIMED ELEMENT DISCOVERIES ARE NOT NEW ELEMENTS BUT SIMPLY ISOTOPES OF LAWRENCIUM. |
| <<Click to Order "Mowery's latest books" |