PERIODIC PAIRED NEUTRON TABLE OF ELEMENTS |
Copyright 1993, 1997, Jan 18. 2003 by Gerald E. Mowery No Claim made on Government Information |
CLINK LINKS BELOW FOR ORIGINATING PAGES |
7th ENERGY LEVEL |
Rf 263 ===== Db 265 ===== SG 267 ====== Bh 269 ====== HS 271 ====== |
Rf 262 ===== Db 264 ===== SG 266 ====== Bh 268 ====== HS 270 ====== |
Rf 261 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = |
Rf 260 ===== Db 262 ===== SG 264 ====== Bh 266 ====== HS 268 ====== |
Rf 258 ===== Db 260 ===== SG 262 ====== Bh 264 ====== HS 266 ====== |
Rf 256 ===== Db 258 ===== SG 260 ====== Bh 262 ====== HS 264 ====== |
= = = = = = = Sg 263 = = = = = = = = |
= = = = = = = = = = = = = Hs 265 === |
THE CHART BELOW ILLUSTRATES THAT THESE ELEMENTS ARE ISOTOPES OF LAWRENCIUM AND ARE NOT NEWLY DISCOVERED ELEMENTS |
Elements progress in units of Two not One |
HAVE NEWLY DISCOVERED EXTENDED ELEMENTS (114) (115) ETC. ACTUALLY BEEN DISCOVERED OR IS MEASUREMENTS IN ERROR? |
THIS PAGE CHALLENGES THE CLAIM MADE FOR NEW ELEMENT DISCOVERIES FROM 114 AND BEYOND. ------------ Periodic Neutron progression (Of all prior elements) indicates that the illustrations are only the isotopes of Lawrencium, and not elements. THE CONFIGURATIONS OF ELEMENTS ARE PAIRED WITH THEMSELVES AND PROGRESS IN UNITS OF TWO ATOMIC MASS. THE CLAIMED ATOMIC MASS --- OF NEWLY DISCOVERED ELEMENTS -- PROGRESSES IN UNITS OF ONE. IN ADDITION ( EVERY OTHER ELEMENT ) WITHIN THE TABLE, SHOULD HAVE AN ATOMIC MASS WITH AN ODD AMOUNT ISOTOPE. Only one exception exists and that is THORIUM Atomic Mass -- 230.0331. and 232.03805. Missing the Odd amount isotope Between the two. If one had created true elements, the Progression would have been an odd and even periodic progression No quarrel is made with Rf -- for that element could have isotopes 261 and 263. However Db must be an Odd Number and progressive from 263 to 265 Sg must have both Odd and Even amount isotopes with a 267 isotope Bh must be an Odd number and progressive to 269. Hs must have both odd and even amount isotopes with 271 as odd amount isotope. None of the reported discoveries reflect this absolute progression in the relationship of elements. Of course it is entirely possible that the proposed stable isotope could immediately decay into the atomic mass indicated. |
THE PINK ENTRIES BELOW REFLECT THE EXPECTED PERIODIC PROGRESSSON OF CLAIMED NEW ELEMENTS. |
Rf 264 ===== Db 266 ===== SG 268 ====== Bh 270 ====== HS 272 ====== |
Progression of ONE does not create an element in the entire periodic table. The progression (in red) illustrates the progression is simply an isotope of Lawrencium. |
Click below to return to your favorite search engine. |