AMERICAN
INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS
A consortium of private-equity firms offered $37.6
billion for Equity Office Properties, topping Blackstone's
bid for America's largest real-estate investment trust. The target of the
biggest-ever leveraged buy-out, Equity Office owns 20m square feet (1.9m
square metres) of office space in Manhattan alone, and is attractive because
rents in many of America's business districts are predicted to rise.
- 23 January 2007 ECONOMIST
HISTORICAL:
Foreigners Seem To Be Souring On
U.S. Assets
At a time when U.S. trade deficits are growing to historic
proportions, foreign interest in U.S. stocks and bonds may be fading. If
this continues, there could be consequences for U.S. interest rates and the
dollar.
Foreign purchases of securities in
the U.S. in May came to $56.4 billion. While that was large enough to
finance the current-account deficit, it was down 26% from April and
represented the lowest monthly total in seven months. It also marked the
fourth consecutive monthly decline of such purchases by foreigners.
The report on foreign purchases
included bad news for U.S. stocks, revealing that May was the third
consecutive month foreigners have been net sellers. That hadn't happened in
nearly a decade.
Potentially more troubling was the
slowdown in Asian purchases of U.S. debt -- especially in Japan, which holds
16% of all U.S. Treasurys. That country's nascent economic recovery has
eased the government's concerns about maintaining a weak currency to boost
exports, in turn reducing the Bank of Japan's need to intervene and buy
dollars.
The result: Japan bought $14.6
billion in U.S. Treasurys in May and $5.5 billion in April, according to the
U.S. Treasury Department. That is a significant drop from a monthly average
of $25 billion for the seven-month period ending in March. If the Japanese
economy continues to rebound, Tokyo's Treasury purchases are unlikely to
return to those lofty levels. That has some economists concerned.
"Japan is to the U.S. financial
markets what Saudi Arabia is to the world oil markets -- the primary
provider of capital," Joseph Quinlan, chief market strategist for Banc
of America Capital Management, wrote in a recent report.
"Self-sustained growth in Japan could ultimately obviate the need for
the Bank of Japan to purchase U.S. securities, leaving a buying void in the
U.S. Treasury market, helping to drive yields higher." Bond prices and
yields move in opposite directions.
Indeed, in the two months that
Japanese buying of Treasurys slipped, the yield on the 10-year note jumped
to 4.65% at the end of May from 3.88% on April 1, though it has since fallen
to 4.43%.
The Bank of Japan and other Asian
central banks have become an increasingly important pillar of support for
the Treasury market, because their currency interventions and large trade
surpluses with the U.S. have resulted in excess dollars to invest. Since
these central banks are concerned less about a high rate of return than a
stable and easily tradable investment, U.S. Treasury debt has been a major
beneficiary.
Yet if recent trends toward lower
U.S. investment persist, the U.S. eventually could have a tougher time
funding its current-account deficit, which reached a record $144.9 billion
in the first quarter. Any trouble financing that deficit would lead to
higher borrowing costs through rising U.S. interest rates. It also could
cause the dollar, which hit a three-week high against the euro on Friday, to
resume its decline.
Indeed, problems with the current
account could end up making the dollar "possibly quite a bit
weaker," said John Llwellyn, chief global economist for Lehman
Brothers.
For now, however, funding the
current account shouldn't be a concern, said Rebecca McCaughrin, an
economist for Morgan Stanley. She noted that in 2004 the U.S. needs to
attract a monthly average of $50 billion to fund that deficit. After
averaging $82 billion for the first four months of the year, the U.S. need
attract only about $35 billion a month for the rest of the year.
"Europeans alone could do it," Ms. McCaughrin said.
Still, foreigners now control 40% of
U.S. Treasury debt, and their purchases are unlikely to return to peak
levels seen at the start of the year, she said. "So U.S. interest rates
could still go higher, even if the current account is funded," Ms.
McCaughrin said.
Other foreign investors' appetites
for U.S. securities also have been waning, in part because rising oil prices
have forced some countries to spend more of their dollar reserves on energy.
That leaves fewer dollars to invest in the U.S. markets.
Mr. Quinlan said that is the case
for China, Asia's second-biggest buyer of U.S. securities, which bought $13
billion in U.S. assets through May, compared with $33.1 billion a year
earlier.
The pullback in Beijing's interest
in U.S. Treasurys was larger still: China was a net purchaser of $1.7
billion of U.S. Treasurys in the first five months of the year -- down 91%
from the $18.4 billion in net purchases a year earlier.
Even the United Kingdom, long a
reliable buyer of U.S. securities, turned negative in May, with net sales of
$4 billion. That was its first monthly net sale since October 1998 during
the near collapse of giant U.S. hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management and
the aftermath of the Russia financial crisis. Clear hints from the U.S.
Federal Reserve that it would be raising interest rates likely caused U.K.
investors to trim positions in U.S. Treasurys, Mr. Quinlan said.
Anticipation of the Fed's first rate increase in four years also may have
contributed to the three consecutive months that foreigners sold U.S.
stocks.
By many accounts, however, Japan
remains the critical buyer. Mr. Quinlan argued that Japan has become
"America's de facto banker, helping to keep U.S. interest rates low
over the past year." Currency traders say the Bank of Japan hasn't
intervened in the currency market since March, and the pace of Japanese
Treasury buying of the recent past looks unsustainable: Japan bought $175
billion in U.S. Treasury debt from September to March, a figure that exceeds
Japanese purchases of Treasurys in the previous seven years combined.
Ms. McCaughrin said there has been
anecdotal evidence that private Japanese investors, including banks and
pension funds, also have been scaling back purchases of U.S. assets and have
been investing more locally, to take advantage of a rebounding Japanese
economy, or in other overseas markets, to capitalize on the global economic
expansion. - by Craig Karmin WALL
ST JOURNAL 26 July 2004
In
most of the USA's 50 largest metro areas, annual growth in home prices
in the April-June quarter lagged behind 2001 growth rates, an
indication that not every city is sharing in the hot national real
estate market. The clusters of markets labeled "fast
appreciating" have price growth rates for the April-June quarter
in excess of the 7.4% U.S. average. |
Expensive
metros (Median price: $180,000-plus) |
|
Median
price |
|
Fast-appreciating |
April-June,
2002 |
Annual
price change |
2000 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002* |
New
York City |
$303,800 |
13.3% |
12.2% |
22.3% |
San
Diego |
$361,900 |
16.3% |
10.8% |
21.3% |
Washington/Baltimore |
$249,700 |
3.5% |
17.1% |
20.8% |
Providence |
$185,800 |
7.0% |
14.7% |
20.7% |
Los
Angeles/Orange County |
$276,600 |
8.5% |
11.8% |
18.0% |
Miami/Fort
Lauderdale |
$186,800 |
7.4% |
12.5% |
17.0% |
Sacramento |
$202,100 |
10.4% |
20.0% |
15.8% |
Chicago |
$223,700 |
0.4% |
15.5% |
13.0% |
San
Francisco |
$540,500 |
33.4% |
4.7% |
11.8% |
Boston |
$397,700 |
8.3% |
13.5% |
11.7% |
Moderately
appreciating |
Minneapolis/St.
Paul |
$183,000 |
9.2% |
10.6% |
7.4% |
Seattle |
$260,500 |
n/a |
6.6% |
6.7% |
Portland,
Ore. |
$181,200 |
3.1% |
1.3% |
5.5% |
Denver/Boulder |
$227,700 |
14.9% |
10.9% |
4.0% |
Midrange
metros (Median price: $135,001-$180,000) |
|
Median
price |
Annual
price change |
Fast-appreciating |
April-June,
2002 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002* |
Milwaukee |
$174,500 |
4.0% |
6.2% |
11.9% |
Orlando |
$139,700 |
5.6% |
11.6% |
11.8% |
Philadelphia |
$147,400 |
0.3% |
7.7% |
8.0% |
Phoenix |
$152,400 |
6.3% |
3.7% |
7.9% |
Moderately
appreciating/declining |
Richmond,
Va. |
$143,900 |
1.0% |
2.7% |
6.6% |
Hartford,
Conn. |
$174,700 |
6.1% |
4.6% |
6.1% |
Las
Vegas |
$155,800 |
5.0% |
8.5% |
5.8% |
Atlanta |
$146,900 |
6.1% |
5.8% |
5.2% |
Austin,
Texas |
$160,900 |
11.0% |
6.4% |
3.8% |
Columbus,
Ohio |
$142,200 |
3.3% |
5.1% |
3.5% |
Raleigh/Durham,
N.C. |
$172,900 |
-4.0% |
6.2% |
3.5% |
Charlotte |
$150,500 |
1.5% |
3.6% |
3.2% |
Salt
Lake City |
$150,400 |
2.6% |
4.3% |
2.7% |
Cincinnati |
$136,100 |
5.7% |
2.8% |
2.6% |
Dallas/Fort
Worth |
$136,300 |
5.9% |
7.0% |
2.0% |
Nashville |
$136,900 |
11.6% |
2.8% |
-0.8% |
Low-cost
metros (Median price: Under $135,000) |
|
Median
price |
Fast-appreciating |
April-June,
2002 |
Annual
price change |
2000 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002* |
Oklahoma
City |
$94,400 |
1.4% |
11.2% |
8.5% |
Moderately
appreciating/declining |
New
Orleans |
$125,900 |
2.7% |
4.8% |
7.2% |
San
Antonio |
$111,300 |
5.4% |
8.1% |
6.2% |
Tampa/St.
Petersburg |
$128,000 |
17.9% |
11.6% |
5.6% |
Norfolk,
Va. |
$122,000 |
-1.1% |
3.3% |
5.3% |
Jacksonville |
$117,500 |
5.0% |
9.9% |
5.0% |
Houston |
$131,600 |
10.3% |
5.4% |
4.6% |
Memphis |
$128,400 |
3.9% |
8.2% |
3.7% |
St.
Louis |
$135,000 |
5.3% |
16.2% |
3.0% |
Grand
Rapids, Mich. |
$125,800 |
7.7% |
5.4% |
2.8% |
Pittsburgh |
$102,100 |
4.1% |
4.5% |
2.4% |
Greensboro/Winston-Salem,
N.C. |
$134,400 |
3.6% |
2.6% |
-0.3% |
Indianapolis |
$116,900 |
1.3% |
4.1% |
-0.7% |
Rochester,
N.Y. |
$92,000 |
-0.1% |
5.3% |
-1.0% |
Buffalo |
$85,600 |
-2.0% |
5.4% |
-2.1% |
*
— April-June; Note: Among the largest metros, no comparable data is
available for Detroit, Cleveland, Kansas City, Mo., West Palm Beach,
Fla., and Louisville
Sources:
National Association of Realtors and local boards of real estate
USA
Today 30 August 2002
|
|