End of US highway 400
Approx. time
period
|
East Terminus
|
West Terminus
|
1994-1996
|
(near Joplin, MO)
|
Garden City, KS
|
1996-present
|
(near Joplin, MO)
|
Granada, CO
|
(about 32 k)
Note: since I don't have access to a comprehensive collection of historical
road atlases, much of the info on this page is based on the research of Robert
Droz; click here to view
his site. Photo credits: Steve
Riner; Mike Wiley; me
US 400 was commissioned in 1994. Its east end is outside Joplin
MO, at its interchange with I-44. You can view photos from there on this
page.
Originally the west end of US 400 was in Garden City KS. This
first photo is looking south on the US 50/US 83 bypass, at the
interchange where US 50/US 400 traffic exits onto Fulton Street:
me, Nov. 2001
This bypass had already been built by the time US 400 was commissioned, so
it's likely that the sign above would've marked the exit to the west beginning
of US 400. The shot below is looking west on Fulton (US 50/US 400):
me, Nov. 2001
Today the bypass carries US 83, and US 50/400 traffic is routed onto it too.
But when it was first commissioned, the US 400 designation ended at this interchange.
If you ask me, US 400 shouldn't have ever made it even as far west as Garden
City - there's no good reason why it shouldn't end at its junction with US 50
in Dodge City. Clearly KDoT feels differently: for whatever reason, they must've
wanted US 400 to run across the entire state, because within two years US 400
had been signed even further west with US 50, through the remainder of Kansas.
Since then, the west end of US 400 is about 15 miles west of the Kansas border,
in Granada CO. In other words, the westernmost 135 miles of US 400 are on a
pointless duplex with US 50. I'm guessing CDoT accepted US 400 only because
AASHTO probably stipulated that it couldn't end at a stateline, so CDoT decided
to be a good neighbor to Kansas by agreeing to the US 400 designation. But they
clearly have no use for it, as evidenced by the fact that it ends at the first
opportunity: at its junction with US 385. Until recently, CDoT signage in Granada
didn't even bother mentioning US 400, and there were a grand total of two US
400 signs anywhere in Colorado. Below is a photo of the last westbound US 400
sign:
Wiley, 2000
That sign is between Holly and Granada - as I recall, it was posted just past
Prowers Co. Rd. 30, which goes north to serve the town of Hartman. Not far ahead,
you reach the town of Granada - the photo below is looking west on Goff Avenue
(US 50). US 400 has been co-signed with US 50 to this point, but here at Main
Street (US 385) that designation ends:
me, Nov. 2001
The shot below is looking the opposite direction (east on US 50/US
385). From here, US 385 heads north on Main, while US 50 continues
ahead on Goff. The US 400 designation also begins ahead:
me, Nov. 2001
Within the next few years, that assembly had been replaced, and two additional
shields appeared:
Riner,
Aug. 2005
That's the only mention of US 400 in Granada; Steve reports the other sign
assemblies had also been replaced, but none of them included any reference to
US 400. (It's odd that there's a CO hwy. 196 marker on that eastbound assembly.
To get there, you cross the Arkansas River via US 385, and then 196 begins by
heading back to the west - likely not a very common traffic pattern. Our guess
is that the intention was to have that marker included on the westbound
assembly, but that a mistake was made somewhere along the line.) Below is yet
another photo of the same intersection, this time looking south on Main, or
US 385:
me, Nov. 2001
In that photo, if you turn left, you're on US 400 as well as US 50. Heading
that direction, the first reassurance marker looks like this:
me, Nov. 2001
That's about a half-mile east of Granada (you can click
here if you'd like to see another [non-highway] photo from there). US 400
irks me, because it's a stupid number. The number "400" implies that
it's a branch of US highway Zero - or possibly US 100 - neither of which exist.
And the really annoying thing is, this wasn't just some lame idea that Kansas
came up with. No, AASHTO actually offered this number to KDoT. In other
words: the organization that's supposed to be the guardian of the integrity
of the US highway system gave its blessing to this completely non-sensical number.
Page created 20 June 2000; last updated 26 September 2006.
|