Subject: Constituent Request with Cc to Speaker, Sen. President
Date:
3/8/2005 12:44:15 A.M. Eastern Standard Time

From: Gww1210@aol.com [Gordon Wayne Watts]
To: Stargel.John@MyFloridaHouse.com, Speaker@MyFloridaHouse.com, Bense.Allan@MyFloridaHouse.gov, Lee.Tom.web@FLSenate.gov
CC: Barnes.Rachel@MyFloridaHouse.com, Bryant.Robyn@MyFloridaHouse.com, Brown.Sharron@MyFloridaHouse.com, Weatherford.Will@MyFloridaHouse.com, Butchikas.Patti@MyFloridaHouse.com, Simmons.Becky.S10@FLSenate.gov, Fletcher.Dee.S10@FLSenate.gov, Anderson.Charlie.S10@FLSenate.gov


SUBJECT: Constituent Request with Cc to Speaker, Sen. President
 
Notes: This is in text form below -plus the request is attached as a Microsoft Word document, which is approximately 200.1 KB and 9 or 10 pages, depending on your version of word-processing software.
 
While there is no intention of viruses, it is **STRONGLY** recommended that either the recipient be content with the text version below (and print it out) -or, after downloading the e-mail attachment enclosed, please scan with an *updated* version of your favorite virus software, and then, if no infections are found, I would give my seal of approval to open.
 
This *will not* infect your computer, but it *will* infect your brain -with the truth. PS: Careful - The truth is very infectious!
 
GW

From the Desk of:

Gordon W. Watts

821 Alicia Road

Lakeland, FL 33801-2113

(863) 688-9880

Gww1210@aol.com

http://GordonWatts.com

 

John K. Stargel                                                          

State Representative, Florida District 64                        District Office: 

                                                                                    902 South Florida Avenue

Capitol Office:                                                              Lakeland, FL 33803-1149

209 House Office Building                                               Phone: (863) 413-2877

402 South Monroe Street                                                or

Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300                                           PO Box 2009

Phone: (850) 488-2270                                                   Lakeland, FL 33806-2009

                                                                                   

                                                                                    Monday, 07 March 2005

 

Subject: Constituent Request: Art. III, Sect. 17 Impeachment Proceedings

 

Dear Representative Stargel:

 

It is with regret that I would make this request of you, but I must act on my understanding of your responsibilities and representation as mandated by the constitution and our state and federal laws. We all want a fair day in court, but history has taught us those activists judges exist who do not follow the law. Further, if these renegades are not reigned in, then your office can write tall laws, short laws, fat laws, or skinny laws –or even “new and improved” laws, for these maverick meddlers will see to it that the state laws are not utilized, but, instead, re-written from the bench (a constitutional no-no) –and will give the term “unjust judges” new meaning.

 

I note that your office is, among other things, charged with certain “checks and balances” responsibilities outlined in the current State of Florida Constitution, some of them quite important. (I shall prove below that, should we fail, it will make it more likely that injured Floridians, who are not terminally ill, can be illegally slammed into hospice –in violation of chapter 400, and denied proper medical care in these facilities, which are not set up for long term medical or rehabilitative care.)

 

One such responsibility is the impeachment, outlined in subsection (a) and which holds that “…justices of the supreme court, judges of district courts of appeal, judges of circuit courts, and judges of county courts shall be liable to impeachment for misdemeanor in office. The house of representatives by two-thirds vote shall have the power to impeach an officer. The speaker of the house of representatives shall have power at any time to appoint a committee to investigate charges against any officer subject to impeachment.”

 

In this context, it would seem reasonable that a felony should also disqualify a sitting judge, because the Equal Protection clause in the State and US constitutions would be repugnant to treating a felony violator any better than a violator of a misdemeanor.

 

As you know, you have made attempts to save Theresa “Terri” Schiavo’s life by introducing a law, commonly known as Terri’s Law, and any further action on your part to help Terri would no doubt bring into question whether your actions are biased or motivated by revenge, regarding the law recently being struck down by the courts, so I would not expect you to act on your own to do anything on this matter.

 

However, as you know, I recently filed a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, directed at the illegal detention of Terri, who, while not “terminal,” is nonetheless illegally imprisoned in a hospice, which is statutorily prohibited from admitting patients who are not terminally ill. My petition was eventually turned down by Florida’s Supreme Court, but I was voted down merely by a 4-3 vote (see enclosed), which, compared to the Governor’s recent 7-0 loss on a similar measure before the same state court, stands as good evidence that I am well-versed on the subject -and some believe -more qualified than the Governor‘s legal team, which sought the enactment of a very controversial law when current laws would have furthered their purported goal of protecting the handicapped and disabled -and that with probably less controversy or hardship. Therefore, I would be as qualified as any constituent to make a formal request for legislative representations on this subject.

 

Additionally, I am a constituent in your legislative district (not the district of another representative) in your capacity of Florida State Representative. (Many other voices have called for the impeachment of Judge George Greer and other judges involved in the Schiavo miscarriage of justice: In Google.com alone, 936 web sites exist along those lines! See enclosed.)

 

As outlined in my court petitions, several appellate and circuit judges either allowed (conspired) or outright committed violations of state law, in some cases, felony. This is a serious charge, and I don’t easily make it, but the facts support me, so I proceed, first with minor charges:

 

1) Oath of office and qualifying statement for running in a race per elections laws:

There are reports that Circuit Judge, George W. Greer has not qualified for office by filling out the statutorily required “oaths of office,” which, as you know, can not be done after the fact to correct in a “nunc pro tunc” fashion. While I have made fun of this type of technicality, a man named Ward Churchill, of the University of Colorado, was recently in very big trouble for not having a record of having filled out his oath of office:

 

§876.07,Fla.Stats., Oath as prerequisite to qualification for public office.--Any person seeking to qualify for public office who fails or refuses to file the oath required by this act shall be held to have failed to qualify as a candidate for public office, and the name of such person shall not be printed on the ballot as a qualified candidate.

 

“According to public records, George W. Greer, the judge at the center of Terri Schindler-Schiavo saga, not only failed to timely file the proper candidate and loyalty oaths in the proper form, he allegedly violated Florida statutes and failed to qualify for office and therefore, his name could not legally appear on the Florida ballot in 1998 and 2004 when he claims he was elected.

 

[Editorial comment on quote here: This is a very important 2nd point. –GW Watts] Even if one were to cast the oath argument aside, a review of the public records and confirmation by assistant general counsel in the Florida Secretary of State’s office has confirmed that Greer did not qualify for office because he did not file the statement of candidate for judicial office that is required in order to qualify to gain access to the ballot.” (THE EMPIRE JOURNAL: News and Issues Every New Yorker Must Know)

 

http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/2005/articles02/records.htm quoting:

http://www.theempirejournal.com/0219056_gov.htm

 

Cf.: §106.023,Fla.Stats., Statement of candidate.--  (1)  Each candidate must file a statement with the qualifying officer within 10 days after filing the appointment of campaign treasurer and designation of campaign depository, stating that the candidate has read and understands the requirements of this chapter. Such statement shall be provided by the filing officer and shall be in substantially the following form:

 

STATEMENT OF CANDIDATE

I, _____, candidate for the office of _____, have received, read, and understand the requirements of Chapter 106, Florida Statutes.

 (Signature of candidate)                                                                       (Date)

 

Willful failure to file this form is a violation of ss. 106.19(1)(c) and 106.25(3), F.S. [Editor: The former, which is emphasized in bold face, a misdemeanor.]

 

§106.19,Fla.Stats., Violations by candidates, persons connected with campaigns, and political committees.--  (1)  Any candidate; campaign manager, campaign treasurer, or deputy treasurer of any candidate; committee chair, vice chair, campaign treasurer, deputy treasurer, or other officer of any political committee; agent or person acting on behalf of any candidate or political committee; or other person who knowingly and willfully: (c)  Falsely reports or deliberately fails to include any information required by this chapter…is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. [Emphasis supplied.]

 

2) Possible conflicts of interests and/or ex parte statements to participants and/or press regarding a case under review:

There are published reports of conflicts of interest centering on Judge George W. Greer’s connection to the Woodside Hospice or other parties that would require him to recuse himself from the Schiavo case:

 

“According to Ron Panzer of the Hospice Patients Alliance, Judge Greer should recuse himself because of connections with Michael Schiavo’s pro-euthanasia attorney George Felos.” (Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc.,  A Voice for Private Physicians Since 1943)

http://www.aapsonline.org/nod/newsofday76.htm

 

“Rice and Carassas are also even more directly involved in the Schiavo case, having been involved in alleged prohibited ex parte private conversations with Greer concerning the Schiavo case which resulted in attorneys for Terri’s parents moving for Greer’s recusal in the matter. Greer refused to recuse himself.”

http://www.theempirejournal.com/030105091_schiavo_judge_greer_su.htm

 

The trial judge, Greer, has refused to act upon the conflict of interest of George Felos, an attorney on the case: “Now Felos only stepped down from being chairman of the board of the hospice…"to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest!"”

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Terri_felos.htm  

 

This is relevant because attorney Felos (who had at one point a conflict of interest) played a role in illegally placing Terri, a non-terminal person, in hospice care, in violation of chapter 400 laws -and the judges above him -even to the appellate level -have refused to correct this, thus subjecting them to aiding and abetting the commission of a chapter 400 crime under Florida State Law:

 

The judicial branch, widely regarded as the weakest branch, is not constitutionally permitted to write law from the bench; While many have suggested that errors by judges be corrected by appealing them to the higher courts, the problem is so widespread that this line of reasoning is faulty: Unjust judges, who suck down tax dollars and return inequitable and unfair judgments, must be impeached, according the constitutional mandate.

 

While I am uncertain of the validity of most of the charges above, here are the “heavy-hitting” charges, many of them felony, and I stand by the allegations I make below:

 

3) Illegal placement -and retention -in hospice:

As mentioned above, §400.6095(2), Fla.Stats. prohibits placement of Terri in a hospice: “Admission to a hospice program shall be made upon a diagnosis and prognosis of terminal illness by a physician licensed pursuant to chapter 458 or chapter 459...,” which, according to Federal authorities: “The certification must specify that the individual’s prognosis is for a life expectancy of 6 months or less if the terminal illness runs its normal course,” (42C.F.R.§418.22(b)), is six (6) months -or less:

http://www.dsf.health.state.pa.us/health/lib/health/Hospice_Medicare_Regulations_2003.PDF

 

Wake up call: Terri was admitted to Hospice care in April of 2000:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schiavo+april+2000

 

That is like five (5) years later: Clearly, she was not terminal when she was admitted. (I mean, what is to prevent some judge or lawyer from taking an injured, sick, or disabled person -with, say, a speech impediment -and shoving this person into a hospice and then subjecting them to the substandard care of a hospice, which is only set up for end-of-life issues, when they need the medical care of a regular facility? Would you like it if you were illegally shoved into a hospice after a routine hospital stay?) This alone is criminal and reason to impeach.

 

4) Denial of counsel in court and willful and purposeful illegal acting as guardian -deprivation of representation of handicapped ward:

The judge has continually denied Terri counsel in court, an act prohibited by §744.3215(1)(l),Fla.Stats., and, instead, has acted as her counsel and guardian himself, and act prohibited by §744.309(1)(b),Fla.Stats. Even a criminal (see, e.g., Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)) gets a lawyer, but he would deny her basic due process:

 

§744.3215,Fla.Stats., Rights of persons determined incapacitated.-- (1)  A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right: (l)  To counsel.

 

(Note: These “retained” rights are not to be confused with rights that may be removed: Sue and defend, such as §744.3215(3)(b),Fla.Stats.)

 

§744.309(1)(b),Fla.Stats., No judge shall act as guardian after this law becomes effective, except when he or she is related to the ward by blood, marriage, or adoption, or has maintained a close relationship with the ward or the ward's family, and serves without compensation.

 

The judge acted illegally by being both “neutral adjudicator” and also representative and counsel -all the while, denying ward true counsel, protected by state law and implied by federal case law in Gideon, if we  are to believe in “Equal Protection,” that is, that crippled people are due at least as much protection as criminal killers.

 

What if you or I interfered in court proceedings and prevented a person from being appointed a counsel in court -in a life-or-death case? Would this not be at least criminal contempt of court? This alone is reason to impeach: Otherwise, no matter whether you write “tall laws, short laws, fat laws, skinny laws,” it won’t matter: Any law would be disobeyed at any time by any judge.

 

This criminal interference and contempt, and this alone is reason to impeach.

 

Is it not true that Judge Greer prohibited (and the 2nd District Court of Appeal conspired to permit) the denial of basic therapies and rehabilitation of one Theresa Marie Schiavo?

 

http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/Order%20Denying%20Pet%20Immed%20Ther%20091703.pdf

 

Is not denial of speech therapy and physical therapy a violation of state law?

 

§744.3215, Fla.Stats., Rights of persons determined incapacitated.-- (1)  A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right: (c) To be restored to capacity at the earliest possible time, (d) To be treated humanely, with dignity and respect, and to be protected against abuse, neglect, and exploitation, and (i) To receive necessary services and rehabilitation.

 

Why obey the law when you can get away with it? This is probably criminal (felony) abuse and neglect within the meaning of chapter 825.102, and definitely against the law -reason to impeach the appeals court judges who conspired to permit this:

 

§825.102, Fla.Stats., Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties.-- (1)  "Abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult" means:

(a)  Intentional infliction of physical or psychological injury upon an elderly person or disabled adult; [Editor: Terri probably was injured.]

(b)  An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or psychological injury to an elderly person or disabled adult; [Ed.: This seems reasonable.] or

(c)  Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or psychological injury to an elderly person or disabled adult. [Ed.: This subsection could apply to the appeals court judges, who encouraged the trial court judge to so do.]

 

5) Collusion and conspiracy to perform same with an “organization” of judges, who stick together to defeat the rule of law and form of government as we know it:

The trial judges, the lawyers for Mike Schiavo, and the appeals court judges certainly conspired together to perform these acts, and these acts are illegal. This raises the specter of a statute, which, when I first saw it, thought to not take it seriously, but it applies:

 

Chapter 876

CRIMINAL ANARCHY, TREASON, AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER

§876.02,Fla.Stats., Criminal anarchy, Communism, and other specified doctrines; prohibitions.--Any person who:

(1)  By word of mouth or writing advocates, advises…of disobeying or sabotaging or hindering the carrying out of the [Florida State] laws…or

(4)  Organizes or helps to organize or becomes a member of any society, group, or assembly of persons [such as the appeals court] formed to teach or advocate such doctrines…

shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. [Ed. Emphasis supplied.]

 

§876.33,Fla.Stats., Misprision of treason.--Whoever having knowledge of the commission of treason conceals the same and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known such treason to the Governor or one of the justices of the Supreme Court or a judge of the circuit court, shall be judged guilty of the offense of misprision of treason, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

 

§876.48,Fla.Stats., Relation to other statutes.--All laws and parts of laws inconsistent with ss. 876.37-876.51 are hereby suspended in their application to any proceedings under said sections. If conduct prohibited by said sections is also made unlawful by another or other laws, the offender may be convicted for the violation of said sections or of any other law or laws.

 

Translation in Plain English: Conspiracy to violate the state’s laws is prohibited, and I have not even hit upon the serious charges. Now, how about some felonies as initial charges:

 

6) Felony financial fraud -conspiracy to aid and abet:

When a previously litigated and decided medical malpractice suit found that “Terri’s wishes” (and needs) were that she get close to a million dollars for an award, were parties allowed to misappropriate funds protected by §744.3215,Fla.Stats., “Rights of persons determined incapacitated.-- (1)  A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right: (h)  To receive prudent financial management for his or her property…”?

 

Answer: No. 744.446,Fla.Stats., Conflicts of interest; prohibited activities; court approval; breach of fiduciary duty.-- (4)  In the event of a breach by the guardian of the guardian's fiduciary duty, the court SHALL take those necessary actions to protect the ward and the ward's assets. [Emphasis added.]

 

§744.474,Fla.Stats., Reasons for removal of guardian.--A guardian may be removed for any of the following reasons, and the removal shall be in addition to any other penalties prescribed by law:

(7)  The wasting, embezzlement, or other mismanagement of the ward's property.

(16)  The improper management of the ward's assets.

 

§825.103,Fla.Stats., Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties.--

(1)  "Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult" means: (a)  Knowingly, by deception or intimidation, obtaining or using, or endeavoring to obtain or use, an elderly person's or disabled adult's funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly person or disabled adult, by a person who:

1.  Stands in a position of trust and confidence with the elderly person or disabled adult; or

2.  Has a business relationship with the elderly person or disabled adult…

(2)(a)  If the funds, assets, or property involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued at $100,000 or more, the offender commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. [Emphasis added.]

 

7) Felony abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly, vulnerable, and/or disabled:

Finally, the felonies regarding financial fraud are not to be compared with felonies regarding physical health -although these felony financial fraudulent actions alone are reason to toss a judge -or a group of judges who might allow this.

 

Although the court orders only spoke to the removal of the feeding tube, the judge permitted the denial of oral food and water and necessary medical services, such as basic antibiotics, when Theresa had a urinary tract infection.

 

Documentation: “To date, the husband has refused such care as antibiotics, dental work, repairing a broken wheelchair so she could go outdoors and the delivery of flowers to her room.”

(Not Dead Yet: http://www.notdeadyet.org/docs/shiavoday1.html )

 

“In the 1992 malpractice trial, Schiavo argued he needed the money for long-term care for his wife, based on a life expectancy of another 50 years. But seven months after receiving the cash, the Schindlers argue, he began to withhold care and therapy, first ordering nurses to not give Terri antibiotics for a urinary tract infection, which could have resulted in her death.”

(World Net Daily: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43026 ) 

 

We all know that Greer and other judges denied oral food, but here is a quote: “Five months following their banishment from the Hospice, Bobby and Suzanne Schindler had their visiting rights restored, but only on condition that they not attempt any spoon-feeding.

 

"I don't want anyone trying to feed that girl," Greer thundered.”

(Source: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35077 )

 

While Theresa could have died from basic infections, like third world country citizens -and while this young woman of about forty lost five or more teeth due to care (or lack), all under the care of a court while allowed mistreatment, we wonder was this legal?

 

It is a matter of public record that Terri was denied not only the feeding tube, but also oral food and water; It is also a matter of public record that Terri could eat Jell-O, and that it is believed that she can swallow her own saliva.

 

The judge prohibited not only therapy and rehab -but also examination by doctors. I wonder what he was hiding. However, let me not get off-topic and side-tracked:

 

 The 2004 Florida Statutes - Title XLVI - CRIMES Chapter 825

ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION OF ELDERLY PERSONS AND DISABLED ADULTS §825.102,Fla.Stats., Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties.--  (3)(a)  "Neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult" means:  1.  A caregiver's failure or  omission to provide an elderly person or disabled adult with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain the elderly person's or disabled adult's physical and mental health, including, but not limited to, FOOD,  nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, MEDICINE, and medical services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the elderly person or disabled adult…(b)  A person who willfully or by culpable negligence neglects an elderly person or disabled adult and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the elderly person or disabled adult commits a felony of the second degree… (c)  A person who willfully or by culpable negligence neglects an elderly person or disabled adult without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the elderly person or disabled adult commits a felony of the third degree…

 

Representative Stargel, many people have said that Terri can’t eat or drink, and that it would be OK to deny her oral food and water; however, their logic would be flawed for two reasons:

 

1) Terri, as many witnesses and medical experts have testified, can indeed eat and drink to some limited degree; and,

2) Even were she to not be able to eat, it would be a felony violation of this chapter to not at least try: Her life is on the line.

 

Dehydration would occur before starvation, and as Kate Adamson and Rev. Rus Cooper-Dowda have testified, very, very painful!

 

These violations of law normally land the abuser in prison, whether the victim is a cat, a criminal on death row, or a handicapped or elderly citizen.

 

However, these judges seem to think they are above the law; this felony crime of neglect on the part of the judges involved would alone be reason to impeach. Since it is apparent that the judges involved have played some part in intimidating local law enforcement agencies to not take reports on this case or consider the bone scan records which were initially hidden (illegal refusal of “discovery” of evidence), then this smacks of conspiracy, however, I would not be so ready to accuse all the judges of influencing the local police agencies, yet, some influence is obvious. Can the FDLE (Florida Department of Law Enforcement) not outright arrest said judges on charges of chapter 876 conspiracies?

 

Why would the judges involved be in a rush to illegally deny medical services and oral food and water to Theresa, deny her speech therapy to suppress her possible testimony of alleged spousal abuse, and then make a rush to cremate her and preclude and avoid an autopsy? Was this not to hide evidence of wrongdoing and cover incompetence or a possible conspiracy to perform illegal acts? Why does the judge continue to allow Mike Schiavo to be in contempt of court and at the same time attempt to stop a lawful and legal investigation by the Department of Children and Families (DCF)?

 

Do the recent recoveries of people once thought to be “PVS” not give rise to thought that maybe we could be wrong to quickly declare a person “hopeless?” E.g., Sarah Scantlin, a Kansas woman, who is coming out of a 20-year coma, proves "PVS" is not certain. Thus, ward Theresa Schiavo is not valueless and petition herein is valid.

( http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0035531.cfm , Brain Damaged Woman Speaks after 20 Years, by Stuart Shepard, correspondent)

 

In light of the legal definitions of “PVS,” which the courts clearly violated in making their unjust judgments (Terri obviously has “some” cognitive behavior, obvious to a schoolchild), what is the mindset of the judges? To uphold -or to violate -the law?

 

§765.101(12),Fla.Stats., "Persistent vegetative state" means a permanent and irreversible condition of unconsciousness in which there is:  (a)  The absence of voluntary action or cognitive behavior of ANY kind. [Emphasis supplied.] I.e., The judges have purposely violated this law by not applying its plain language to the cases.

 

Summarizing:

1) Oath of office and qualifying statement for running in a race per elections laws.

2) Possible conflicts of interests and/or ex parte statements to participants and/or press regarding a case under review.

3) Illegal placement -and retention -in hospice.

4) Denial of counsel in court and willful and purposeful illegal acting as guardian -deprivation of representation of handicapped ward.

5) Collusion and conspiracy to perform same with an “organization” of judges, who stick together to defeat the rule of law and form of government as we know it.

6) Felony financial fraud -conspiracy to aid and abet.

7) Felony abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly, vulnerable, and/or disabled.

 

It is my estimation that any one of these violations -if found to be true (with the possible exception of number two above) would -all by itself -be justification to impeach. It is also my estimation that many judges have violated many laws in my 7 points of summary above.

 

It is also my studied and reasoned judgment, based on professional experience and the maturity that comes from education in several disciplines, that there is undisputed evidence to substantiate the allegations made in items 3-7, any one of which, if true, would justify impeachment of a number of judges who, effectively, conspired to undermine our form of government, in which the people, through our elected representatives, write law, with a system of checks and balances. The result will be that you could be slammed into hospice, whether terminal or not, and denied basic medical care, such as antibiotics, or even oral food –not to be confused with a feeding tube:

 

“Marjorie Nighbert signed an “advance directive” before she was hospitalized for a stroke in 1996. This document stated that she desired no “heroic measures.” Based on this, her family requested that her feeding tube be removed. When Ms. Nighbert begged for food, the courts deemed her 'not medically competent to ask for such a treatment,' and the hospital physically restrained her in bed so that she could not pilfer food from other patients. She died ten days later.” {Note: This citation from the Catholic Culture website was verified as correct from numerous independent sources, not the least of which is Focus on the Family.} Source: http://www.CatholicCulture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=5524

 

That is, it is my estimation that a number of judges have conspired to break the law and should, as an obligation to our state and federal constitutions, be impeached, pursuant to Article III, Section 17 of the State Constitution. (It’s within your reach: You must impeach.) Am I right in my claims that activist judges exist who do not follow the law? We all want a fair day in court; if we don’t learn from history, then history will repeat itself. Thank you for your speedy answer. Are my estimations above correct?

 

            With kind regards, I am sincerely,

                                   

                                    __________________

                                    Gordon Wayne Watts

                                    http://GordonWatts.com

                                    Gww1210@aol.com

                                    821 Alicia Road

                                    Lakeland, FL 33801-2113

                                    (863) 688-9880 / (863) 686-3411 / (863) 686-3411

 
Gordon Wayne Watts http://GordonWatts.com
BS, The Florida State University, Biological and Chemical Sciences
AS, United Electronics Institute

A
LWAYS FAITHFUL - To God
And God bless my friends who made me this picture.

821 Alicia Road, Lakeland,
FLA, USA 33801-2113 http://HomeTown.AOL.com/Gww1210 or http://www.GeoCities.com/Gordon_Watts32313
Home: (863) 688-9880 Work: (863) 686-3411 Voice&FAX: (863) 687-6141
Gww1210@aol.com ; Gww12102002@Yahoo.com
Truth is the strongest, most stable force in the Universe.

TRUTH doesn't bend to the will of tyrants.

Gordon Wayne Watts

Get Truth.


"First, they [Nazis] came for the Jews. I was silent. I was not a Jew. Then they came for the Communists. I was silent. I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists. I was silent. I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for me. There was no one left to speak for me." (Martin Niemoller, given credit for a quotation in The Harper Religious and Inspirational Quotation Companion, ed. Margaret Pepper (New York: Harper &Row, 1989), 429 -as cited on page 44, note 17, of Religious Cleansing in the American Republic, by Keith A. Fornier, Copyright 1993, by Liberty, Life, and Family Publications.


(Actually, they may not have come for the Jews first, as it's far more likely they came for the prisoners, mentally handicapped, and other so-called "inferiors" first -as historians tell us -so they could get "practiced up;" But, they did come for them -due to the silence of their neighbors -and due, in part, to their own silence. So the general idea is correct: "Speak up now, or forever hold your peace." --Gordon)

*

*