JAPANESE HISTORY
Tokugawa Japan 1600-1878
1
Control system
2
Collapse of Tokugawa Shogunate
3
Downfall of Tokugawa Shogunate
4
Note
Meiji Japan 1878-1912
1
Introduction
2
Charter Oath
3
Abolition of feudalism
> 4 Political Modernization
5
Economic Modernization
6
Military Modernization
7
Education Modernization
8
Note - Rise of militarism
All rights reserved - 2003- By C.F.Cheng
Political Modernization
- to monopolise pol power in the hands of the oligarchs
- to show to the west that Japan would adopt western
political system
- form but not the content in reality
- not true western democracy
- strong & advanced countries, like Britain, France, US,
based their national strength on representative
institution & machines
- the unity among diff samurai leaders from a few feudal
clans in late Tokugawa period that succeeded in bring the
restoration in 1868 was broken in 1873
- Toza, Hizen had contribution in Meiji Restoration, but no
share of political power
- 1880's, People's Right's Movement
- to pacify the discontent of the movement leader
- to end the movement
- to gain mass support
- rise of political Parties
- men of all classes developed an interest in politics
- newspaper
- discontent of samurai
- common people were educated & political conscious
- influenced by new ideas from the western (eg democracy)
- Great demand for participation in government from the
samurai & political parties
- 1870s, Tosa leaders founded political clubs ¡V wanted to
control of the emperor's advisers
- 1878, People's Right's Movt
- Constitutional Movement
- political clubs set up all over Japan
- ask for establishing a national assembly
- Conscription Law ¡V people expected that the govt should
repay them by giving more political rights
- 1875, new laws prohibited press criticism of the
government
- 1880, Public Assembly Law limited public gatherings
Preparation for the parliamentary / representative
government system
- 1881, emperor announced that a constitution would be
adopted , &
a diet would be opened by 1890
- 1882, Ito Hirobumi's mission to Europe to study western
constitutions
- Prussian model on Constitutional Monarchy
- Authoritarianism
- The power was controlled by emperor
- Ito carried out several reforms after his return to
strengthen the power of the government
1889 Meiji Constitution
- a gift from emperor
- an instrument for establishing a strong centralized
government
- gave people the opportunity to participate in a limited
way in the administration of the affairs of the state
- centralization of political power in the hand of emperor
- decided to establish the supremacy of emperor
- enable the state to control the people
- freedom was less important than obedience
- society is more important than individual
- emperor ¡V still a figurehead
- the source of all power
- supreme, scared & inviolable
- above the constitution
- uncontrolled by the Diet
- commander of Army & Navy
- could declare war, make peace & conclude treaties
- could appoint & remove all ministers & judges
- could veto any law
- could dissolve the Diet
- could issue imperial decrees or ordinances
- controlled foreign policy
- financially independent of the diet
- real power was exercised by his agents
- restoration leaders ¡V samurai from Choshu &
Satsuma, Oligarchs, genro
- the Oligarchs monopolized the political power
- dominance of militarists in government
- a compromise between statism, militarists, Confucianists,
liberalism
- Enough concessions were given to the liberals to satisfy
their min. demands
- Confucianists' hope for a more conservative policy
- Enough powers had been reserved for the government
- Yamagata's demand for an autonomy under the emperor of
the armed services
- no real sincerity to give true western-style democracy
- complete / total democracy might cause troubles
- A major innovation in Ja's political history
- Forming the basis of modern rule by law
- Government should be conducted according to the
constitution
¡@
1. Cabinet ¡V ministers were responsible to the emperor
2. Diet - House of Peers (nobles)
- House of Representative
- members were elected by limited suffrage ¡V 1% of
the population
- only had budgetary power
- if the diet failed to pass a new budget, goverment
could carried out the budget of the previous year
- too limited in power
- little control over the Cabinet & Privy Council
3. Privy council ¡V policy making group centered round the
emperor
¡V policy making & administration were without serious
check by the people
4. Genro - extra-constitutional body
- control the govt politically
- dominated the constitution
5. Army & Navy ¡V could direct access to emperor
- People was given freedom of speech, press, association,
but was subjected to the limits of law
- Right to vote for members of the House of Representatives
- Had to pay tax & serve in armed force
¡@
Special feature of the constitution
- Strengthened emperor's power
- Power, central position of the emperor were all
guaranteed
- The constitution provided that the emperor exercised the
rights of sovereignty & legislative power
- Amendments decided by emperor with the advice of the
Privy Council were final
- Executive branch was more powerful than the legislative
- No concept of collective responsibility
- Ministers were appointed by emperor & acted for him
- Special rights of the old leaders
- Emperor did not take part in the administration
- Genro - the only body able to make final decisions
dominated army & navy
- monopolized the office of prime minister & Privy
Council
- Make the House of Peers the stabilizing force within the
legislative branch by giving it powers equal to the House
of Representatives
- Diet's power was limited
- Prime Minister who ignored the wishes of the Diet was
able to act independently because of the limited
budgetary powers of the Diet
- Dominant position of the military
- Militarists were given special privileges &
advantages
- Right to go directly to emperor for approval for their
plans
- Undemocratic constitution
- Rapid growth of opposition parties in the Diet
¡@
1st stage (1890-1894)
- Oligarch controlled the cabinet while the parties
controlled the House of Representative
- Struggle between the cabinet (oligarchy) & the
parties
- Parties tried to increase power
- members of House of Representative abused the power by
not passing the annual budget
- every attempt to increase the budget was met with
opposition from the parties
- to bargain with government
- government ¡V lack of capital to develop modernization
programme if govt adopted the budget of the previous year
- representatives of Tosa & Hizen demanded the Cabinet
should be responsible to the Diet
- budgetary power ¡V only constitutional weapon ¡V window
dressing
- House of Representative was dissolved 3 times in 4 years
- violence, assassination, bribery, threat against Diet
members were found in dealing with the members of House
of Representative in early 1890s
- prefectural governors & local police interfered in
election
- political instability
- solution: a foreign war, stress on the worship of emperor
- Sion-Japanese War ¡V a solution to have unity &
solidarity
- During the war, total support was gained
- Quick change from pol unrest to national unity
- Japan's 1st overseas invasion
- Victory
- Government & opposition leaders of pol parties in
House of Representative learned that compromise were
needed
- More unified, nationalism was spread
2nd stage (1895-1900)
- entente between oligarchs & political parties /
oligarch-party entente
- party leaders realized that they could not win the
struggle
- willing to seek compromise with the oligarchs
- government began to ally with one party
- both sides had their own consideration ¡V refused to
surrendered their interests / opposing views
- oligarchs: strengthened & consolidated their own
political powers
- parties gave support to govt policies in return for posts
in Cabinet, appointment of party members to office &
donations to party
- did not bring political stability
- corruption
- factionalism
- destroyed all hopes for an united front against oligarchs
- a turning point ¡V Imperial decree 1900
- no cabinet could be formed if the Office of Army or Navy
did not supply generals or admirals from active list to
fill the posts of Ministers of War / Navy
- if the military leaders opposed the policies of the Prime
Minister or cabinet, Minister of Army or Navy could
threaten to resign & cause the downfall of the whole
cabinet
- domination of the militarist in the government
3rd stage (1900-13)
- oligarch as party leader
- the protege of the oligarchs formed their own political
parties
- political structure ¡V more stabilized
- oligarchy was enlarged by the incorporation of the
parties
- in attempt to win support of the House of Representative
for its policies, government appointed more party members
to cabinet posts
- a violation of the original aim of keeping the cabinet
free of interference from the Diet
- the influence of Ito & Yamagata continued in Meiji
government
- but, policies were carried out by their protege Saionyi
& Katsura (they became Prime Minister alternatively
from 1900-13)
- many genro had died / retired
- Diet & cabinet co-operated more directly
- Political parties played larger roles
- Party pressure became important (esp at the late Meiji
period)
- party govt had become the form of government in Japan ¡V trend built
up in 1900s
- cabinet & parties failed to deal with the militarists
1890-1894 - conflict
1895-1900 - entente
1900-1913 - party politic
- authoritarian, but with democratic
- promotion of Shintoism worship of the Emperor
- limited democracy was a wise measure
- mentality of the people was not ready for democracy
- literacy rate was low
- democracy had no root in Japanese tradition
- few understood the principles of democracy
- the need for national unity to defend against western
imperialism
- political parties of the 1880s had no intention of giving
more power & rights to the people
- party leaders were either former samurai or merchant-industrialists
who were anxious to share power with the government, not
to transfer to the people
- government determined to hold its political power
- after 1912, rise of militarism
- military decision affected the national politics