Subject: Constituent Request with Cc to Speaker, Sen. President
Date: 3/8/2005 12:44:15 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From: Gww1210@aol.com [Gordon Wayne Watts]
To: Stargel.John@MyFloridaHouse.com, Speaker@MyFloridaHouse.com, Bense.Allan@MyFloridaHouse.gov,
Lee.Tom.web@FLSenate.gov
CC: Barnes.Rachel@MyFloridaHouse.com, Bryant.Robyn@MyFloridaHouse.com, Brown.Sharron@MyFloridaHouse.com,
Weatherford.Will@MyFloridaHouse.com, Butchikas.Patti@MyFloridaHouse.com, Simmons.Becky.S10@FLSenate.gov, Fletcher.Dee.S10@FLSenate.gov,
Anderson.Charlie.S10@FLSenate.gov
From the Desk of:
Gordon W. Watts
(863) 688-9880
John K. Stargel
State Representative, Florida District 64 District Office:
Capitol Office:
209
Phone: (850) 488-2270
Monday, 07 March 2005
Subject: Constituent
Request: Art. III, Sect. 17 Impeachment
Proceedings
Dear Representative
Stargel:
It is with regret that I would make this request of
you, but I must act on my understanding of your responsibilities and
representation as mandated by the constitution and our state and federal laws.
We all want a fair day in court, but history has taught us those activists
judges exist who do not follow the law. Further, if these renegades are not
reigned in, then your office can write tall laws, short laws, fat laws, or
skinny laws –or even “new and improved” laws, for these maverick meddlers will
see to it that the state laws are not utilized, but, instead, re-written from
the bench (a constitutional no-no) –and will give the term “unjust judges” new
meaning.
I note that your office
is, among other things, charged with certain “checks and balances”
responsibilities outlined in the current State of
One such responsibility
is the impeachment, outlined in subsection (a) and which holds that “…justices
of the supreme court, judges of district courts of appeal, judges of circuit
courts, and judges of county courts shall be liable to impeachment for
misdemeanor in office. The house of representatives by two-thirds vote shall
have the power to impeach an officer. The speaker of the house of
representatives shall have power at any time to appoint a committee to
investigate charges against any officer subject to
impeachment.”
In this context, it would
seem reasonable that a felony should also disqualify a sitting judge, because
the Equal Protection clause in the State and US constitutions would be
repugnant to treating a felony violator any better than a violator of a
misdemeanor.
As you know, you have
made attempts to save Theresa “Terri” Schiavo’s life by introducing a law,
commonly known as Terri’s Law, and any further action on your part to help
Terri would no doubt bring into question whether your actions are biased or
motivated by revenge, regarding the law recently being struck down by the
courts, so I would not expect you to act on your own to do anything on this
matter.
However, as you know, I
recently filed a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, directed at the illegal
detention of Terri, who, while not “terminal,” is nonetheless illegally
imprisoned in a hospice, which is statutorily prohibited from admitting
patients who are not terminally ill. My petition was eventually turned down by
Florida’s Supreme Court, but I was voted down merely by a 4-3 vote (see
enclosed), which, compared to the Governor’s recent 7-0 loss on a similar
measure before the same state court, stands as good evidence that I am
well-versed on the subject -and some believe -more qualified than the
Governor‘s legal team, which sought the enactment of a very controversial law
when current laws would have furthered their purported goal of protecting the
handicapped and disabled -and that with probably less controversy or hardship.
Therefore, I would be as qualified as any constituent to make a formal request
for legislative representations on this subject.
Additionally, I am a
constituent in your legislative district (not the district of another
representative) in your capacity of Florida State Representative. (Many other
voices have called for the impeachment of Judge George Greer and other judges
involved in the Schiavo miscarriage of justice: In Google.com alone,
936 web sites exist along those lines! See
enclosed.)
As outlined in my court
petitions, several appellate and circuit judges either allowed (conspired) or
outright committed violations of state law, in some cases, felony.
This is a serious charge, and I don’t easily make it, but the facts
support me, so I proceed, first with minor
charges:
1) Oath of office
and qualifying statement for running in a race per elections
laws:
There are reports that
Circuit Judge, George W. Greer has not qualified for office by filling out the
statutorily required “oaths of office,” which, as you know, can not be done
after the fact to correct in a “nunc pro tunc” fashion. While I have made fun
of this type of technicality, a man named Ward Churchill, of the
§876.07,Fla.Stats., Oath
as prerequisite to qualification for public office.--Any person seeking to
qualify for public office who fails or refuses to file the oath required by
this act shall be held to have failed to qualify as a candidate for public
office, and the name of such person shall not be printed on the ballot as a
qualified candidate.
“According to public
records, George W. Greer, the judge at the center of Terri Schindler-Schiavo
saga, not only failed to timely file the proper candidate and loyalty oaths in
the proper form, he allegedly violated Florida statutes and failed to qualify
for office and therefore, his name could not legally appear on the Florida
ballot in 1998 and 2004 when he claims he was
elected.
[Editorial
comment on quote here: This is a very important 2nd point. –GW
Watts] Even if one were to cast
the oath argument aside, a review of the public records and confirmation by
assistant general counsel in the Florida Secretary of State’s office has
confirmed that Greer did not qualify for office because he did not file the
statement of candidate for judicial office that is required in order to
qualify to gain access to the ballot.” (THE EMPIRE JOURNAL: News and Issues
Every New Yorker Must Know)
http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/2005/articles02/records.htm
quoting:
http://www.theempirejournal.com/0219056_gov.htm
Cf.: §106.023,Fla.Stats.,
Statement of candidate.--
(1) Each candidate must
file a statement with the qualifying officer within 10 days after filing the
appointment of campaign treasurer and designation of campaign depository,
stating that the candidate has read and understands the requirements of this
chapter. Such statement shall be provided by the filing officer and shall be
in substantially the following form:
STATEMENT OF
CANDIDATE
I, _____, candidate for
the office of _____, have received, read, and understand the requirements of
Chapter 106, Florida Statutes.
(Signature of candidate)
(Date)
Willful failure to file
this form is a violation of ss. 106.19(1)(c) and 106.25(3), F.S.
[Editor: The former, which is emphasized in bold face, a
misdemeanor.]
§106.19,Fla.Stats.,
Violations by candidates, persons connected with campaigns, and political
committees.-- (1) Any candidate; campaign manager,
campaign treasurer, or deputy treasurer of any candidate; committee chair,
vice chair, campaign treasurer, deputy treasurer, or other officer of any
political committee; agent or person acting on behalf of any candidate or
political committee; or other person who knowingly and willfully: (c) Falsely reports or deliberately fails
to include any information required by this chapter…is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or
s. 775.083. [Emphasis supplied.]
2) Possible conflicts of
interests and/or ex parte
statements to participants and/or press regarding a case under review:
There are published
reports of conflicts of interest centering on Judge George W. Greer’s
connection to the Woodside Hospice or other parties that would require him to
recuse himself from the Schiavo case:
“According to Ron Panzer
of the Hospice Patients Alliance, Judge Greer should recuse himself because of
connections with Michael Schiavo’s pro-euthanasia attorney George Felos.”
(Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc., A Voice for Private Physicians Since
1943)
http://www.aapsonline.org/nod/newsofday76.htm
“Rice and Carassas are
also even more directly involved in the Schiavo case, having been involved in
alleged prohibited ex parte private conversations with Greer concerning the
Schiavo case which resulted in attorneys for Terri’s parents moving for
Greer’s recusal in the matter. Greer refused to recuse himself.”
http://www.theempirejournal.com/030105091_schiavo_judge_greer_su.htm
The trial judge, Greer,
has refused to act upon the conflict of interest of George Felos, an attorney
on the case: “Now Felos only stepped down from being chairman of the board of
the hospice…"to avoid the appearance of a conflict of
interest!"”
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Terri_felos.htm
This is relevant because
attorney Felos (who had at one point a conflict of interest) played a role in
illegally placing Terri, a non-terminal person, in hospice care, in violation
of chapter 400 laws -and the judges above him -even to the appellate
level -have refused to correct this, thus subjecting them to aiding and
abetting the commission of a chapter 400 crime under Florida State
Law:
The judicial branch,
widely regarded as the weakest branch, is not constitutionally permitted to
write law from the bench; While many have suggested that errors by judges be
corrected by appealing them to the higher courts, the problem is so widespread
that this line of reasoning is faulty: Unjust judges, who suck down tax
dollars and return inequitable and unfair judgments, must be impeached,
according the constitutional mandate.
While I am uncertain of
the validity of most of the charges above, here are the “heavy-hitting”
charges, many of them felony, and I stand by the allegations I make
below:
3) Illegal placement -and
retention -in hospice:
As mentioned above,
§400.6095(2), Fla.Stats. prohibits placement of Terri in a hospice: “Admission
to a hospice program shall be made upon a diagnosis and prognosis of terminal
illness by a physician licensed pursuant to chapter 458 or chapter 459...,”
which, according to Federal authorities: “The certification must specify that
the individual’s prognosis is for a life expectancy of 6 months or less if the
terminal illness runs its normal course,” (42C.F.R.§418.22(b)), is six (6)
months -or less:
http://www.dsf.health.state.pa.us/health/lib/health/Hospice_Medicare_Regulations_2003.PDF
Wake up call: Terri was
admitted to Hospice care in April of 2000:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schiavo+april+2000
That is like five (5)
years later: Clearly, she was not terminal when she was admitted. (I mean,
what is to prevent some judge or lawyer from taking an injured, sick, or
disabled person -with, say, a speech impediment -and shoving this person into
a hospice and then subjecting them to the substandard care of a hospice, which
is only set up for end-of-life issues, when they need the medical care of a
regular facility? Would you like it if you were illegally shoved into a
hospice after a routine hospital stay?) This alone is criminal and reason to
impeach.
4) Denial of counsel in
court and willful and purposeful illegal acting as guardian -deprivation of
representation of handicapped ward:
The judge has continually
denied Terri counsel in court, an act prohibited by
§744.3215(1)(l),Fla.Stats., and, instead, has acted as her counsel and
guardian himself, and act prohibited by §744.309(1)(b),Fla.Stats. Even a
criminal (see, e.g., Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963))
gets a lawyer, but he would deny her basic due
process:
§744.3215,Fla.Stats.,
Rights of persons determined incapacitated.-- (1) A person who has been determined to be
incapacitated retains the right: (l)
To counsel.
(Note: These “retained”
rights are not to be confused with rights that may be removed: Sue and defend,
such as §744.3215(3)(b),Fla.Stats.)
§744.309(1)(b),Fla.Stats., No judge shall act as
guardian after this law becomes effective, except when he or she is related to
the ward by blood, marriage, or adoption, or has maintained a close
relationship with the ward or the ward's family, and serves without
compensation.
The judge acted illegally
by being both “neutral adjudicator” and also representative and counsel -all
the while, denying ward true counsel, protected by state law and implied by
federal case law in Gideon, if we are to believe in “Equal Protection,”
that is, that crippled people are due at least as much protection as criminal
killers.
What if you or I
interfered in court proceedings and prevented a person from being appointed a
counsel in court -in a life-or-death case? Would this not be at least criminal
contempt of court? This alone is reason to impeach: Otherwise, no matter
whether you write “tall laws, short laws, fat laws, skinny laws,” it won’t
matter: Any law would be disobeyed at any time by any
judge.
This criminal
interference and contempt, and this alone is reason to
impeach.
Is it not true that Judge
Greer prohibited (and the 2nd District Court of Appeal conspired to
permit) the denial of basic therapies and rehabilitation of one Theresa Marie
Schiavo?
http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/Order%20Denying%20Pet%20Immed%20Ther%20091703.pdf
Is not denial of speech
therapy and physical therapy a violation of state
law?
§744.3215, Fla.Stats.,
Rights of persons determined incapacitated.-- (1) A person who has been determined to be
incapacitated retains the right: (c) To be restored to capacity at the
earliest possible time, (d) To be treated humanely, with dignity and respect,
and to be protected against abuse, neglect, and exploitation, and (i) To
receive necessary services and rehabilitation.
Why obey the law when you
can get away with it? This is probably criminal (felony) abuse and neglect
within the meaning of chapter 825.102, and definitely against the law -reason
to impeach the appeals court judges who conspired to permit
this:
§825.102, Fla.Stats.,
Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult;
penalties.-- (1) "Abuse of an
elderly person or disabled adult" means:
(a) Intentional infliction of physical or
psychological injury upon an elderly person or disabled adult; [Editor: Terri
probably was injured.]
(b) An intentional act that could
reasonably be expected to result in physical or psychological injury to an
elderly person or disabled adult; [Ed.: This seems reasonable.] or
(c) Active encouragement of any person to
commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in
physical or psychological injury to an elderly person or disabled adult. [Ed.:
This subsection could apply to the appeals court judges, who encouraged the
trial court judge to so do.]
5) Collusion and
conspiracy to perform same with an “organization” of judges, who stick
together to defeat the rule of law and form of government as we know
it:
The trial judges, the
lawyers for Mike Schiavo, and the appeals court judges certainly conspired
together to perform these acts, and these acts are illegal. This raises the
specter of a statute, which, when I first saw it, thought to not take it
seriously, but it
applies:
Chapter
876
CRIMINAL ANARCHY,
TREASON, AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
§876.02,Fla.Stats.,
Criminal anarchy, Communism, and other specified doctrines; prohibitions.--Any
person who:
(1) By word of mouth or writing advocates,
advises…of disobeying or sabotaging or hindering the carrying out of the
[
(4) Organizes or helps to organize or
becomes a member of any society, group, or assembly of persons [such as the
appeals court] formed to teach or advocate such
doctrines…
shall be guilty of a
felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.
775.083, or s. 775.084. [Ed. Emphasis supplied.]
§876.33,Fla.Stats.,
Misprision of treason.--Whoever having knowledge of the commission of treason
conceals the same and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known
such treason to the Governor or one of the justices of the Supreme Court or a
judge of the circuit court, shall be judged guilty of the offense of
misprision of treason, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in
s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
§876.48,Fla.Stats.,
Relation to other statutes.--All laws and parts of laws inconsistent with ss.
876.37-876.51 are hereby suspended in their application to any proceedings
under said sections. If conduct prohibited by said sections is also made
unlawful by another or other laws, the offender may be convicted for the
violation of said sections or of any other law or
laws.
Translation in Plain
English: Conspiracy to violate the state’s laws is prohibited, and I have not
even hit upon the serious charges. Now, how about some felonies as initial
charges:
6) Felony financial fraud
-conspiracy to aid and abet:
When a previously
litigated and decided medical malpractice suit found that “Terri’s wishes”
(and needs) were that she get close to a million dollars for an award, were
parties allowed to misappropriate funds protected by §744.3215,Fla.Stats.,
“Rights of persons determined incapacitated.-- (1) A person who has been determined to be
incapacitated retains the right: (h)
To receive prudent financial management for his or her
property…”?
Answer: No.
744.446,Fla.Stats., Conflicts of interest; prohibited activities; court
approval; breach of fiduciary duty.-- (4) In the event of a breach by the
guardian of the guardian's fiduciary duty, the court SHALL take those
necessary actions to protect the ward and the ward's assets. [Emphasis
added.]
§744.474,Fla.Stats.,
Reasons for removal of guardian.--A guardian may be removed for any of the
following reasons, and the removal shall be in addition to any other penalties
prescribed by law:
(7) The wasting, embezzlement, or other
mismanagement of the ward's property.
(16) The improper management of the ward's
assets.
§825.103,Fla.Stats.,
Exploitation of an elderly person or disabled adult; penalties.--
(1) "Exploitation of an elderly person or
disabled adult" means: (a)
Knowingly, by deception or intimidation, obtaining or using, or
endeavoring to obtain or use, an elderly person's or disabled adult's funds,
assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the
elderly person or disabled adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the
funds, assets, or property, or to benefit someone other than the elderly
person or disabled adult, by a person who:
1. Stands in a position of trust and
confidence with the elderly person or disabled adult; or
2. Has a business relationship with the
elderly person or disabled adult…
(2)(a) If the funds, assets, or property
involved in the exploitation of the elderly person or disabled adult is valued
at $100,000 or more, the offender commits a felony of the first degree,
punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. [Emphasis
added.]
7) Felony abuse, neglect,
and exploitation of elderly, vulnerable, and/or
disabled:
Finally, the felonies
regarding financial fraud are not to be compared with felonies regarding
physical health -although these felony financial fraudulent actions alone are
reason to toss a judge -or a group of judges who might allow
this.
Although the court orders
only spoke to the removal of the feeding tube, the judge permitted the denial
of oral food and water and necessary medical services, such as basic
antibiotics, when Theresa had a urinary tract
infection.
Documentation: “To date,
the husband has refused such care as antibiotics, dental work, repairing a
broken wheelchair so she could go outdoors and the delivery of flowers to her
room.”
(Not Dead Yet: http://www.notdeadyet.org/docs/shiavoday1.html
)
“In the 1992 malpractice
trial, Schiavo argued he needed the money for long-term care for his wife,
based on a life expectancy of another 50 years. But seven months after
receiving the cash, the Schindlers argue, he began to withhold care and
therapy, first ordering nurses to not give Terri antibiotics for a urinary
tract infection, which could have resulted in her death.”
(World Net Daily:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43026
)
We all know that Greer
and other judges denied oral food, but here is a quote: “Five months
following their banishment from the Hospice, Bobby and Suzanne Schindler had
their visiting rights restored, but only on condition that they not attempt
any spoon-feeding.
"I don't want anyone
trying to feed that girl," Greer thundered.”
(Source: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35077
)
While Theresa could have
died from basic infections, like third world country citizens -and while this
young woman of about forty lost five or more teeth due to care (or lack), all
under the care of a court while allowed mistreatment, we wonder was this
legal?
It is a matter of public
record that Terri was denied not only the feeding tube, but also oral food and
water; It is also a matter of public record that Terri could eat Jell-O, and
that it is believed that she can swallow her own
saliva.
The judge prohibited not
only therapy and rehab -but also examination by doctors. I wonder what he was
hiding. However, let me not get off-topic and
side-tracked:
The 2004
ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND
EXPLOITATION OF ELDERLY PERSONS AND DISABLED ADULTS §825.102,Fla.Stats.,
Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult;
penalties.-- (3)(a) "Neglect of an elderly person or
disabled adult" means: 1. A caregiver's failure or omission to provide an elderly person
or disabled adult with the care, supervision, and services necessary to
maintain the elderly person's or disabled adult's physical and mental health,
including, but not limited to, FOOD,
nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, MEDICINE, and medical
services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of
the elderly person or disabled adult…(b)
A person who willfully or by culpable negligence neglects an elderly
person or disabled adult and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent
disability, or permanent disfigurement to the elderly person or disabled adult
commits a felony of the second degree… (c) A person who willfully or by culpable
negligence neglects an elderly person or disabled adult without causing
great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the
elderly person or disabled adult commits a felony of the third
degree…
Representative Stargel,
many people have said that Terri can’t eat or drink, and that it would be OK
to deny her oral food and water; however, their logic would be flawed for two
reasons:
1) Terri, as many
witnesses and medical experts have testified, can indeed eat and drink to some
limited degree; and,
2) Even were she to not
be able to eat, it would be a felony violation of this chapter to not at least
try: Her life is on the line.
Dehydration would occur
before starvation, and as Kate Adamson and Rev. Rus Cooper-Dowda
have testified, very, very painful!
These violations of law
normally land the abuser in prison, whether the victim is a cat, a criminal on
death row, or a handicapped or elderly citizen.
However, these judges
seem to think they are above the law; this felony crime of neglect on the part
of the judges involved would alone be reason to impeach. Since it is apparent
that the judges involved have played some part in intimidating local law
enforcement agencies to not take reports on this case or consider the bone
scan records which were initially hidden (illegal refusal of “discovery” of
evidence), then this smacks of conspiracy, however, I would not be so ready to
accuse all the judges of influencing the local police agencies, yet, some
influence is obvious. Can the FDLE (Florida Department of Law Enforcement) not
outright arrest said judges on charges of chapter 876
conspiracies?
Why would the judges
involved be in a rush to illegally deny medical services and oral food and
water to Theresa, deny her speech therapy to suppress her possible testimony
of alleged spousal abuse, and then make a rush to cremate her and preclude and
avoid an autopsy? Was this not to hide evidence of wrongdoing and cover
incompetence or a possible conspiracy to perform illegal acts? Why does the
judge continue to allow Mike Schiavo to be in contempt of court and at the
same time attempt to stop a lawful and legal investigation by the Department
of Children and Families (DCF)?
Do the recent recoveries
of people once thought to be “PVS” not give rise to thought that maybe we
could be wrong to quickly declare a person “hopeless?” E.g., Sarah
Scantlin, a
( http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0035531.cfm
, Brain Damaged Woman Speaks after 20 Years, by Stuart Shepard,
correspondent)
In light of the legal
definitions of “PVS,” which the courts clearly violated in making their unjust
judgments (Terri obviously has “some” cognitive behavior, obvious to a
schoolchild), what is the mindset of the judges? To uphold -or to violate -the
law?
§765.101(12),Fla.Stats.,
"Persistent vegetative state" means a permanent and irreversible condition of
unconsciousness in which there is:
(a) The absence of
voluntary action or cognitive behavior of ANY kind. [Emphasis supplied.] I.e.,
The judges have purposely violated this law by not applying its plain language
to the cases.
Summarizing:
1) Oath of office and
qualifying statement for running in a race per elections
laws.
2) Possible conflicts of
interests and/or ex parte statements to participants and/or press regarding a
case under review.
3) Illegal placement -and
retention -in hospice.
4) Denial of counsel in
court and willful and purposeful illegal acting as guardian -deprivation of
representation of handicapped ward.
5) Collusion and
conspiracy to perform same with an “organization” of judges, who stick
together to defeat the rule of law and form of government as we know
it.
6) Felony financial fraud
-conspiracy to aid and abet.
7) Felony abuse, neglect,
and exploitation of elderly, vulnerable, and/or
disabled.
It is my estimation
that any one of these violations -if
found to be true (with the possible exception of number two above) would -all
by itself -be justification to impeach. It is also my estimation that
many judges have violated many laws in my 7 points of summary
above.
It is also my studied and
reasoned judgment, based on professional experience and the maturity that
comes from education in several disciplines, that there is undisputed evidence
to substantiate the allegations made in items 3-7, any one of which, if true,
would justify impeachment of a number of judges who, effectively, conspired to
undermine our form of government, in which the people, through our elected
representatives, write law, with a system of checks and balances. The result
will be that you could be slammed into hospice, whether terminal or not, and
denied basic medical care, such as antibiotics, or even oral food –not to be
confused with a feeding tube:
“Marjorie Nighbert signed
an “advance directive” before she was hospitalized for a stroke in 1996. This
document stated that she desired no “heroic measures.” Based on this, her
family requested that her feeding tube be removed. When Ms. Nighbert begged
for food, the courts deemed her 'not medically competent to ask for such a
treatment,' and the hospital physically restrained her in bed so that she
could not pilfer food from other patients. She died ten days later.” {Note:
This citation from the Catholic Culture website was verified as correct from
numerous independent sources, not the least of which is Focus on the Family.}
Source: http://www.CatholicCulture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=5524
That is, it is my
estimation that a number of judges have conspired to break the law and should,
as an obligation to our state and federal constitutions, be impeached,
pursuant to Article III, Section 17 of the State Constitution. (It’s within
your reach: You must impeach.) Am I right in my claims that
activist judges exist who do not follow the law? We all want a fair day in
court; if we don’t learn from history, then history will repeat itself. Thank
you for your speedy answer. Are my estimations above
correct?
With kind regards, I am sincerely,
__________________
Gordon Wayne Watts
(863) 688-9880 / (863) 686-3411 / (863)
686-3411