L I G H T N I N G
To
read the July 4, 2008 additions to this page.
Click
here
Note!
The following
is only a postulate, not fact!
It seems to answers troubling questions about where lightning originates and it is a good model that fits the known parameters of lightning. It predicts positive and negative lightning strokes and matches the envelope of knowledge that we posses about lightning like an expensive tailor made suit.
Copyright 1998 by Lynn Mills
While working with his research team at a National Severe Storms Laboratory on a mountain top in New Mexico, Dr. David Rust said, "I think that we don't really understand how it, (lightning), gets started. We don't know how you get a big enough electric field. How do you get it big enough to cause the air to break down?"
Some scientists
suggest that
lightning is the result of cosmic particles from space bombarding
the earth's atmosphere causing charges to separate. Others
theorize that lightning is the result of charges that are
separated by water being ripped from ice pellets. That dust or ice
particles bumping into each other causes charges to separate and
thus creates a potential
for lightning. If the cosmic particle
theory were true why don't intense solar flares cause
corresponding fluctuations in thunderstorm intensities. If the
ice theory were true, why do storms that contain no ice, (which
is detectable by radar) still produce lightning Why do newly forming or
condensing clouds immediately begin showing a charge and polarity. By
the same
token if the dust particle theory were true then large dust
storms or volcanic dust that gets caught up in a thunderstorm
should show a marked increase in the storms intensity. Why is
there a direct correlation, (as shown by NASA studies), between
the amount of rain in a storm and the amount of lightning? Why
should the volume of rain in a storm have anything to do with how
much lightning is produced?
~~~~~~~~~ Because Lightning is a product of condensation! ~~~~~~~~~~
It
is part of
the water cycle we all learned about in school.
Charge separation is as much a part of evaporation as is heat transfer
and I would go so far as to say that there can be no heat transfer
without charge separation. I believe the electron is the vehicle
for heat transfer during evaporation and without the
transfer of heat and electrons during evaporation there would
be no lighting and thunderstorms.
The
Postulate!
Water
molecules in
the liquid state share electrons covalently. This enables liquid
water molecules to exist at a lower energy state and is the
factor that makes water behave as a liquid. How ever when energy
in the form of heat is available the water molecules use this
heat energy to lock up a full compliment of electrons in the
valence band or a perfect dot diagram of eight electrons. The
molecule is now free to move about independently and is now a gas
and refuses to share any of its electrons with its neighbors. It
jumps into the atmosphere and leaves behind fewer electrons to be
shared by the rest of the liquid water molecules in the ocean.
As
the gas H2O
molecules cool and loose
their heat energy they also lose the ability to maintain a full
compliment of electrons and the gas molecules are forced to
condense with each other, become liquid, and once again share
electrons. In the process they give up the surplus heat and
electrons they can no longer afford to maintain. So
in the long view energy from
the sun enables the charge separation which is responsible for
lightning. If
condensation
is fast enough and in sufficient amounts then a lightning storm
ensues. Extremely rapid condensation in the huge thunder heads that
occur in the central and southern U.S. and prairies of Canada result in
spectacular lightning displays. I have witnessed a lightning storm in
Saskatchewan Canada in which the lightning was almost continuous and
the thunder just kept rumbling non stop.
So you see, lightning is
merely
a part of the water cycle.
From Ocean to sky to earth again.
Isn't it just like nature to recycle?
What evidence is there to support this lightning theory?
1. I have witnessed rapidly condensing freon producing sparks of static electricity.
2. I have monitored a static meter at a Minute Man Missile repair site and observed charges immediately begin to build as small clouds formed in a blue sky on a calm day. Why do charges separate in very small, newly forming clouds on a calm day? It can't be by the currently accepted and widely taught, Large Particle / Small Particle / Updraft theory! There can be only one answer. *Electro release condensation!
3. Why do ground fogs carry a charge? What is the mechanism that separates the charge associated with fog? It can only be,*Electro-release condensation!
4. Ninety percent of cloud to ground lightning strikes are negative cloud to positive ground. Just as it should be if condensing water droplets in cloud formations free electrons.
5. When Dr. David Rust and his team sent a probe into the anvil of a thunder head they had a big surprise. Current theory said that the upper levels of a thunder cell should be positive. Instead of recording only high positive charges as they had supposed the probe recorded unexpectedly, a large area of high negative charge in the anvil. JUST WHAT YOU WOULD EXPECT in an area of a cloud that is both condensing and dissipating, (by evaporation).
6. NASA has established that there is a direct ratio between the volume of rain produced in a storm and the amount of lightning it produces.
7. In an article by Dr. Hugh J. Christian & Melanie A. McCook, http://ghrc.msfc.nasa.gov/lightning/primertext.html (positive lightning strikes), negative earth to positive cloud, lightning strikes are discussed. They are mentioned as,
"an
appreciable minority... of the total lightning strikes.... These
positive lightning flashes often occur during the dissipating (evaporating),
phase of
a
thunderstorms life".
This is
exactly what my
postulate predicts. Dissipating storms are in an evaporating
stage and evaporation ties up free electrons and produces the positive
charges that result in a
positive lightning strike.
8. While observing a large thunder storm as it passed over the top of the Wasatch mountain range and continued bombarding the Morgan Valley on the other side of the mountains we were treated to a spectacular sight. As My brothers and I watched the lightning flash downward and then behind the mountains. We saw fingers of lightning drain towards the part of the cloud that had just flashed to the ground. First the lightning fingers began immediately around the flash point and then more and more and more each time migrating further and further from the flash point, like a domino effect, but still draining to the flash point. It continued after each lightning strike until the last fingers of lightning were nearly over us and still draining all the way back to the original flashes. The lightning fingers didn't stop draining until they had drained what seemed to be the entire thunder head. Since then I have seen the same sequence of draining fingers of lightning on video. This appears to indicate that a lot more of the cloud is negative than positive. It appears that much of the inter cloud lightning is from negative to less negative regions.
9. Research by two separate teams, Studwell and Orville (1995) and Holle and Watson, (1996) Discovered a predominance of positive lightning flashes, (delivering net positive charge to ground), in areas of freezing rain. Again this is exactly what my theory predicts. As water freezes it becomes negatively charged. Since freezing rain becomes frozen on contact with the ground, (respectively) it imparts a negative charge to the ground on freezing. Any lightning discharge would be negative ground to positive cloud which constitutes a positive lightning flash! The net result of the discharge is a positive charge left on the ground and a negative charge delivered to the cloud!
10. Laboratory experiments directed by E J Workman at the New Mexico Institute of mining and technology Back up the freezing rain theory by showing that when dilute solutions of water are frozen a large electric potential develops between the water and the ice. The experiments show that the ice gains a negative charge while the water retains a positive charge. Again exactly what the theory of Electron Transfer Via Matter State Change predicts
11. Here is a copy of a letter I received. Thanks to Mr. Paul Brunson for giving me permission to publish it here.
Lynn,
We
have a static
shock problem at my plant on top of a structure. If you touch the
hand rail, any metal up there or even the guy next to you, you
get a pretty good shock. There is a small pin hole steam leak
from a high pressure steam line blowing onto the structure and
you, if you walk through it. My question is whether the steam
condensing on the metal hand rails and our bodies could be
releasing electrons like your lightning sources paper suggest?
Then when we touch each other or the hand rails we get a static
shock to equalize the charge.
Any input would be appreciated,
Paul Brunson
Olin Corporation
Charleston, TN
12. Pictured below is a machine that was built one hundred and fifty years ago by Sir William George Armstrong. It is a steam boiler standing on glass legs to insulate it from the ground. The steam was exhausted through small jets and allowed to condense on a metal pate which was electrically isolated from the boiler. Amazingly the static build up on the metal plate was enough to jump a spark up to two feet. OUCH! The theory then being that the static was due to friction. (I'll add more as I get additional information). Thanks to Michael Foster for sending this information.
13. Maintenance crews and rescue workers who have a lot of experience around helicopters are painfully aware of the large static shock they can receive when a chopper is operating above moisture. The area of the prop wash is so extensive that large amounts of moisture are evaporated rapidly creating a highly charged area around the helicopter.
14. The following is a letter received from Andrew Sweeney. Thanks Andrew for giving me permission to publish it here.
Lynn, I just want to drop you a line on a really well thought out theory. I did a degree in Chemistry and Physics and can understand all the stuff in here and at last someone has come up with a plausible answer to this question. Well done and I am going to ask a few people around the traps if they can better the theory or come up with some pointers.
Andrew Sweeney
Brisbane Queensland Australia
15. The following I received
from Eric A.
Eikenberry. Thanks Eric for
letting me publish your letter.
16. And yet another note from Eric Anderson
I am amazed at this theory. It is the most reasonable and complete theory I have ever seen on the subject. I am currently a college student, and i think that i am going to try to create the experiment that you suggested. Has anyone else attempted it? If your theory does prove to be true, the implications are extreme. We could be looking at a future power source. Also, have you published this theory? If you haven't please do...if it is correct, you should get all the credit. I will keep you updated about the experiment Great Work, Eric Anderson.
Thanks Eric for permission to publish this.
The "Mills Law of Electron Transfer Via Matter State Changes," says
That when matter changes states, (solid to liquid, liquid to solid, liquid to gas or gas to liquid), there will be a corresponding transfer of electrons in a direct ration to the amount of heat transfered.
So the mills Law predicts that in any cloud formations the areas of the clouds that are condensing will have a negative charge or a surplus of electrons resulting in cloud to ground negative lightning strikes. In the parts of the clouds that are dissipating due to evaporation there will be a loss of free electrons or a positive charge and any lightning from these dissipating regions will be a positive ground to cloud lightning strike. Also, freezing portions of the cloud will become more negative and thawing portions will become more positive. That the volume and rapidity of condensation determines how much lightning is produced.
The Mills Law if true has far reaching implications. One example. If the Earth is cooling and rock is changing states from liquid to solid you would expect the Earth to carry a net negative charge. On the other hand if the Earth is heating up then the Mills law says you will find the Earth to carry a net positive charge because the rocks are going from solid state to liquid.
This law doesn't just affect lightning storms but also involves anything that changes states from solid to liquid, from liquid to gas or visa versa. I would even go so far as to propose that scraping our feet across a new carpet, (which produces heat in the thousands of degrees), generates the static charge by vaporizing on a micro scale carpet fibers and then instantly condensing them creating a charge separations that accumulates on our bodies.
Summary
In summation then
you can
expect to see many more lightning storms in parts of the country
where there is the potential for large amounts of moisture to be
carried to great heights and cooled rapidly, such as the plains
of the U.S. and the prairie provinces of Canada. Especially in
the Southern U.S. where hot and cool airs collide. This produces
rapid condensation and rapid build up of charges resulting in dramatic
and severe lightning storms. In the
northwestern U.S and western coastal Canada there is plenty of
moisture.
It is relatively cool though and seldom collides with hot moist
air. It condenses slowly in most cases, giving charges from
condensation time to bleed off. The result is drizzle with few
lightning and thunderstorms. This theory seems to fit the known facts
of
lightning and thunderstorms and in fact predicts them. It is a good
model and
seems to hold true to the conditions that we observe relating to
lightning. It is the only theory that fits the signature and
characteristics of lightning from it's birth in the oceans and
quiet ascension into the heavens to it's fiery and noisy return
to earth again.
* "Electro-release condensation" is the release of an electron from the outer valance at the point of condensation and conversely "electro-nabbed evaporation" is the capture of an electron during evaporation. Coined phrases
Copyright 1998 by Lynn Mills
I
am honored to display this
award from Study Web and also The Best of Pod from Tripods Weather Pod
I
value your inpute whether you endorse this theory or not. Any
suggestions or comments are greatly appreciated. If you have
experienced or know of any strange, unusual, or interesting
phenomena that might relate to this lightning paper please
contact me. I would like to hear from you. You may reach me at
the email address below. Thank you for visiting my site. Lynn
Mills
This
site constructed and maintained by Evan L mills
wwindmills@comcast.net
Page
first placed on the internet Nov. 97
Last modified
December
9, 2004
November 11, 1998 - November 15, 1998 - December 10, 1998
12 January 1999 - 1 March 1999 - 6 March, 1999 - 14 March, 1999 - 3
June
2000
15 Oct 2005 Oct. 28, 2005. Feb,. 23, 2009
Web master is Lynn Mills wwindmills@comcast.net