norhayati

[sangkancil] MESSAGE FOR MF SANGKANCILERS.

---------------------------------------------
To sangkancil@malaysia.net
From "Lee Wat You" <imamdawood@hotmail.com>
Date Sat, 06 Nov 1999 10:40:03 GMT
Delivered-To mailing list sangkancil@malaysia.net
Mailing-List contact sangkancil-help@malaysia.net; run by ezmlm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MESSAGE FOR MF SANGKANCILLERS.

Doctor Maamor MF Mengele is lying.   The Doctor has said that a 15 year old child by the name of Norhayati just appeared in his clinic
looking for   treatment. Out of his duty of care for the sick he
treated her. He cared for her so much that he even made her stay in his clinic for the night.   This would be a first in the history of medical practise in Malaysia.

Lots of young women become pregnant out of wedlock and many of them   go   to the clinic. Even the 14 year old daughter of   Ustaz Ismail Kamus
became pregnant   and she also went to a see a doctor. They are all frowned upon. None have been offered a   place to stay by anyone,
not even the doctors treating them.

But Dr Maamor MF Mengele   went further. He even accompanied his friend the MF Cikgu Zainal and they took along with them the 15 year
old child   to a school for wayward girls (the Putri Wilayah school or something).    The doctor was stretching his duty of care from the medical field right across to the   field of education.   He was jumping
from the Hippocratic Oath to the Hypocrites Oath.

(IN the meantime back in the doctor's clinic, his other patients were dying of neglect because the doctor had decided to focus all his
attention on a 15 year old child - whom he had never met before - to ensure that she received the best education that the country could provide her at the Putri Wilayah school. What a nive and caring   doctor).

And lo and behold the headmaster of the school for wayward girls was also their friend. They were all in cahoots. (Haven't    any of you
Sangkancil MF     explored trhe ABIM connection yet ?)

The truth is the 15 year old child was kidnapped and kept by the doctor in his clinic which were against the laws of the land. Someone (like the UMNO assholes - if they had any brains) should lodge a police
report against the MF Doctor and the MF Cikgu Zainal for taking her from Malacca to KL and keeping her here   and there.

The   MF Doctor   Maamor Mengele   also said that he wanted to help the girl get transferred to the Putri Wilayah school.   If any of you Sangkancil MF read the Education Act you will find out that NO ONE - NO ONE at all, not even the Minister of Education, the headmaster, the Director of Education and least of all the MF Cikgu Zainal, who was only a
school teacher, NO ONE can order the transfer of any child to any school without the consent of the child and the parents/guardians or thru the order of a juvenile court.

One more MF who is hiding in the background of this plot is a 'lecturer at the International Islamic University'. This is none other than the same ABIM MF who at one time wanted to topple Rahim Tambi
Chik and become the Chief Minister of Melaka. Who are we talking about here ? Dr Sidek Baba of course. He was mentioned just once in one of
the papers. These were the MF behind this little plot.

The real story is that the MF plotters had got hold of this young child who has had a bit of a history. (Well quite a lot of history but we will   not go into that. She is married now and just wants to get along with her
life). She also had a sister who was well known to Rahim Tambi Chik. Their relationship was shall we say 'very cordial'.   (And we all agree
that the MF   Rahim Tambi Chik was no angel).

The child was threatened with incarceration in the Putri Wilayah school   (for her other activities which were known to her discipline teacher Cikgu Zainal) if she would not cooperate.

Why the interference of MF Cikgu Zainal, the MF Doctor and the MF Sidek Baba and the MF Ibrahim Chendol etc ?   Because there was no police
complaint lodged by the girl against Rahim Tambi Chik. She never pressed
any charges against Rahim Tambi Chik : ))))    Later when the AG investigated there was no evidence available. (Hence the goof up by Lim Guan Eng - who has destroyed his own career because he never used his brains correctly).

This is the same thing   that was done to Ummi Hafilda. They had her arrested, tortured, 'turned over' then they forced her to sign a confession.

Then we come to the child's grandmother, one old lady by the name of Pundek Ahmad.    If any of you Sangkancillers can remember anything at all
- this Pundek Ahmad was called to testify at Lim Guan Eng's sedition trial. She was not able to testify very well becauise she kept fainting
in the court. Finally she was only able to say a few things. Everyone said
what a brave woman she was.

Now we see that there is a lot of similarity between her fainting in court and Brader Liwat's headaches in court (By the way, Brader Liwat's
headaches disappear as soon as he reaches his jail cell). They sent Brader Liwat for a brain scan. Results : Nothing inside.

This lady Pundek Ahmad is bent on telling the whole world that her
grand daughetr is a WHORE. (My granddaughter was screwed by Rahim Tambio Chik , I tell you ! I know !). What a fantastic grandma. The
child's father has come out defending his daughter. The child's father says the girl is telling the truth. But not the grandmother Pundek Ahmad.
She insists the granddaughertr was a whore.   Not surprisingly the child has not spoken to her grandmother since 1995. What a grandma
!

Now we come to the message for the MF Sangkancillers. Before when Ummi Hafilda was arrested, tortured, turned over and then forced to confess -
NONE OF YOU Sangkancil MF came out to defend a young woman.

Now we hear the story of a 15 year old child who had the same thing done to her. She was   held against her will (WITHOUT ANY CHARGES OR LEGAL
ACTION TAKEN AGAINST HER BY THE PROPER AUTHORITIES) by a MF school teacher, a MF Doctor and another MF school headmaster. Finally she was forced to sign a confession.

What are you MF Sangkancillers doing ?   What we see here on this list is assholes   trying to cast aspersions on the child's
testimony.    And none of you can think clearly or speak up against   things that are obviously not right.

If you cannot speak up and defend the women and children in this country,   then what are you MF really hoping to achieve ?   Maybe next time,
one of your daughters, granddaughters or wives will get caught up in this type of a situation. What will you do then ?

p.s. MF stands for Muther Fu**er.

What Is The Truth Behind The Rahim-Norhayati Affair?
Early in the week, Norhayati Mohamad Yusop went public to declare that she never had any affair with Rahim Tambi Chik, the ex-Chief Minister of Melaka. The next day, her grandmother also went public to declare she HAD. Which is the truth? Will we ever know?

To get a better understanding of the matter, one has to go back to the time it was all supposed to have happened. News had just hit the streets that Rahim was having an affair with an under-aged girl. Then the girl mysteriously disappeared and her grandmother, who was her legal guardian then, became frantic. Not long after, more than a dozen people were charged and sentenced for having sex with this same girl. To close the whole episode, the Attorney General declared that they do not have enough evidence to prosecute Rahim for the same offense.

It makes one wonder what was the basis of charging this string of “sex offenders”, who were charged based on the mere strength of the girl’s testimony that they did have sex with her. This same testimony, however, was not good enough to charge Rahim. In Rahim’s case they needed evidence – which they say they could not find – whereas the same evidence was not required to find the rest guilty of a crime.

Was this whole exercise merely to demonstrate that this girl was of loose morals and, therefore, whatever she says is not credible? It was credible enough to find everyone else guilty.

Now the girl declares, at that material time, she was forced to lie and one of those who were instrumental in forcing her was a senior police officer. Isn’t this something criminal and shouldn’t the police now be pressing charges against this criminal police officer who had illegally used force to get an under-aged girl to lie?

Rahim says he was the victim and not the conspirator. If so how does he explain the book, “50 Dalil”, which was printed on premises owned by him? Anwar subsequently obtained an injunction against the book but it General Assembly, plus it was distributed to all officers in the Ministry. How was this possible unless there was a concerted effort to discredit Anwar and a team of conspirators working in the background?

There seems to be many unanswered questions and the matter can in no way just end here. If Norhayati did lie then, and if she was forced to lie, and as she has now identified who the culprits were, action needs to be taken against these people. However, if she did not lie then but IS lying now, is she being forced to do so? And therefore by whom? This sounds like nothing more than a public confession in a string of public confessions that we have been seeing over this last year.

Norhayati said her reason for “coming clean” is because her name was mentioned in the Anwar Ibrahim trial and she no longer wants her name to be dragged into the trial. Now the truth seems to be slowly emerging. It looks like it all has to do with the Anwar Ibrahim trial. They must be planning to disallow some of the statements made by Dato Seri Anwar from being used by the defense – and he certainly has made a lot of damaging statements since he took the witness stand.

Before this it was Murad’s “confession”. Now it’s Norhayati’s turn. Who’s next? I heard there are dozens more “come clean public confessions” planned - all aimed at ruining Anwar’s credibility and blocking as much of his testimony as possible. What will we see next? The Hong Leong boss “coming clean”? ABRAR’s boss “repenting”? Dato’ Ishak “regretting”? The Menteri Besar of Johor “telling all”?

Well, stay tuned for the next episode in this never-ending drama series called, “I Have Turned Over A New Leaf And Would Like To Publicly Confess My Sins”.

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The Real Story Of The Rahim-Norhayati Affair
     Last night, Norhayati Mohamad Yusop made a public declaration that she was never      involved with Rahim Tambi Chik, the disgraced ex-Chief Minister of Melaka. This      has just added a new twist to the whole episode, which not only saw the downfall of
Rahim, but also the jailing of Lim Guan Eng. As the say, the plot thickens, but what is      the real story behind the Rahim-Norhayati affair - or was there even one in the first      place?

     Well, recently I interviewed someone from Melaka, a man very much involved with      the whole episode, and here is his story.

     “Rahim called me one day to tell me he was having an affair with this girl and that it     was now giving him some political problems. He asked me to help resolve the problem. Rahim trusted me because I already had some business dealings with him.
     He had given me a 1,000 acre piece of land along the PLUS Highway not far from
     Melaka, so I had an obligation to help him out.

     Actually, in the beginning, Rahim was not having an affair with Norhayati, but with her
     elder sister, a bar girl whom Rahim was meeting often for sex. One day Rahim    phoned her house and Norhayati answered the phone instead. She told Rahim that
     her elder sister was not home. She also told Rahim that she had been meaning to    contact him because she needed to see him about something. Rahim then asked her   to come to his office.

     Norhayati went to Rahim’s office that same afternoon and told Rahim she needed to    borrow some money. Rahim told her he had no money on him then and asked her to
     come back the next day, but to come after 5.00pm when the staff had all gone home.

     Norhayati went back the next day as instructed and that was the first time they had     sex – right there in Rahim’s office. Since then they met regularly for sex. Norhayati    was in it just for the money.

     I, together with two other friends, kidnapped Norhayati and took her to Sungai   Golok in Thailand. Rahim gave us RM20,000.00 cash to take care of our expenses.
     In Golok we questioned the girl at length and tape-recorded the conversation. The
     girl gave us all the details of her sex sessions with Rahim, even telling us Rahim’s    sexual preferences, which was quite kinky and at times sick.

     I then brought the tape back to Rahim and played it for him to hear. Rahim then
     asked me to meet the girl’s parents and negotiate a settlement with them, which I did.
     The girl’s father wanted RM500,000.00 plus another RM250,000.00 for the girl. I
     also asked another RM250,000.00 for our “team”. All in all Rahim had to fork out     RM1 million to settle this matter. I also handed the tape to Rahim and assured him    there were no more copies though I did make one copy to keep just in case Rahim
     did not pay me my RM250,000.00.

     The girl was very “hot”. In fact, while in Golok, all three of us also had a go at her.
     She was a real nymphomaniac and enjoyed sex so much.

     The 1,000 acre land that Rahim gave me was subsequently sold to HICOM but I     heard they could not get approval to build the industrial park that they had applied   for. The Melaka government wanted HICOM to build low cost houses on the land,
     which was impossible on that piece of land.

     You can still see the HICOM signboard on the land beside the PLUS Highway if you    drive to Melaka. My brother, who is the Chairman of a public listed company, and a
     partner with HICOM, arranged to sell the land to HICOM. What made me very   angry is that I did not receive one Sen from the sale of the land”.

Barrage of allegations bewilders Malaysian voters

PENANG - Malaysians are being treated to a dizzying exchange of allegations between the government and the opposition, leaving many bewildered in the run-up to the most bitterly contested election in years.

The latest claims were made by relatively unknown figures, but their impact may yet have an impact on public opinion.

In a seven-page declaration on October 28, a former assistant governor of Malaysia's central bank, Bank Negara, alleged that he was made use of by then deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim to finance Anwar's political agenda, using funds from a 3 billion ringgit ($790 million) war chest.

Abdul Murad Khalid accused Anwar, now the opposition's main rallying point, of maintaining more than 20 master accounts through his ''cronies'' to fund his political activities. He claimed he personally knew of nine parties, including Anwar himself, being paid various sums totalling $32 million between 1992 and 1997. These recipients, Murad alleged, included key figures in the opposition such as Chandra Muzaffar, deputy president of Anwar's wife's National Justice Party (keADILan), and social reform group Aliran.

Denying the claim on November 3, Chandra slapped Murad with an $18.4 million libel suit. Aliran has said it will file legal proceedings soon. Other parties named in the declaration have also denied the charge.

Murad had resigned from Bank Negara on February 1, and was charged on September 16 for failing to declare assets worth 23 million ringgit. His case is pending. Murad's claim signaled a countermove against the political opposition led by Anwar, who had been claiming corruption on the part of several of Mahathir's ministers and saying in court there was a political conspiracy behind the premier's dismissal of him last year.

On November 2, a factory worker who triggered the resignation of a key official of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad's dominant United Malays National Organization five years ago, stunned Malaysians with her claim that she had lied about their affair.

Norhayati Mohamad Yusop, now 20, whose identity had hitherto been kept confidential, told a press conference on November 2: ''I was kidnapped and kept in Kuala Lumpur for two weeks where I was taught and forced to lie to the prime minister and the police in Bukit Aman [police headquarters].'' Her statement reversed her own allegations in 1994, which forced then Malacca chief minister Rahim Tamby Chik to resign from all government and party posts, amid public outrage. The case also led to the one-year jailing of opposition lawmaker Lim Guan Eng, who had championed the girl's cause as a rape victim, on charges of ''sedition'' and ''publishing false news''. Rahim is seen as a bitter foe of Anwar, who was convicted of corruption last year and is now being tried on sodomy charges.

Anwar said in court recently that Mahathir had directed him to tell Rahim to resign after the scandal with the underage girl surfaced. ''A few weeks later, Rahim came to my office and I asked him to write his resignation letter as directed by the prime minister,'' said Anwar.

On November 3, Norhayati's shattered grandmother, Pendek Ahmad, flanked by Lim and opposition politicians, told a press conference that she believed that her granddaughter was lying the previous day when she denied the affair with Rahim. ''I believe she has been pressured and used by certain parties to make the declaration and statement denying the affair,'' Pendek said. Her remarks add yet another complicating twist to the matter. This has led to talk of possible political motives behind the newest denial by Norhayati.

Analysts say it is hard to gauge the impact of these 'revelations', but there are signs many urban dwellers are sceptical about both Murad's allegations against Anwar and Norhayati's claim that she was forced to lie. Others wonder about the identities of the masterminds, if there are any, behind the statutory declarations. Fresh on their minds are earlier statements by others linked to Anwar who said they were coerced while in custody into implicating Anwar in various misdeeds and ''confessing'' their involvement.

''Most Malaysians have reached a threshold of disbelief in anything the government has to say now,'' says human rights activist and former opposition member of parliament Kua Kia Soong. ''I think we are suffering a crisis of credibility at the moment. People have made up their minds.'' Kua concedes, however, that he can only speak for the people he knows and not for those from, say, rural areas, where conditions are different.

Some analysts see the latest revelations as ''overkill'' in efforts by the government's allies to discredit Anwar - not least because talk is rife that the Mahathir government could call elections soon. He has until June 2000 to do so, but is widely believed to be gauging the right time to call a snap poll. A judgment by government supporters that they have the upper hand against Anwar's camp is likely to affect the poll's timing.

Recent developments - such as independent medical test results released on October 5 that show no clinical evidence of arsenic poisoning of Anwar - do not help the case of the Barisan Alternatif (Alternative Front) coalition of Malaysia's main opposition parties. Earlier, Anwar's allies and family had said he was suffering from arsenic poisoning while in custody, triggering some of the biggest protest rallies since his arrest in September 1998.

Likewise, there is little time for the Barisan Alternatif, which has opted for Anwar as its prime ministerial candidate, to fight back. Indeed, some observers now believe the election may be held later this month or in January.

Either way, for Malaysian voters it means more political salvos to come.

(Inter Press Service)

Kenyataan Sabri bin Mohamed Yasin Bagi Pihak Ibunya Pendek binti Ahmad, Nenek Kepada Noryati Binti Mohamad Yusop, Mangsa Rogol Yang Terlibat Dengan Bekas Ketua Menteri Melaka Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik Di Hotel Belmount, Melaka Pada 3hb November 1999 .
Saya tidak faham mengapa cucu saya hanya menyatakan sekarang tidak mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim bila
dia telah mengakui selama 5 tahun kebelakangan ini sejak 1994 bahawa dia mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim,
termasuk membuat keterangan bersumpah di mahkamah di depan tuan hakim

Cucu saya, Noryati binti Mohamad Yusop, telah membuat satu kenyataan pada 2hb November 1999 menafikan keterangan
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur pada 29hb Oktober 1999 bahawa dia mempunyai hubungan
sulit dengan bekas Ketua Menteri Melaka Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik pada tahun 1994.

Saya amat terkejut dengan kenyataan cucu saya ini kerana sepanjang 5 tahun ini, cucu saya telah mengakui mempunyai
hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim semasa cucu saya masih berumur 15 tahun. Cucu saya juga memberitahu ahli keluarga
dan saya bahawa Tan Sri Rahim merupakan orang lelaki pertama yang melakukan hubungan sulit dengannya.

Oleh kerana cucu terlibat dengan Tan Sri Rahim, dia ditahan oleh pihak polis pada akhir bulan Ogos 1994 sehingga saya
sebagai nenek yang membesarkannya tidak dapat berjumpa dengannya. Saya hairan mengapa pihak polis dan kerajaan BN
boleh membenarkan seorang mangsa rogol ditahan sedangkan mereka yang merogolnya bebas tanpa dipenjarakan. Ini boleh
dilihat selepas 14 lelaki, kecuali Tan Sri Rahim, mengakui merogol gadis bawah umur di mahkamah tetapi tidak dipenjarakan
sebaliknya dibebaskan. Akibat peristiwa hitam itu, cucu saya telah melahirkan seorang anak perempuan pada 1995.

Oleh kerana tidak dapat menjumpai cucu saya, saya telah meminta bantuan daripada Ahli Parlimen Kawasan Kota Melaka YB
Lim Guan Eng yang berjaya memaksa pihak polis membenarkan saya melawat cucu saya. Saya amat kesal dan sedih bahawa
YB Lim dalam usaha membantu mendapat keadilan untuk cucu saya telahpun dipenjarakan di Penjara Kajang pada 25hb Ogos
1998 dan kehilangan statusnya sebagai Ahli Parlimen.

Dalam kes mahkamah Lim Guan Eng yang mulai pada 20hb Jun 1995, Ketua Jabatan Siasatan Jenayah Mok Siew Hoong
menyatakan bahawa cucu saya telah mengakui mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim. Pada 27hb Februari 1997,
cucu saya pula memberikan keterangan sebagai seorang saksi kepada hakim Mahkamah Tinggi dalam kes YB Lim Guan Eng
bahawa Tan Sri Rahim mempunyai hubungan sulit dengannya.

Selepas itu cucu saya, semasa berjumpa dengan saya, masih mengakui bahawa Tan Sri Rahim ada hubungan sulit dengannya.
Malah, cucu saya telah membuat satu ucapan di depan kami di Hotel Federal, Kuala Lumpur pada 27hb Januari 1999
menyokong YB Lim Guan Eng yang dipenjarakan seperti berikut:-

"Saya merasa sungguh kesal atas apa yang telah berlaku di masa lampau, dan merasa sungguh sedih sekali kerana YB Lim
Guan Eng kini telah dipenjarakan. Apa yang beliau cuba lakukan hanyalah untuk membantu saya. Tetapi beliau sendiri pula
menjadi mangsa. Semua ini sungguh tidak adil. Saya berdoa semoga keadilan akan dikembalikan kepada YB.
Malam ini, saya telah membawa dua surat rayuan, satu kepada Yang Di Pertuan Agong dan satu lagi kepada Yang Di Pertua
Negeri Melaka, meminta supaya YB Lim Guan Eng diampunkan dan dibebaskan segera supaya meneruskan tanggungjawab
sebagai seorang Ahli Parlimen sejati Malaysia. Saya meminta supaya YB Lim Kit Siang selaku Ketua Pembangkang Parlimen
boleh membantu sampaikan surat-surat rayuan saya ini kepada kedua-dua pihak itu."

Saya tidak faham mengapa cucu saya hanya menyatakan sekarang tidak mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim bila
dia telah mengakui selama 5 tahun kebelakangan ini sejak 1994 bahawa dia mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim,
termasuk membuat keterangan bersumpah di mahkamah di depan tuan hakim.

Saya berasa hampa, malu dan marah atas kejadian rogol yang menimpa cucu saya. Tetapi saya berasa lebih hampa, malu dan
marah bila cucu saya boleh membelakangkan kebenaran dan keadilan dengan melupai jasa baik YB Lim sehingga bersedia
bohong dengan menafikan dia mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim. Nyata sekali, ini adalah satu lagi konspirasi
kerajaan BN menutup kebenaran demi kepentingan politik.

Saya masih mengingati cucu saya begitu tersiksa semasa ditahan di Pusat Pemulihan Rembau sehingga cuba melarikan diri
banyak kali. Dia memberikan keterangan di mahkamah bahawa dia berjaya melarikan diri daripada tahanan sekali sebelum
ditangkap balik. Jelas, kasih sayang keluarga kami kepadanya tidak dibalas.

Apa yang dilakukan oleh cucu saya adalah tidak adil kepada YB Lim Guan Eng yang telah kehilangan begitu banyak, termasuk
dipenjarakan kerana cuba mempertahankan hak cucu saya ini. Saya tidak boleh lupa betapa susah anak-anak dan isterinya
yang sering menangis merindui bapa mereka semasa dipenjara. Oleh itu, saya ingin meminta maaf kepada YB Lim atas apa
yang cucu saya telah lakukan.

Saya juga berhasrat memberikan jaminan kepada YB Lim bahawa keluarga kami sentiasa mengenang pengorbanan beliau dan
mengingati kesediaan beliau menanggung segala penderitaan dan kerugian kewangan demi membantu sebuah keluarga Melayu
miskin yang dianiayai oleh kezaliman kerajaan BN. Kami tidak akan lupai YB Lim adalah satu-satunya orang yang bersedia
menegakkan keadilan untuk kami bila tidak ada seorang pun yang berani tolong sama kami.

Semoga Allah S.A.W. boleh memaafkan cucu saya.

Pendek binti Ahmad
Sabri bin Mohamad Yasin
Alamat: Batu 13, Kampung Sungai Petai, 78000 Alor Gajah, Melaka .

* Sabri challenges Rahim to swear in the holiest mosque in Melaka that he did not have sex with the girl.
*Guan Eng commented that he felt disgusted at what had happened.

MAT PENANG

KEZALIMAN TERHADAP PUAN PENDEK AHMAD
Hari ini saya terbaca kisah puan Pendek Ahmad di dalam Majalah Muslimah keluaran terbaru (Disember98).Kisah cucu puan Pendek Ahmad yang dikatakan dirogol oleh seorang yang ternama beberapa tahun yang lalu di Melaka. Majalah Muslimah telah mengadakan satu temubual dengan puan Pendek Ahmad pada bulan lepas. Beberapa perkara menarik telah didedahkan oleh puan Pendek Ahmad.
Puan Pendek dilaporkan berkata:

'Satelah berita ini tersebar melibatkan ahli politik negara, Perdana Menteri sendiri telah berjumpa cucu mak cik.Cucu mak cik telah menceritakan segala-galanya perbuatan tertuduh, tetapi langsung tidak mendapat perhatian Perdana Menteri. Akhirnya, dia (orang ternama)tidak didakwa sedangkan cucu mak cik ditahan di Pusat Tahanan seri Puteri, Rembau.Semasa kes dibicarakan, beliau dikatakan mempunyai rekod bersih sedangkan cucu mak cik pula dikenakan tuduhan baru. Seramai 14 orang lelaki telah dibicarakan dimahkamah dan mengatakan mempunyai hubungan seks dengan cucu mak cik. Mak cik ingin membuat pembetulan, disini dia (gadis) sekali lagi menjadi mangsa.Dia sendiri tidak kenal kesemua lelaki itu. Mak cik membuat andaian mereka semua diupah.'

YAB PM sendiri membuat siasatan dan beliau sendiri tidak berusaha untuk membela saorang rakyat yang telah dianiaya. Bukan setakat itu malah telah membuat satu konpirasi untuk membersehkan nama perogol ternama itu. Saya hairan dengan dengan ucapan ucapan nya seolah-olah satu perjuang bangsa yang unggul tetapi sebenarnya saorang yang begitu zalim.

Kepada penyokong YAB PM saya berharap semoga mendapat kesedaran. Kezaliman ini mestilah ditamatkan. Pemerintahan yang adil dan dapat membela rakyat yang daif dan lemah adalah kemahuan semua rakyat .Marilah kita semua bersatu menolak pemimpin saperti YAB DS Dr Mahathir.

Kepada SB-SB yang berada dalam gerak-net ini saya ingin memberitahu bahawa suami puan Pendek Ahmad adalah bekas polis pencen.Kezaliman ini mungkin akan menimpa kamu juga pada satu hari nanti kalau kita tidak berjaya menyekatnya sekarang. Masa untuk perubahan adalah sekarang.

Diakhir puan Pendek Ahmad dilapurkan berkata:

'Mak cik lihat semua ini sebagai ujian dan takdir yang menimpa keluarga kami.Doa mak cik, biarkanlah. Ini masa mereka. Mak cik sering berdoa semoga Allah menurunkan balasan kepada mereka yang menganiaya kami sekeluarga.'

Mari kita semua berdoa bersama mak cik Pendek Ahmad dan juga kita berusaha menyekat kezaliman ini daripada terus menjadi barah dalam negara yang tercinta ini.

Wassalam.

Abu Talib Khan.

NORYATI Mohamad Yusop bersama suaminya Sulaiman Mohd. Ali di sidang akhbar di Melaka semalam. - Gambar ABDUL MOES MOHAMED YUSUF
Hubungan sulit dengan Rahim bohong - Noryati
MELAKA 2 Nov. - Seorang wanita yang pernah dikaitkan mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan bekas Ketua Menteri Melaka, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik, pada 1994 hari ini mendedahkan bagaimana dia diajar dan dipaksa bercakap bohong kepada Perdana Menteri dan pihak polis.

Noryati Mohamad Yusop, 21, turut mendakwa seorang guru disiplin sekolahnya dan seorang doktor mengajarnya supaya mereka-reka cerita konon dirinya mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Rahim sebelum dibawa bertemu Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad.

''Saya ingin menyatakan bahawa saya tidak pernah mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Tan Sri Rahim pada bila-bila masa jua,'' kata Noryati ketika membacakan Akuan Berkanun pada sidang akhbar di sini hari ini.

Akuan Berkanun itu bertarikh 2 September 1998 dibuat di hadapan Pesuruhjaya Sumpah Chong Yong Mok di Melaka. Turut hadir pada sidang akhbar itu ialah suaminya, Sulaiman Mohd. Ali.

Menurut Noryati, dia membuat pendedahan itu bagi menjelaskan kedudukan dirinya yang telah disentuh secara terbuka oleh bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, dalam perbicaraan di Mahkamah Tinggi, Kuala Lumpur yang kini sedang berjalan.

Jumaat lepas, Anwar dalam keterangan bela diri menyatakan dia (Anwar) telah dimaklumkan oleh Perdana Menteri kononnya seorang gadis mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Rahim yang merujuk kepada dirinya (Noryati).

''Kenyataan tersebut tidak benar dan saya tampil hari ini untuk menyatakan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku kepada diri saya tanpa ditekan, diancam, dipujuk atau disuruh oleh mana-mana pihak,'' katanya.

Noryati yang kini bekerja di sebuah kilang di Alor Gajah juga mendedahkan bahawa dia diculik dari Melaka dan disimpan selama dua minggu di Kuala Lumpur.

Dalam Akuan Berkanun itu, Noryati menjelaskan dia pernah bertemu Rahim semasa menjadi Ketua Menteri Melaka untuk menerima bantuan wang pelajarannya.

''Semasa bersekolah di Melaka, seorang guru disiplin sekolah yang bernama Cikgu Zainal pada mulanya memaklumkan kepada saya untuk menukarkan saya ke sekolah Sri Putri Wilayah,'' katanya.

Menurutnya, dua minggu sebelum bertukar ke sekolah itu, Zainal menyuruhnya mengikutnya (Zainal) ke Kuala Lumpur untuk berjumpa kawannya.

Semasa di dalam kereta, kata Noryati, Zainal juga bertanya sama ada dia mengenali Ibrahim Jendol (bekas Ketua Pemuda Alor Gajah).

Semasa sampai di Kuala Lumpur, dia kemudian dibawa berjumpa Dr. Maamor di sebuah klinik di Jalan Ampang dan tinggal di klinik berkenaan selama dua minggu.

Dalam tempoh itu, dakwa Noryati, Zainal dan Dr. Maamor mengajarnya tentang cerita konon dia (Noryati) ada mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Rahim.

Selepas itu, katanya, dia dibawa berjumpa Perdana Menteri dan ketika pertemuan itu terdapat empat orang lagi yang dia tidak kenal.

''Zainal berkata bahawa saya telah mengadu kepadanya bahawa saya ada hubungan dengan Abdul Rahim dan selepas itu Zainal memandang saya dan saya mengiakannya dan menganggukkan kepala,'' katanya.

Perdana Menteri ketika itu hanya berdiam diri dan mendengar apa yang dinyatakan kepada beliau tetapi selepas itu meminta mereka yang berada di dalam pejabatnya menyiasat dengan betul dakwaan berkenaan.

Semasa dibawa ke Bukit Aman, kata Noryati, Zainal memaksanya membuat laporan mengenai hubungan sulit dengan Rahim.

''Saya tinggal kira-kira 50 hari di Bukit Aman dan dalam masa itu telah disoal oleh seorang pegawai polis, Deputi Supritendan (DSP) Chong,'' katanya.

Menurut Noryati, Zainal dan Dr. Maamor yang menyuruhnya mereka-rekakan cerita bahawa dia mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Rahim.

''Mereka berdua mengajar saya apa yang perlu dikatakan semasa berada di klinik Dr. Maamor dan menyuruh saya mengaku saya ada hubungan sulit dengan Rahim, " katanya.

''Kenyataan itu diambil oleh DSP Chong dan saya tahu kenyataan saya itu adalah fitnah,'' ujar Noryati.

Sebelum itu, menurut Noryati, Zainal memberitahunya, beliau (Zainal) juga memberi kenyataan kepada DSP Chong tetapi tidak menunjukkan kenyataan itu kepadanya (Noryati).

Bagaimanapun kata Noryati, semasa DSP Chong menyoalnya, dia merujuk kepada satu kenyataan dan pegawai polis itu juga memintanya mengaku sahaja dia mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Rahim.

''DSP Chong menggunakan kenyataan dari cikgu saya untuk menyoal saya dan lepas itu dia suruh saya menandatangani kenyataan yang saya tidak baca,'' katanya.

Menurut Noryati lagi, semasa berada di Bukit Aman, dia juga memberitahu bapa, nenek dan kakaknya yang melawatnya bahawa ada orang memaksanya membuat pengakuan mengenai hubungan sulitnya dengan Rahim.

Katanya, neneknya Pendek Ahmad bagaimanapun tidak percaya dengan penjelasannya itu.

Noryati juga menjelaskan semasa berada di Bukit Aman, dia berjumpa Dr. Abdul Rahman yang turut bertanyakan mengenai hubungannya dengan Rahim.

''Dia kata, kalau betul, dia mahu periksa saya. Saya kata saya ada perhubungan dengan Tan Sri dan dia kemudian bertanya terdapat apa-apa tanda yang ada pada badan Rahim,'' ujarnya.

Kata Noryati, dia kemudian hanya mereka-reka sahaja sedangkan dia tidak tahu perkara itu.

DSP Chong juga bertanyakan mengenai tanda-tanda pada badan Rahim dan sebelum itu Cikgu Zainal menyuruhnya menyebut tanda-tanda pada badan Rahim yang boleh dipercayai semasa mereka berada di klinik.

Semasa ditahan di pusat pemulihan akhlak Taman Seri Puteri di Rembau, kata Noryati, dia juga memberitahu neneknya bahawa Zainal memaksanya memfitnah Rahim.

Katanya, Noryati dalam pengakuan itu menyatakan dia pernah membuat surat pengakuan menafikan perhubungan sulit dengan Rahim sebelum ini kerana merasakan dirinya berada dalam keadaan serba salah.

''Tidak ada orang yang memaksa saya membuat pengakuan itu semasa saya berada di Taman Seri Puteri dan kandungan surat itu ditulis oleh saya dengan bantuan kakak,'' katanya.

Semasa perbicaraan Lim Guan Eng yang menghadapi tuduhan hasutan di Mahkamah Tinggi Melaka, kata Noryati, peguam Lim, Karpal Singh bertanya sama ada dia telah membuat kenyataan kepada polis mengenai perhubungan sulit dengan Rahim.

Ujarnya, dia menjawab "ya" semasa disoal oleh Karpal tetapi Karpal tidak bertanya soalan lain selepas itu.

Selepas memberi keterangan di mahkamah, kata Noryati, dia kemudian membuat kenyataan akhbar bahawa tuduhan kononnya dia mempunyai hubungan sulit dengan Rahim adalah tidak benar.

''Saya membuat surat akuan ini dengan kepercayaan bahawa apa-apa yang tersebut di dalamnya adalah benar serta menurut Akta Berkanun 1960,'' katanya.

Oleh: SOPHA SULAIMAN

Malaysian Dream from Kajang Prison
by Lim Guan Eng

(January 12, 1999) Malaysian opposition politican Lim Guan Eng was convicted last April of sedition for criticizing the way Malaysian judiciary officials handled a rape case. Lim was arrested in 1995 for promoting “disaffection with the administration of justice in Malaysia.” He had questioned the government’s decision not to press statutory rape charges against a Malaysian politician for having sex with a 15-year-old girl while holding the girl in protective custody for three years. (For more information about Lim’s case, read DFN’s analysis, Malaysian reformers.)

Lim’s imprisonment shows the great lengths to which Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed’s government will go to silence opposition. Anwar Ibrahim, former deputy prime minister and now an outspoken critic of Mahathir, faces sex and corruption charges; Anwar says the charges were trumped up to silence him.

On his 38th birthday, Lim released a letter from prison. This letter, published below, describes ten freedoms that he believes Malaysia needs for democracy. These freedoms include “freedom from inequality… and…selective prosecutions,” “freedom of religion,” and “freedom of telecommunications.” Lim Guan Eng will probably have to wait some time before he can enjoy these freedoms; his latest appeals to overturn his conviction have failed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These last 108 days have been a most trying and difficult period for me. The enforced separation from my family and loved ones has been as painful for them as it is for me. The loss of personal freedom is equally devastating.

But the physical, emotional and mental sufferings I had to endure was quite unexpected. It has been said that the greatness of a nation is measured not by how well the rich lives but how the poor, down-trodden and oppressed are treated in the slums and prisons. If we use such a yardstick, then Malaysia clearly does not come out very well.

Only prayers, the support and love of my family, the solidarity of Malaysians who demonstrated their love for truth, justice and fair play by signing the signature petition seeking my pardon, have sustained me throughout these challenging times.

It is soul-destroying for a man to be thrown into prison and treated like a common criminal for a crime he did not commit nor even considered as constituting a crime. Only my abiding and unshaken faith that I had tried to do right, correct injustice and uphold the truth enabled me to maintain a sense balance and proportion to face all the daily rigours, indignities and humiliations of prison life as a common criminal.

Regardless of what the courts said, I believe I am no criminal when all I did was try to held Puan Pendek binti Ahmad, a poor old and illiterate lady to seek justice for her granddaughter. I harmed no one when I questioned why the police detained the statutory rape victim but not her rapists.

I know I harmed no one when I questioned the Attorney-General why this rape victim, who as an underaged girl was treated like an offender with her sexual background publicly exposed and her reputation sullied.

I know I harmed no one when I questioned why her rapists were not sentenced to a single day’s jail for rape when they had pleaded guilty to statutory rape.

I know I harmed no one when I demanded that women’s rights be respected, not violated, so that rape victims are protected instead of being punished and rapists imprisoned instead of being set free.

I harmed no one when I criticised the Attorney-General and the police for only prosecuting 14 men (who were merely bound over by the court after pleading guilty) but not a senior politician, when the girl had admitted to the police that all of them had had sex with her.

Perhaps, the only persons I harmed were the girl’s rapists. The irony is that all the rapists need not spend a single day in prison whilst the girl was detained for almost three years and I am sentenced to three years’ jail.

Is this the type of Malaysian justice that the Prime Minister, the Attorney-General and the police are proud of? How then can our sisters and daughters be safe?

But then again, as a Member of Parliament, I should have known that the greatest harm I have caused is political in nature. Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik was forced to resign as UMNO [United Malay National Organization, Malaysia’s ruling political party] Youth President and Melaka Chief Minister because of his alleged involvement in this sex scandal. [The 15-year-old girl confessed to having sex with Rahim.]

Rahim’s resignation is a political fact that is accepted, even welcomed, by all Malaysians except the Prime Minister, which perhaps explain why I am in Kajang prison.

The central issue is still justice or rather the lack of it, where the rape victim and the MP [member of Parliament] who expresses it are both detained and imprisoned whilst the rapists get away scot-free.

The rape victim does not understand this type of justice. Her grandmother does not understand either. Neither do I. Nor 20 other million ordinary Malaysians .

Only the Prime Minister, the Attorney-General, the police and the rapists understand such perversion of justice. That is why I do not have confidence that I will be successful in my application for a full pardon from the King as the Pardons Board comprises the Prime Minister, whose advice the King must accept.

Even though I will likely be disqualified as MP with loss of all financial benefits and my political career terminated, I have the satisfaction of knowing that I tried to fulfil my role as a MP to the best of my ability.

If my imprisonment is necessary to prevent such perversion of justice, where the rape victim is punished, whilst the rapists are unpunished, from occurring again then I have done my duty. I have no regrets and my conscience is clear.

This knowledge allows me to sleep tranquilly at night, even in prison. And dream dreams. Dreams of a better Malaysia. A social democratic Malaysia founded upon ten essential freedoms:

No Rights Without Responsibilities, No Authority Without Democracy
One, the freedom of full and effective participation in democracy. Such freedom must be on a continuous basis by all Malaysians towards creating a healthy, meaningful and functioning democratic culture. Just as democracy is not just limited to the holding of elections, Malaysians must exercise their rights to be fully involved in decision making leading to:

No Justice Without Equality
Two, freedom from inequality is most relevant in demanding justice in administering our laws. Selective prosecutions and double-standards between the rich and poor or based on political considerations makes a mockery of the concept of equality before the law.

No Allocations Without Accountability
Three, freedom from corruption is essential to economic prosperity, productivity and financial well-being. Cronyism, nepotism and money politics must end.

No Humanity Without Respect
Four, freedom from fear is necessary to protect, promote and preserve basic human rights and prevent abuses by an oppressive and repressive government.

No Prosperity Without Equity
Five, freedom from want is vital to ensure that all can enjoy economic wealth — that in pursuing economic prosperity, we must not forget existing social inequities and the poor especially poverty, malnutrition, illiteracy and economic imbalances.

No Unity Without Diversity
Six, freedom of religious belief is a recognition of our cultural and religious diversity that makes up our Malaysian nation. Such recognition is a prerequisite in attaining national unity in our multi-racial society based on tolerance and mutual respect.

No Excellence Without Opportunity
Seven, freedom of opportunity must be given to every Malaysian to realise his or her full potential. Our human resources must be given every opportunity to develop to enable Malaysia to compete internationally. To ensure equal opportunity, groups that were disadvantaged historically must first be assisted to allow them to compete equally with other groups.

No IT Without Full Accessibility
Eight, freedom of telecommunications realises the importance of IT to the economic survival and prosperity of Malaysia in the New Millennium. Unless we are IT adept, we will not succeed in becoming a developed country and we will be economically marginalised. For IT to be fully inculcated, the press must be free and telecommunications freely and fully accessible.

No Stability Without Family
Nine, the freedom to preserve and promote family values and social order is crucial to a stable, prosperous, moral and democratic society. Despite the great diversity in our various cultures, there is unity in diversity. Our multi-cultural races have many commonalities such as importance of nation above self, family unit, consultation and consensus, thrift, hard work, respect for learning and adherence to religious values.

No Well-Being Without Nature
Ten, the freedom from environmental degradation emphasizes the right to a clean, healthy, natural and quality life. No amount of wealth can purchase health. Similarly no amount of prosperity can create a sense of well-being if the air we breathe and the water we drink is foul and dirty. We must not only reduce pollutions but preserve and protect the great natural heritage given by God.

We are born free. When we are allowed to enjoying our freedoms given to us by our Creator and in accordance with universally-shared moral values and free to develop our full potential, we can not only live with honour and dignity but contribute towards a progressive society.

Malaysians are born free and thus have a right to enjoy these ten essential freedoms. It is our inalienable right.

To those who wish to deny Malaysians these ten essential freedoms, deserve it not for themselves.

These may be the dreams of one prisoner in Kajang Prison, but they can also be the dreams of all Malaysians who cherish their rights, know their responsibilities and understand their obligations. And most importantly, want to restore our rights as the rulers of Malaysia, not the servants of those who rule over us.

Democracy is government of the people, by the people and for the people, and not government over the people.

The firm basis of government is justice, truth and reason, not tyranny. We seek to restore these values, not destroy our institutions. Let us begin to firmly restore these values into our institutions—Parliament, the judiciary, executive and the press—by peaceful and democratic means.

This is the cause we should undertake for Malaysia.

I wish to thank all my supporters who have first stood by me when I was first charged in 1995 and continued to stand by me even after I was imprisoned. I hope that when I am reunited with my family, we can also reunite in this cause of ours to make a Malaysia in the new millennium founded on these ten essential freedoms. To realise our dream of a Malaysia owned by all Malaysians that is free, just and democratic.

Lim Guan Eng
MP for Kota Melaka
8 December 1998