Articles about libraries
and librarianship
Classification
Compromises

Maximizing the area did necessarily require making compromises. Firstly, it was decided that books were to be shelved according to height. This change was not as great as one might think.

In most modern collections, including this one, books are really shelved by computer, rather than by visual contiguity. This is in itself a form of arbitrary shelving, since it does not allow for the physical size of the books. It’s a necessary tradeoff, because of the gain, but if it is a tradeoff nonetheless. The concept of browsing has changed from scanning the physical books on shelves to scanning a computer-based classified listing. The traditional shelflist is thus relegated to the librarian’s workroom, to be used more as a tool for physically placing an item than for defining a relationship among similar materials.

Where do you want to go now?

Read more articles about classification

Read more articles about Jewish libraries

Go to the Jewish Home Library links page

Find out about the Jewish Home Library forum

Find out about other websites by David Grossman


Are you required to read this webpage for a course? Do NOT print out the article. It is copyrighted.
Your exercise for this article is as follows:

Click here for subject and title lists of articles by David Grossman

Copyright © David Grossman. World rights reserved. This article may not be printed, forwarded, reproduced, or copied in any way or in any medium without written permission from David Grossman.

/GrossmanLib/Classif/Compromises