Historic US highway endpoints in Amarillo TX
Highway
|
Approx. time period
|
US
366 [I] |
1926-1932 |
|
1928-1930 |
|
1930-1932 |
|
1931-1939 |
Photo credits: Steven
Nelson
Amarillo may well be the grand champion of decommissioned highways (or grand
loser, depending how you look at it): of the eight US routes that have served
the city, five of them no longer exist.
That could be a misleading statement, though, so let me clarify: it's not that
the roadways themselves have disappeared. Rather, Amarillo was originally served
by several shorter branch routes, which were later swallowed up by extensions
of longer routes. As a result, several US route numbers that once graced the
streets of Amarillo have been retired - in fact, offhand, I'd guess more than
most cities.
When the US routes were first commissioned in 1926, Amarillo found itself at
the junction of north-south US 385 [I] (which ran along Fillmore Street), and
east-west US 66 (which headed west of Fillmore via South 6th Avenue,
and originally went east of Fillmore using South 10th Avenue). Also,
US 366 [I] came into town heading northeast from El Paso. It met US 385 at Canyon
(about 16 miles south of Amarillo), but according to route logs, instead of
ending there, it was co-signed with US 385 up to Amarillo. So it came in on
Fillmore, and it may have ended where it junctioned US 66 at S. 10th. But it
also may have been signed up to the main highway junction at the center of town:
S. 6th and Fillmore.
Then in 1928, US 164 [I] was commissioned: it served traffic coming into Amarillo
from the northeast. US 164 arrived via North 8th Avenue (now Amarillo Boulevard),
so the designation could've ended where it met US 385 (at Fillmore). However,
I think it's more likely that US 164 would've been co-signed down to meet US
66 at S. 6th (possibly the same endpoint as US 366, which makes one wonder why
US 164 wasn't instead numbered as a northeastward extension of US 366).
Anyway: by the late 1920's, Amarillo was served by those four US routes, which
led out of the city in five different directions, and which branched out to
seven within a 16-mile radius. But as soon as the 1930's rolled around, the
route numbers began to change, and by the end of that decade, four of them were
history.
In 1930, US 60 was extended eastward from Missouri to Amarillo. The westernmost
segment of this extension was along what had been US 164, so that was the first
of Amarillo's route numbers to be retired. US 60 would've had the same endpoint
as US 164 for a year or two, before it was extended again: this time westward
out of Amarillo. And since this extension was along US 366, it was what brought
about the demise of that route.
However, Amarillo also gained a US route designation right about this
time: US 370 came northwestward from Wichita Falls. Originally it met US 66
at "Claude" (according to route logs, but actually it seems more likely that
Washburn was the exact terminus - see my US
370 page). Although this junction is about 16 miles east of Amarillo (same
distance as Canyon), for some reason US 370 was not multiplexed into Amarillo
(like US 366 was). Rather, it ended in Washburn until about 1931. At that time,
US 66 was straightened east of Amarillo, such that it no longer went through
Washburn (it now left town using N. 8th, rather than S. 10th). It was then that
US 370 was extended into Amarillo, along the route of former US 66. In other
words, it would've come into town on S. 10th, meeting US 385 at Fillmore. It
could've ended there, but again, I believe it would've made more sense to co-sign
it north on Fillmore to end at the "new" US 66 at S. 6th.
That lasted until 1940, which is when a southeastward-expanding US 287 eliminated
the US 370 designation. Meanwhile, it was about 1935 when US 385 was replaced
by a southern extension of US 87. And the fifth (and final) US route to be removed
from Amarillo was US 66, which was decommissioned in 1985. What this means is:
every one of the seven original US routes that branched out of Amarillo in the
1920's has been renumbered.
So: did you pick up on the pattern? While it's possible that some routes ended
at Fillmore north of downtown (on N. 8th) and others may have ended to
the south (on S. 10th), I tend to believe that all four of them would've
been signed to the central highway junction (at S. 6th). Below are photos
of all three intersections; this first one is looking north on Fillmore at S.
10th:
Nelson, Jan. 2006
This was northbound US 385 (and later eastbound US 60). Until 1931, westbound
US 66 came in from the right, and then continued straight ahead before turning
west again on S. 6th. So US 366 (which was co-signed with US 385) could've ended
here. After 1931, when US 66 no longer used S. 10th, US 370 came in from the
right. Again, it could've ended here, but I think it would've made sense to
co-sign both routes ahead four blocks, to S. 6th.
Below we're looking east on Amarillo Blvd (nee N. 8th):
Nelson, Jan. 2006
Running across the photo on Fillmore was US 385 (Fillmore originally ran both
directions). It's possible that US 164 (and later US 60) began straight ahead,
but I think it's more likely that they were both co-signed south on Fillmore
to S. 6th.
So how about a photo of Amarillo's central highway junction? Here it is, looking
west on 6th:
Nelson, Jan. 2006
I'm not sure why there's a US 66 sign here - I haven't found any evidence that
US 66 ever used 6th east of Fillmore. However, straight ahead (on the other
side of Fillmore) was westbound US 66. Eastbound was to the left before 1931,
but to the right after then. Also to the right (I believe) was the west beginning
of US 164 from 1928 to 1930, and the west beginning of US 60 from 1930 to 1932.
To the left was probably the north beginning of US 366 from 1926 to 1932, and
the west beginning of US 370 from 1931 to 1939.
This page created 13 January 2006; last updated 19 January 2006.
|