|
|||
Instructor's Note: Here's a paper from the summer session (3 page minimum). In the limited space, the student did a good job analyzing a number of documents from Ancient Rome. Note how she discusses not only the substance of each document, but also the tenor. Sometimes by reading between the lines, you can draw reasonable inferences from the primary sources that assist in answering the underlying questions. |
|||
Student
Name
|
|||
First Written Assignment: Education in Ancient Rome |
|||
Upon reading
the primary sources Letter Home of a
“University” Student, On
Roman Educational Practices, The
Ideal Education, The Training of
Children, and On the Tranquility
of the Mind, one can see that the education that existed in Ancient
Rome was very important and valuable to the Roman people. Reading,
studying, quick learning and eloquent speech were all elements that were
expected to be a part of the Roman’s educational lives. In Letter
Home of a “University” Student, the language that was used
throughout the latter was quite notable. The language was presented in a
mature manner, considering that it was written by a young man. When the
young man used phrases such as “exceedingly glad” and unhesitatingly
accepted” (both found in paragraph 1) and words such as “abhor,”
“bailiff” and “distinguished,” (found in paragraphs 2 and 3) he
exhibited the respectable quality of the education provided for him. Also,
the context in which these words and phrases were used demonstrated the
high quality of the educational system that the young people would go
through. The language used in this letter is evidence that the education
provided for the youth of Rome was fairly advanced and complex for that
time. Letter Home of
a “University” Student also provided information about the extreme respect that the pupils had
for their educators. The young man who wrote this letter said that the
relationship that he has with his educator made him feel more like a son
to the educator rather than a pupil (Letter
Home of a “University” Student, paragraph 2). The young man was
impressed by his educator in many ways and thus had a high respect and
admiration for him. On Educational
Practices: Letters also shows how respected educators were during this
time. In this letter, Pliny stated that there was a young man (a son of a
fellow townsman) that came to “pay his respects” to him (Letters,
paragraph 1). And even beyond the respect held for the educators, there
was an obvious respect for the education given.
On Educational Practices: Letters state that “Probably in no other
age was so much money donated by wealthy men for education – especially
in their home towns – until recently in America.” (Letters,
introduction) This statement can lead one to believe that education was a
significant concern of the people during this time. On Tranquility
of Mind is
an essential primary source for one to read in understanding education in
the time of Ancient Rome. The main idea of this primary source explains
that Roman’s felt that if one had many books that did not mean that s/he
was well educated. It seems as though it was considered an insult to the
educated if a person had books for “show,” rather than having books
for learning. Seneca stated in this piece that “. . . it is in the
houses of the laziest men that you will see a full collection of orations
and history . . .” (On Tranquility
of Mind, 7) Seneca also states that it is “ . . . much better to
surrender yourself to a few authors than wander through many.” (On
Tranquility of Mind, 4) Reading this piece can help one realize that
Ancient Romans took their education very seriously and that they were
insulted by those who did not. The
difference between the education of males and the education of females can
be seen in the primary source The
Ideal Education. In this piece, it is stated that male students were
educated in music, gymnastics, geometry, and oratory (the art of speaking
eloquently). It did not state what female students were educated in, or
even if their education was different from that of males. It is also
stated that “ . . . among boys, good promise is shown . . .” (The
Ideal Education, 2) This shows how Romans had much pride in the
intelligence of the boys amongst them. Quintilianus also mentions that he
were to prefer it if male pupils were to learn the Greek language first
before the Latin language (The Ideal Education, 12). There is very little mention of the
female educational expectancy. In
many of these primary sources, parental guidance and parental involvement
in the children’s education is discussed. The
Training of Children mentions that “the chief thing that fathers are
to look to is that they themselves become effectual examples to their
children . . .” (The Training of
Children, 18) The Ideal
Education mentions that a father should, as soon as his son is born,
have high hopes for his education and intelligence (The
Ideal Education, 1). Horace mentions in On
Roman Educational Practices that his father, “most faithful of
guardians,” was ever present in his studies (On
Roman Educational Practices, paragraph1 1). In Letter Home of a Roman “University” Student, the young man
mentions that he discontinues being educated by Gorgias because his father
requested he did so (Letter of a
Roman “University” Student, paragraph 3). All of these examples
can show one that a child’s education was important to not only the
child, but the family also. Having a well educated child reflected well on
the parents. “
. . . There is no one who has not gained something by study.” (The
Ideal Education, 3) This appears to be the general feeling about
Ancient Roman education. Romans appear to have taken studies very
seriously, feeling that it reflected on what kind of people they were.
Being well educated seemed to lead to being respected and being admired in
Ancient Rome. Education was a very important element to the Ancient
Roman’s lives.
|
|||