Method:
1) A Kodak pantone color sample was
shot at ISO 80, 160, 320 with (A) No filter, (B) UV Multicoat, (C) non
coated Plain Circ-Polarizer. Shots were taken under Incandescent
lighting with a Manual WB, using P-mode, 0 exposure compensation, and zoomed
at 36mm(140mm equiv). All images were recorded using SHQ at 5mp and 1:2.7 JPG compression. Artifacts could be a factor, but results are relative to each other so artifacts weren't seen as a handicap.
2) Mean, Median and standard deviation measurements were taken from
nine 2340 pixel-sized areas of each image (see green boxes of the example
pantone)
3) Additionally, since histograms on E20 showed that the exposure for
all shots was slightly under, a +0.7 exposure compensation was taken at
ISO80 without filter for comparison.
Results:
The ISO 80 data can be viewed here. Or downloaded as an Excel 97 spreadsheet here.
Image swath comparison is here for a qualitative view. (The TIF version of the swaths is linked here.)
Conclusions:
1. The addition of a UV filter changed the exposure from 1/80 to 1/50, but the mean was raised using the filter by roughly 25-30%. Perhaps a shutter of 1/60 should have been used for the filter.
2. The UV filter gives mixed results at ISO80: noise seems to raise on the RGB swaths, but not as much or even lowers on the CYM and Grey swaths. Results seem to indicate a nearly imperceptible increase in noise when using the UV filter.
3.The Polarizer cut the exposure of the UV filter by two (expected) but maintained a mean closer to the No Filter image, indicating that it reduces the overall exposure to about a third. The blue channel for yellow swaths, however, seems to be more efficient than the others, suggesting the polarizer is passing more efficiently on the blue end (expected).
4. The Polarizer does not seem to substantially increase the noise
in most swaths except Blue and Green, where it is increased by almost 20-30%.
The Cyan swath, surprisingly, did not increase. Results seem
to indicate skynoise will increase with the use of a polarizer, seemingly
because it absorbs more on the red end.