September 17, 2001
By WILLIAM SAFIRE
WASHINGTON -- One Sunday morning a generation ago, the
C.I.A. chief William Casey dropped in at my house for a cup of coffee and
gruffed, "You got a map of Afghanistan?"
Not your usual request, but I found a world atlas.
Casey's fingers stabbed at the map to show the strategic purpose of the Soviet
Army's thrust southward into that nation. First, conquer Afghanistan; then take
over neighboring Pakistan, thereby achieving the czarist dream of an opening to
the Indian Ocean, leading to Communist victory in the cold war.
To counter Moscow's daring plan, we covertly supported
the Afghans with guerrilla training and anti-aircraft weapons. Sure enough,
with our secret aid and with the help of adventurous Muslim volunteers from all
over - including one rich young Saudi named Osama bin Laden - the Afghans
stunned the world by breaking the will of the Red Army. Our spymaster was
prescient: that demoralizing, decade-long military defeat did begin the end of Communism's evil empire.
But the soldiers of misfortune triumphant in that war
found further sponsorship from ayatollahs who took over Iran as well as
dictators of Iraq, Libya and Syria. That gave impetus to a loosely linked,
resentment-motivated terrorist empire usually lumped together as "radical
Islam."
After the murder of thousands of American civilians by
19 suicide bombers, almost every Arab or Persian man in the U.S. has been
receiving looks of fear or suspicion. Our leaders, recalling the unjust roundup
of patriotic Japanese-Americans in World War II, rightly condemned such
knee-jerk bigotry.
It was fitting that a Muslim cleric was among those
chosen to offer their condolence at the National Cathedral memorial service.
Other Muslim clergy have dissociated their religion from radical violence, and
Arab- American groups have taken out ads expressing their revulsion at the
crime and solidarity with the grief- stricken. But Muslims are uniquely
equipped to undertake more specific action.
What are the two most powerful weapons the terrorists
possess? First, the element of surprise, which we will try to reduce with
closer surveillance, air marshals, biological and missile defenses, etc. A more
powerful weapon of radical Islam is its ability to erase from the brains of
recruits the basic will to live. The normal survival instinct is replaced with
a pseudo-religious fantasy of a killer's self-martyrdom leading to eternity in
paradise surrounded by adoring virgins. This perversion of one of the world's great
faiths produces suicide bombers.
How to build a defense against the theological
brainwashing that creates these human missiles? That is the challenge to Muslim
clerics everywhere, not to mention Arab governments fearful of radical
takeover. In recent months, official Palestinian stations have been
broadcasting sly evocations of suicidal martyrdom, and over the weekend, in a
mosque in Peshawar, Pakistan, a radical cleric hailed America's black September
as a victory for Islam.
Mainstream Muslim clergy need to step up in their
mosques and in public – as many surely are now doing - to give the lie to the
fanatics' perversion of their faith. It is for them, far more effectively than
for members of other religions, to cite teachings from the Koran that forbid
the murder of innocents and to warn that such murderers will suffer for their
sins.
For many vulnerable clerics, a reminder of Allah's
wrath would require great courage. But every religion has its local
communications networks. Such specific refutation, repeated with fervor and
broadcast in every language throughout the world, would begin to plant the
seeds of doubt in the misled minds of the suicidal. The potential of eternal
punishment rather than bliss would encourage at least some life-saving defections
from the ranks of radicals seeking to take over Islam and destroy all other
religions.
Political leaders are weighing the wisdom of invading
Afghanistan or plastering other havens of terrorist cells. It may be that a
not-so-holy alliance of democracies determined to end this scourge and
autocracies afraid of internal terrorist takeover will unite in uncomfortable
military collaboration and rampant realpolitik.
But if, at the same time, the great majority of
peaceful Muslims can be helped to win their internal theological war, today's
military solutions need not beget tomorrow's tragedies.