This is a
page from the official, non-commercial, and nonprofit web site of “Mark Andrew Dwyer” whose only
goal is educating and informing.
Although
all material contained on this page is copyrighted either by “Mark Andrew Dwyer” or by other
parties (all pictures are from the Internet and are copyrighted by third
parties), it is being offered here
solely as an educational tool to increase understanding of global economics
and social justice issues for 'fair use' of
copyrighted material as provided in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Please, send
your comments to readerswrite@yahoo.com.
(See also readers’ comments after the article.)
By “Mark Andrew Dwyer”
January 2, 2007
The following
was my first commentary posted at American Patrol circa 1999 (the link expired;
the picture is from ref [3]):
There is a
striking similarity between how recent flood of illegal aliens from
Common cuckoos
are famous for duping other birds into raising their chicks. A mother cuckoo, rather
than building a nest while pregnant, will find one that has already eggs in it,
and when its owners are away, will lay there one of her own. Cuckoo eggs hatch
quickly, usually before their hosts' eggs, and they grow fast after they hatch.
When the cuckoo chick is strong enough, it will kick out one-by-one all its
foster siblings (whether hatched or not) from the nest, and consume all the
food that its foster parents can deliver. The hungry cuckoo chick makes so much
noise (a very fast "si-si-si-si") that the parents will devote all
their time to diligently feed the chick that grows into a grotesque behemoth
four times the size of their own.
Now,
So, next time
when somebody tells you that we, Americans, must pick up the tab for education
and care of illegal aliens, and set aside a room for them in our more and more
overcrowded, traffic-jammed, and polluted country so that they, too, can pursue
the American dream, remember the cuckoo chicks.
Over the last
seven years after the article’s publication, I heard many nonsensical claims,
the absurdity of which can be clearly seen after their translation on the cuckoo chicks language.
Here are some
of them.
These where
the European nations that were the actual cuckoos that laid their eggs in
indigenous (which all-inclusive term refers to, depending on the context, North
American Indians or Mexican Aztecs) peoples’ nest (the U.S.) and the pilgrims and the
settlers were the actual cuckoo chicks that kicked out the
“indigenous” chicks.
Well, when the
cuckoo dies, her chicks will prosper anyway since they only depend of the
hosting birds. Quite obviously, should the
Moreover, the
pilgrims did not kick the natives out, but traded with them, and offered them
several benefits for the land that the natives thought belonged to nobody. They
(the pilgrims, the immigrants, and their descendents) were the ones who built
the actual nest (the
As to the Mexican Aztecs and their descendents, their
ancestors lived nowhere even close to where the today’s
The cuckoo (
In addition to the fallacy mentioned above (Mexican Aztecs
have no ethnicity-based claim to the U.S. land), this argument has a striking
similarity to claims made by Hitler who insisted that certain Eastern European
lands (for instance, western parts of Poland and Czechoslovakia) belonged to
German nation solely on basis of ethnicity.
The cuckoos and their chicks contribute to host birds’
economy by creating the demand for more nests and food.
Whatever their contributions are, they consume more than
they contribute.
If there are any negative effects of cuckooism then they
should be blamed on hosting birds that didn’t build nests that are big
enough to accommodate both the cuckoo chick and their own. If some of hosting
birds’ chicks suffer or die, it’s because they waste their food.
The above seem to be the core argument of “blame
America first” demagogues who root Third World’s overpopulation,
poverty, and economic failures on not enough American generosity, charity, and
compassion, as wall as on Americans wasting their resources.
All the birds of the world should feed all the chicks of the
world, including the cuckoo chicks, even if the cuckoos are unwilling to do so.
This is a typical liberal/leftist/communist/neo-socialist
plea that pretends to remedy a serious problem with a (usually unsatisfiable)
promise of utopia.
Any restrictions on where cuckoos may and may not lay their
eggs would violate their God-given rights and principles of free enterprise
that would, eventually, discourage all birds form building nests.
That is very much the free
trade/free movement of labor argument. Its absurdity is visible with a
naked eye.
It doesn’t really matter whose chicks, the
cuckoo’s or their own, the host birds are feeding. All that matters is
that the well-being and survival of the entire birdship (birdity?) is secured
this way.
This is the argument usually brought up by the advocates of
the so-called “proposition nation”, a doctrine that claims that it
doesn’t matter who the American people are as long as they are human
beings that support the American constitution and form of government. Well, if
at certain moment big spotted cuckoos become 100% successful in replacing the
host birds’ offspring, they will die out to extinction as there will be
no one left to feed their chicks anymore. Also, hosting birds’ altruistic
continuation of the feeding of the cuckoo chick after it has terminated its
foster siblings is, to it’s all apparent “humanitarianism”, a
maladaptive strategy as it increases the chances that another cuckoo, perhaps
the one that they are feeding now, will dupe them, again, and further decrease
chances for their own reproductive success.
All birds’ chicks, including cuckoo chicks, have equal
rights to be hatched and fed. Calls to stop birds from laying eggs into some
other bird’s nests are de facto directed only against cuckoos (or will have a disparate effect on
cuckoos), and, therefore, are rascist (speciest?) by their very nature. They
should be banned, or, at least, silenced as a form of hate speech against
birds’ minority (cuckoos). The host birds that refuse to feed cuckoo
chicks (like Australian superb fairy-wren, see ref. [2]) exhibit
blatant racism (speciesm?), nativism, and xenophobia, and should be severely
punished for their malice and refusal.
Should I add
anything more? Remember the cuckoo chicks!
Readers’ comments: “What a great analogy Mark, you had me
in stitches, I forgot about Cuckoo Birds.....”
“Cuckoo Chicks
-- The Best Analogy I've Ever Read”
“Very good
read!”
“I wasn't aware
of your excellent '99 Cuckoo Chicks piece. Excellent!! Thanks for sharing it
again with us!”
“This by far is
the best illustration that brings the point home than any I have ever seen.
Would you please figure out a way to get this in The
“Mark: Absolutely brilliant, as always.”
“I absolutely loved this!!” [top]
REFERENCES
[1] “Their” Land
By Mark Andrew
Dwyer
http://oocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/Their_land.htm
[2] Cuckoos, Wrens in Escalating Evolutionary Arms Race
By James Owen
http://207.24.89.17/news/2003/03/0311_030312_cuckoo.html
[3] Common Cuckoo
From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Cuckoo
Past commentary (December 20, 2006): THE
LEFT’S ARROGANCE with
extensive footnotes and hard-to-find references.
Mark Andrew Dwyer's latest commentary (updated) is posted at:
save this link >>> http://www.oocities.org/readerswrite/commentaries/latest.htm
Links to commentaries by “Mark Andrew Dwyer” posted at AmericanPatrol.com (retrieved by Google)
Links to commentaries by “Mark Andrew Dwyer” posted at SierraTimes.com
Links to commentaries by "Mark Andrew Dwyer" posted elsewhere (retrieved by Google)
Visit americanpatrol.com for the most comprehensive and up to date coverage of immigration news and commentaries.
The
URL address of this page is: http://oocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/Cuckoo_chicks.htm.