![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Existentialism | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Existentialism is a movement or a philosophy that is very much concerned with death. I believe there is a distinction between the modern existentialists and Sartre. However, I am not an expert on either matter. Sartre and the other existentialists wrote books trying to communicate their positions to their readers. The modern existentialists recognize the existence of incommunicable knowledge. Most notable is the knowledge of one's own mortality when one comes to terms with one's own death. There is a "hole in the soul" that cannot be denied. The chilling truth that someday one must die blows through one's entire being like an icy black wind. I have read a little of Sartre, but not an extensive amount, and what I have read makes no mention of incommunicability except one vague unexplained reference to the incommunicability of monads. I have no idea what he meant by that. My point is that incommunicability is huge. It destroys the philosophical endeavor. Back in my college days, I had a philosophy professor who was describing a fight he had with one of his former girlfriends. They were arguing about the relationship of Logic and the World. He said it was something like this: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Live Socrates and the Eternal Search for Truth. Death to Relativism in all its hideous guises. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Check out our message board. Make sure you register if you wish to post. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
She said it was something like this: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Considering that there are incommunicable moments that logic cannot capture (and imaginary objects like pink unicorns which it can), the truth of the matter is actually: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tell me what you think: Email Me: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
My understanding has always been that the philosophic endeavor rests on the assumption that logic can describe everything in the world. If this is false, then the philosophic endeavor is doomed to failure. I learned from an existentialist friend of mine, that this was indeed the case in my fourth year of college studying philosophy. Needless to say, I did not feel compelled to go on and continue studying philosophy at the graduate level. There are several implications of all this for moral theory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |