This is a page from
the official, non-commercial, and nonprofit web site of “Mark Andrew Dwyer” whose only
goal is educating and informing.
Although all material contained or referenced on this page is
copyrighted either by “Mark
Andrew Dwyer” or by other parties (all pictures are from the
Internet and are copyrighted by third parties), it is being offered here solely as an educational tool to increase
understanding of global economics and social justice issues for 'fair use' of
copyrighted material as provided in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Please, send your
comments to readerswrite@yahoo.com.
(See also readers’ comments after the article.)
By “Mark Andrew Dwyer”
August 10, 2008
irredentist - One who advocates the recovery of territory culturally or historically related to one's nation but now subject to a foreign government. [alphaDictionary.com]
It must come as a shocking news to all those who preached: "We are one global community, now. We are all the citizens of the world. As freedom and democracy are spreading all over the globe, there will be wars no more."
Despite their dare predictions based on such absurd inventions as "diversity is strength", "nation states are anachronism in today's world", and "a key to peace and prosperity is a lack of border and immigration enforcement", a deadly war erupted, again, in relatively well civilized part of the world: Europe.
As of today, the Russian tanks are roaming in South Ossetia, a province in former Soviet Republic, now a sovereign country Georgia, in the process of what the Russian officials call a "liberation" of that region, after launching airstrikes on several Georgian cities that brought civilian deaths and destruction.
According to U.K. Daily Mail (see [1], all pictures in this commentary are from there - refer to the fair use clause above), "most of the 70,000 South Ossetians hold Russian passports and are allied to Moscow". As a part of their well-rooted separatist movement, they attempted to secede from Georgia, in order to fulfill their allegiance to Russia, declaring South Ossetia capital Tskhinvali a breakaway city. Russian government, of course, did not pass on this perfect opportunity to expand its control of the region and the pipeline that supplies 1% of world oil supply, and sent its troops in order to, ostensibly, protect Georgia's Russian minority from discrimination and other suffering that they were exposed to under the Georgia's government.
Not that a rational observer, familiar with history of the old continent, should be surprised with this "escalation of violence", as the so-called "mainstream media" prefer to refer to ethnic wars.
The First World War was sparked by ethnic tensions in Balkans. The main excuse for launching the Second World War were alleged violations of rights of German ethnic minorities in Czechoslovakia and Poland, followed by irredentist claims of these minorities on behalf of Germany. And the bloody war in former Yugoslavia (still not quite over) was caused, yes, you guessed it right, by ethnic tensions between various groups of peoples that freed themselves from the totalitarian rule of a socialist regime.
There is an important lesson that we, Americans, can learn from this tragic experience of Georgian people.
Minorities of neighbor nations, concentrated in ethnic enclaves (so-called "immigrant communities" or "Latino communities"), are like matchboxes in a barrel of powder - they are notorious of sparking explosions of irredentism and violent conflicts. The usual consequence of ethnic or national minority in one country maintaining allegiance to its neighbor country is a war. Allowing Mexican minority grow stronger and infiltrate American structures of political and military power is plain stupid if not outright suicidal.
As of today, there are
millions of Mexican nationals living in Los
Angeles and vicinity. They have their
"Little Mexico" (few miles South of
downtown L.A.), their Spanish TV, radio,
and newspapers that reinforce their
allegiance to their motherland, they
have their chauvinist and revisionist
organizations that on behalf of their
la raza
articulate irredentist claims against
the U.S., they have local and state
"Hispanic" officials that cater to their
nationalistic
interests and demands, and they,
occasionally, march on the streets of
L.A. demanding "liberation" of the
American Southwest from "occupation" by
the U.S. (see [2]). And the dual citizenship that
many Mexcian-Americans hold only makes
the problem more acute, as it increases
the number of citizens with split
loyalty who can become pivots in local
and national elections.
What we see in Georgia is a likely
future that Liberal "progressives",
neo-con compassionate globalists, and
their propaganda machine (the so-called
"mainstream" media, major newspapers,
and Hollywood moguls) are about to bring on our
heads. Tens of millions of Mexican
nationals loyal to their country of
origin (or ancestry) keep escalating
their irredentist claims, and it is only
a matter of time when Mexico will move
on to "liberate" American territories,
just like Russians are doing in Georgia.
Don't be fooled by the imbalance
of military power between the U.S. and
Mexico. There is enough individuals
profoundly loyal to Mexican nation in
American governments of all levels and
in the armed forces to derail any
serious attempts of using our military
superiority while defending our country
against Mexican invasion or secession of
states like California infested with
Mexican separatists.
When it
happens, ACLU will claim that the U.S.
Constitution unconditionally guarantees
each an every person in the U.S. (in
particular, all ACLU acivists) a
God-given right to welcome the invaders,
cheer their troopers and militants,
offer them "humanitarian " help, and
defend them in American courts against
discrimination and civil rights
violations. The U.S. Senate will wave
the white flag as quickly and
unconditionally as it did when it
attempted to surrender to millions of
marching illegals demanding amnesty and
rights to "their" share of America in
May 2006 (see [3]).
The history shows that some nations are
more expansive than others, and reveal
clear imperialist tendencies, despite
the relativist mantra "all cultures are
equal". Russia, know as the Soviet Union
between 1917 and 1991, is one of such
nations with deeply rooted culture of
expansion and imperialism. Mexico, a
successor of Spanish Empire, built on
remainders of Aztec Empire, is another;
it shows its true colors once in a
while, mostly in Freudian slips of its
leaders and officials (like "I am proud
to announce that Mexican nation expands
beyond the territory enclosed by its
borders", or "Where is a Mexican there
is Mexico", just to name a few).
The
pattern of expansion that they have followed
for some 500 years now belongs to the
same category as Hitler's national
socialism (a relatively new phenomenon) that used the alleged
"discrimination" against German ethnic
minorities Czechoslovakia and Poland as
an excuse to armed invasion of these
countries. Contrast this with the U.S.,
a country that was NOT built on conquest
and deception (see [4]) but on peaceful
settlements and tedious development of
once wild and mostly uninhabited land, despite false accusations
by notorious irredentists, revisionists,
and expansionists that want everything
for their la raza and nothing for
everybody else.
There is no comparison between the U.S.
and Spanish Empire or its posthumous
offspring, Mexico, in
spite of constant whining of Mexican
socialists and would-be revolutionaries
that throw all whites into one category
of conquistadors and oppressors. And
the only way to maintain in North
America our most
sublimed, liberated, and humane form of
Western civilization is
to stop Mexican expansion, be it
"migration" or demographic changes, once
and for all.
We have to do it before it's too late,
or we will share the tragic fate of the
people of Georgia.
Readers’ comments: Be the
first to voice your opinion here.
Send your comments to: readerswrite@yahoo.com. [top]
REFERENCES
[1] The Pipeline War: Russian bear goes for West's jugular
[2] Liberation and Socialism, or the Marching Morons?
http://oocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/Liberation.htm
[3] Anatomy of Treason
http://oocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/Anatomy_of_treason.htm
[4] "Their" land
http://www.oocities.org/readerswrite/commentaries/Their_land.htm
FURTHER READING
Differences Between Races a Distraction
http://oocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/Differences_between_races.htm
Argues that, despite common misconception, American public disapproval of amnesty for millions of illegal aliens has not been caused by racial differences between these Americans and the majority of illegal aliens but by the fact that the majority of illegals, banded together by their common ancestry and genetic kinship, have been displacing the Americans in their own country. Indicates absurdity of anti-enforcement lobby’s various dogmas and claims regarding the role of race and ethnicity in politics of mass immigration, and debunks myths about the relations between white Americans and other racial and ethnic groups in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Mark Andrew Dwyer's latest commentary (updated) is posted at:
save this link >>> http://www.oocities.org/readerswrite/commentaries/latest.htm
Links to commentaries by “Mark Andrew Dwyer” posted at AmericanPatrol.com (retrieved by Google)
Links to commentaries by “Mark Andrew Dwyer” posted at FederalObserver.com
Links to commentaries by “Mark Andrew Dwyer” posted at TheConservativeVoice.com
Links to commentaries by "Mark Andrew Dwyer" posted elsewhere (retrieved by Google)
Visit americanpatrol.com for the most comprehensive and up to date coverage of immigration news and commentaries.
The
URL address of this page is:
http://oocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/http://www.oocities.org/readerswrite/commentaries/Future_of_multi-culti.htm.