On July 8, as the 14th International AIDS
Conference was just getting underway in Barcelona, Spain, TV,
radio, the Internet and the newspapers were filled with the
latest stories about this worldwide epidemic. Despite decades of
efforts to educate and inform the population while attempting to
prevent and eradicate the disease, it continues to spread
unabated.
The New York Times reported on its front page
that "the vast majority of young gay and bisexual men in
the United States who were found to have the AIDS virus in a new
study were unaware of their infection."
The article went on to say that most of the
infected men thought they were at low risk of contracting HIV
"despite having engaged in frequent, high-risk
sex."
An article the same day in The Wall Street
Journal dealt with a new AIDS drug called T-20. Developed by
Roche Holding, AG and Trimeris, Inc., it is the first of a new
class of AIDS drugs called fusion inhibitors, which may be
"able to suppress even super strains of HIV." But the
article also cautioned that the drug "may prove
unaffordable."
Reuters news service reported from the
conference that a vaccine could be available for HIV within a
decade. The article stated, "Dr. Seth Berkley, founder and
president of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI),
said an effective vaccine is the only way to end the pandemic,
which threatens to kill more than 68 million people between 2000
and 2020."
Try as I might, I couldn't find any mention
of the words 'immorality' or 'promiscuity' as a cause for the
rampant spread of HIV in any of the stories I perused on the
Internet or in the three major newspapers I read every day.
An editorial in the New York Times, while
clamoring for "strong political leadership" as
"the most important factor in preventing the spread of
AIDS," decried the shortage of condoms in the countries
where the disease is most prevalent. The closest the editors
came to broaching the subject of personal responsibility was to
state, "People do not easily change behavior, especially
when it requires them to confront the possibility of death and
negotiate new patterns of sexual relations."
I assume the editors at the New York Times
were equating the practice of safe sex to "negotiating new
patterns of sexual relations." It's doubtful they'd
advocate abstinence.
Yet in the case of HIV, which is largely
transmitted sexually, abstinence works one hundred percent of
the time in preventing its transmission when sex is the vector.
Advocating abstinence is anathema to most
members of the mainstream media, who seem to have a deep
aversion to anything that involves moralizing about human
sexuality. It smacks too much of Nancy Reagan's "Just Say
No" campaign to prevent illicit drug use among teenagers.
It was a simple, common sense approach that worked, by the way.
At the end of the day, if you dug deep enough
through the pile of stories that detailed the human suffering
and the bleak prognosis for an end to the worldwide AIDS crisis,
there was one lone voice of reason.
The Associated Press reported that Pope John
Paul appealed to the world's young people to follow a path of
chastity. In his weekly address to the people in St. Peter's
Square he cautioned against following the impulses of pleasure.
Citing the story of Saint Maria Goretti, a young girl who was
murdered by an older man after she rebuffed his sexual advances,
the Pope said her story was a reflection of "the importance
of values that should not be compromised."
But it was the apostle Paul who was most
direct.
Writing to the church in Corinth over 2,000
years ago he warned simply, "Flee sexual immorality."
In three words much like "Just Say
No," he offered a clarion call of human reason. His was a
simple, common sense approach, the equivalent of a safe,
effective and inexpensive vaccine to prevent the spread of HIV
in cases resulting from promiscuous behavior.
This is precisely what world leaders need to
emphasize if the HIV pandemic is ever to be stopped in its
tracks. Obviously, their current approach continues to fail
miserably.