Back to the Venomous
Butterfly page
Many are the things that
cannot be measured
but nothing is more
immeasurable than man.
—Sophocles
The meaning of measure. It is an enclosure that is a dispute with and
management of life at the same time, a prison that poses the existence of
people equal to zero.
And yet, as Protagoras said, the human being is the measure of all
things. His intelligence is the place in which they are linked together. If the
human being herself is this measure, this threshold, it means that he has no
place and that her home is atopia.
A measure to impose, and the punishment for those who arrogantly go
beyond it, only has meaning if it provides a boundary, a homeland, to human
life. And this homeland is nothing more than the designation of a space built
around the limits in which one tries to constrain that which is particularly
unlimited, singularity.
But it is really the place of the limit to create trans-gression, and to
justify itself as limit through punishment.
Errare divinum est (To err is divine), said Savinio. Only when we pose
the measure of individuals as something that transcends them do crime and
punishment have a foundation. “To err” pertains to the gods. If their empire,
their measure, falls, the limits created in their image and likeness fall as
well. The human being cannot help but go beyond the limits, since he himself is
the limit, the boundless threshold. Furthermore, only in this hubris, in this
arrogance, is her possibility for affirming herself as individual to be found.
As Holderlin understood with regards to Sophocles’ Oedipus, the human
being questions and lives “immeasurably”. Relegating his individuality to the
place of law, aberrations will always occur, because ab-errare [“in wandering” and
“in error”—editor] is where one’s individuality has its place. To the extent
that the individual is her own measure, she succeeds in not sacrificing her atopia,
in being rooted in the absence of place.
This absence of place is an utter absurdity for philosophy. And this is
why its words have always advised moderation, the truth that stands in the
middle. But that middle makes the human being into a puppet of god (and of
every authority), a result of hubris and power, a mistake that poses a remedy.
The measure is god’s, the state’s, society’s. All attempts to harmonize,
to tolerate difference refer to a limit that is always collective. Whether this
boundary is the one and indisputable truth or the multiplicity of truths is of
little importance. If the truths are constrained to compose a social ensemble
of which they end up being a part, there is no space for singularity, but only
for different appraisals with respect to the techniques with which to preserve
these walls which one could not want to destroy. Each in her own way can only
be a slave. The ensemble of society—the meaning of measure—is that which one
need not take into account, “except as the object of destruction.”
The uniqueness of each of us cannot be an element of something else
because difference is itself the common space. The only place for difference is
the absence of place. Individuality must defend its difference and want the
difference of others to exist as well. My difference is revealed because that
of others exists.
Power, on the contrary, is the foundation of a territory of identity and
measurement, a territory from which it is impossible to escape without
destroying the community of those who have been made equal to zero (that
Michelstaedter called the “wicked clique”) and building the common difference.
I think that affirming one’s singularity is the exact opposite of the
defensive armoring of oneself, that prison-like enclosure from which (as the
skeptical “reaction” to the religion of the common good and sacrifice would have
it) to control the world with the disenchantment of doubt. Difference is not a
slit through which to spy on the movements of the other, afraid that she might
go too far in making his way and thus could disturb our tranquility. There
isn’t any kitchen garden to cultivate as Voltaire believed. Distrust, the fear
of the other that makes us move away suddenly when we touch a strange body, is
an ivory tower under siege. The immeasurable dimension in which it is possible
to live together without domination and abuse, and so also without their
double, Harmony, can “settle” in no one place.
Singularity has no homeland because the homeland is power.
The individual in revolt is a “restless place between the night and the
light”, between destruction and creation. And more. The light itself is
darkness, since Phanes “sits inside, in the sanctuary of the night.” But not
even the liquidation of the dialectic that always transforms the negative into
the positive, annihilating it, is capable of becoming a certainty. If we were
to look for the measure, the one of being against or outside, in the sanctuary
of the night, we would end up becoming evangelists of demolition, pensioners of
revolt.
In its endless skirmishes, the Logic seems unshakable. And yet its rigid
form cannot resist anyone who wants to live without measure.
Once again, more than a project, it is a question of knowing how to
live.
—Massimo Passamani