IATROGENOCIDE: AN AMBULANCE RIDE TO HELL

by John Lee

"Every murderer is probably somebody's old friend."
—Agatha Christie

At any rate, Dr. Frederic Mailliez publicly admitted, "I thought this woman had a chance." said, who coincidentally arrived at the crash scene while driving back from a party, chauffeuring an American friend.

French trauma doctor: "What are the police trying to hide, anyway? There is a blackout over everything in this thing…. The treatment Diana was given is typical of what is done with John Doe or Jack Smith… and are, virtually, allowed to die by benefiting from the incompetence and inefficiency which is typical of the SAMU [ambulance service]…. [T]ime is of the essence. You have got to get the person onto an operating block to start suturing. They can be saved, but you must respect the statistical time curves…. I would have taken her within a quarter of an hour to Val de Grace, which is much closer than La Pitie. That is a military hospital. Every political figure who is in a car crash or is injured is taken there…. I might have helicoptered her in…. This woman was one of the world's most powerful and influential people. She would normally have been given top treatment. She was not. Instead, she was treated like Doe and Smith, when Doe and Smith are [unlucky]. And you can do me a favor! Make a stink out of this, because it shows you just how bad things are for John Doe and Jack Smith…. As soon as that lady witness called police at 12:26, every ambulance in Paris… heard the call…. And believe me, it didn't take long before everyone knew who was in the crash. For the SAMU ambulances to take between 12 and 14 minutes to arrive is unbelievable. In that area, and at that time of night, it should not have taken more than 5 minutes. And time is of the essence."

1873 Print: Death Warrant of Mary Stuart. Engraved image from The Aldine, titled "Death Warrant of Mary Stuart." Based on a painting by Wehle.

Diana's jewelry disappeared; some of it reappeared later in the police station. Her $200,000 engagement ring, which Dodi had first given her that evening that evening during his marriage proposal, miraculously reappeared in Dodi's home days later. The victims' bodies, both dead and alive, were being violated at the scene of the crime. Despite the paparazzi photographers snapping photos of the crash victims with giant cameras pressed inches from their bleeding faces, and the gathering crowd all yelling that the victim's name was Princess Diana, this doctor claimed he did not realize who his patient was, and so he did not bother to ride with her to the hospital.

Police reconstruction drawings of the hit-and-run collision have disappeared.

The chauffeur only had two drinks, several hours before the crash. His blood-alcohol may very well have actually been 0.00% BAC. A witness at the hotel said that "he was looking quite normal," just minutes before the fateful drive. As mentioned previously, blood-alcohol tests are NOT accurate when the victim suffers internal injuries. Strict chain-of-custody must be adhered to for such evidence to be admissible in court.

Why did government surveillance cameras in that part of Paris never record Dodi and Diana's car? Why were 17 government radar cameras for ticketing speeders turned off and out of film—despite other citizens being photographed and ticketed for speeding at the same time?

If the chauffeur was actually speeding to escape a dozen paparazzi chasing the "limosine," why was he not ticketed for speeding? Why were the dozen paparazzi not ticketed for speeding? Isn't that considered "drag racing" which would be subject to arrest and very profitable prosecution for the government? Today, British citizens go to prison for 3 months for speeding. Surely this was more serious since a deadly crash resulted.

An intimate cellular phone call of Diana's had been intercepted by British intelligence and broadcast all over the world, revealing her adultery while the princess was still married to Prince Charles. Monarchists called for public beheadings of her lovers. (Much like American right-wing government hypocrites call for public beheadings of drug dealers and the shooting of casual drug users.)

Diana believed British intelligence was following her, and that she was being targeted. "One day I will go up in a helicopter and I won't come down," she confided in her billionaire father-in-law-to-be.

Chauffeur Henri Paul was paid $200,000 by MI6, Her Majesty's Secret Service (the equivalent of our CIA), according to MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson (a former member of 23 SAS special forces 1 2 3 4 5). Tomlinson had been fired and later imprisoned as censorship for attempting to publish a book in violation of The Official Secrets Act. According to Tomlinson, laser flashguns are designed to be used to blind a driver during an assassination attempt, hopefully causing a fatal crash. Such a "deniable" assassination had been planned by British "intelligence" (i.e., covert operations) against the president of Serbia in 1992 during the Bosnian civil war, according to the secret agent. The whistleblowing Tomlinson testified under oath to French judge Herve Stephan, who is heading the court's investigation into the crash. Diana's other bodyguard that night was also a "contact" for British intelligence agencies.

When Tomlinson attempted to travel to the USA for an NBC television interview, U.S. customs agents handcuffed him to a chair for seven hours and deported him from America, effectively censoring this interview (Star, June 1, 1999).

Diana believed British intelligence murdered her favorite bodyguard, a London police officer, in a rare police motorcycle crash. Her husband, Prince Charles, had coldly informed her of the killing of her lover as they drove to a royal function: "By the way, your friend is dead."

French police investigators believe the Mercedes may have had problems with its brakes, and that the airbags may have deployed before crash impact, blinding the driver and knocking his hands from the steering wheel. The investigation specifically looked into the possibility of booby trapping of the car's electrical system and computers. Coincidentally, this same car had been stolen and when it was later found, its computer-controlled airbag and ABS braking systems had been removed. New airbag and ABS systems had been installed just prior to the fatal crash. Skid marks totaling 166 feet revealed that the ABS system has locked up, pulling the car towards the concrete pillars. Supposedly, it is impossible to leave skid marks with ABS. Especially not for 166 feet.

"One of the world's leading magazines Executive Intelligence Review is supporting my campaign to shed light on the truth surrounding the crash."
—Mohamed Al Fayed

Al Fayed Charges 'Murder' in Anniversary Lawsuit

By Jeffrey Steinberg
Executive Intelligence Review
September 29, 2000
Reposted by ALFAYED.COM

Exactly three years after the Aug. 31, 1997 Paris car crash, that claimed the lives of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, and Henri Paul, Mohamed Al Fayed, father of Dodi Fayed, filed a Federal civil suit in Washington, D.C., demanding that the U.S. government turn over all classified documentation that could shed light on the causes of that tragic event.

The suit also demanded government files on jailed fraudster and self-proclaimed "CIA agent" Oswald Le Winter, and others, who were foiled in a 1998 effort to extort $20 million from Al Fayed. U.S. Justice Department officials have stone-walled for two and a half years, in bringing charges against the other Americans involved in the scheme, despite the fact that Le Winter is now serving a four-year jail sentence in Austria for his role in the conspiracy. The incident revolved around Le Winter et al's attempts to sell Al Fayed forged CIA documents, purporting to prove that Britain's MI6 intelligence agency assassinated Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed. To this day, Le Winter claims that, although the documents seized in his hotel in Vienna are forgeries, their content is accurate, and reflects the contents of actual CIA documents.

Smears and Cover-Up Can't Stop Al Fayed

Despite a flagrant cover-up of the causes of the Paris crash by French authorities, and a non-stop smear campaign against him by the British Crown and the majority of the British Establishment media, Mohamed Al Fayed has continued to insist that the deaths of his son, the Princess, and their driver, were murder. In a videotaped statement released at a Washington press conference on Aug. 30, 2000 announcing the lawsuit, Al Fayed stated:

"Three years ago, on Aug. 31, 1997, I lost my beloved son Dodi and a dear friend, Diana, Princess of Wales, in a tragic event in Paris, France. The car crash that took the lives of these two lovely people has been portrayed as a traffic accident caused by a drunk, driving at high speed. The reality is that it was murder."

And, three years after the fact, a growing mountain of evidence, now, more than ever, supports Al Fayed's contentions.

Despite British Establishment efforts to demonize the Harrods department store owner as a "conspiracy-mounger," and to bury the truth of the Paris crash beneath a "bodyguard of lies" and a rigorously enforced media blackout, the press conference drew national and international media attention and once again spotlighted the many unanswered questions surrounding the crash in the Place de l'Alma tunnel.

Washington attorney Mark Zaid, Harrods security director John Macnamara, and English barrister Ian Burton, who represents Al Fayed, spent more than an hour detailing the case for a de novo investigation into the Paris events, demanding that the U.S. agencies named in the lawsuit, make their classified files available, to ensure that justice is done and the truth made public. The press conference was attended by an overflow crowd of reporters and other interested parties.

For the next 48 hours, major U.S. news outlets featured coverage of the Al Fayed allegations. John Macnamara and Mark Zaid, appearing on a variety of news interview shows, presented dramatic evidence that the French investigation was a cover-up, and that driver Henri Paul was not drunk at the time of the crash.

At the press conference, Macnamara, Zaid, and Burton released photographs from the surveillance cameras at the Paris Ritz Hotel, which Al Fayed also owns, showing two unidentified men, at the edge of a crowd of paparazzi in front of the hotel, in the hours just prior to the crash. Those two men, whose photographs first appeared, exclusively, on the cover EIR on Dec. 19, 1997, were part of a team of five to seven men, tracking Diana and Dodi, it is believed. Were they part of an MI6 surveillance unit, that, several well-placed sources say, was stalking the couple from the moment they arrived in paris? That was one of a string of questions posed by Macnamara and Zaid.

Participants in the press conference were also provided excerpts from video footage at the Ritz Hotel, showing acting hotel security chief Henri Paul, in the evening prior to the crash, which took place shortly after midnight. Although the official French investigation found that Paul was drunk, the video footage showed that Paul was perfectly normal, conversing with other security personnel, hotel guests, and the Princess and Dodi Fayed.

The official French coroner's files revealed that Henri Paul not only had illegal levels of alcohol and traces of two prescription drugs in his blood. There was also a 21% level of carbon monoxide in the same blood sample! Experts on carbon monoxide poisoning concur that a 21% presence of carbon monoxide would render any individual incapable of moving and, in fact, near death. The hotel video footage, and Paul's inability to navigate the Mercedes sedan through the Paris streets and riverside expressway, clearly demonstrated that he was not suffering from such lethal levels of carbon monoxide.

As Macnamara told the Washington press corps, the only conclusion that can be drawn, is that the blood samples were either so contaminated as to be useless, or that they were taken from some other person! In short, the whole foundation for the official French government claim that the crash was the result of drunk driving is disproven by the very evidence in the French magistrate's file.

A So-Called 'Suicide'

Macnamara elicited a sharp reaction from the Washington press corps when he detailed the mysterious death of paparazzo James Andanson, whose charred body was found in the wreckage of a car in the south of France in May of this year. French officials claimed that Andanson had committed suicide, because of marital troubles.

Andanson was not only one of the leading paparazzi who had stalked Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed during the final week of their lives, Andanson was, also, at the time of the Paris crash, the owner of a white Fiat Uno, French authorities acknowledged, from the outset of the probe, that the Mercedes carrying Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, Henri Paul, and bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, collided with a slow-moving white Fiat Uno at the entrance of the Place de l'Alma tunnel, and this contributed to the fatal crash.

A number of eyewitnesses told French investigators that they saw a white Fiat Uno flee the tunnel, seconds after the crash, and disappear into the night. Despite a nationwide dragnet, the French police claimed that they were never able to find the car, nor identify the driver.

However, the French authorities did, in fact, seize the white Fiat owned by Andanson, which he had painted and sold shortly after the crash. Forensic tests on the car confirmed that the paint and bumper scratches matched those on the Mercedes, strongly suggesting that Andanson's car had been involved in the crash. Yet, Andanson presented a paper-thin alibi, that he was not in Paris the night of the crash, and the authorities released the Fiat and took Andanson off their suspects list!

Andanson's death in May was followed, days later, by an armed burglary on the offices of the Paris photo service where he worked. Three armed men wearing ski masks shot a security guard and held employees hostage, while they ransacked the offices and confiscated what were believed to be computer files and cameras owned by Andanson. A source in Paris confirmed to EIR that the modus operandi of the burglars showed that they were working for French security services, and knew that they were in no danger of being caught.

These startling revelations, which also first appeared in EIR on July 7, 2000, added to the already-existing evidence that the official French decision to shut down the investigation, was a flagrant cover-up. The final one-page statement by investigating magistrate Herve Stephan exonerated all of the paparazzi and place exclusive blame on Henri Paul. Thus, by failing to indict any of the paparazzi for manslaughter, or even for failing to obey France's strict "good Samaritan" laws, which require that eyewitnesses to a crash assist the victims, the French government was able to withhold from the public the 60,000-page report.

It was as if the Warren Commission had issued its final report on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, but kept the 26 volumes of evidence under seal!

More Unanswered Questions

Apart from the mysterious death of Andanson, the French "bungling" of the probe of his white Fiat Uno, the British surveillance team at the Ritz Hotel, and the "carbon monoxide" paradox of the Paul blood sample, there are other unanswered questions that must be resolved before anyone can dismiss Al Fayed's charges of murder.

At the Washington press conference, and in several media appearances afterwards, Macnamara cited evidence, obtained by American investigative reporter Gerald Posner, that Paul was on the payroll of several security services: the French, the British, and, perhaps, the Israeli. Posner wrote in Talk magazine last year that two American intelligence officials in Paris had told him that Paul had spent the early evening of Aug. 30, 1997, meeting with his French intelligence "handler" and had been paid the equivalent of $2,500 in French francs, money that was found in his pocket after the crash, in which he died instantly.

Paul took a circuitous route from the Ritz to Dodi Fayed's Paris apartment, a route that ultimately led him into the Alma tunnel. Was Paul acting on instruction from his intelligence agency controllers, who may have, in effect, set him up for murder? The U.S. files being sought by Al Fayed may shed light on this, given Posner's own source accounts, and given that the National Security Agency has acknowledged that it has more than 1,000 pages of files on Princess Diana.

Another mystery surrounding the events of Aug. 31, 1997 concerns the failure of French emergency rescue teams to get Princess Diana to a hospital for nearly two hours after they arrived at the crash site. As Macnamara told the Washington press corps, Princess Diana was suffering from the same internal injuries as President Ronald Reagan, when he was shot in March 1981. President Reagan, already in his 70s, was rushed to the hospital and he survived, after surgery to repair a torn pulmonary artery.

Princess Diana was "treated" at the Alma tunnel for an hour, and then it took an additional 43 minutes to drive her, by ambulance, to the La Pitie Salpetriere hospital just five miles from the crash site! She died moments before she was brought into surgery.

French officials claimed that French emergency rescue procedures are different from those used in America, and that French emergency rescue vehicles are "mobile surgery units." However, a senior French doctor who designed the Paris emergency response system told EIR in 1997 that Diana should have been in surgery in a hospital with 25-30 minutes after the rescue crews arrived. Under such "standard procedures," especially for VIPs, Diana would have been alive today, the doctor opined.

The emergency response and the forensic investigation at the Alma tunnel was personally directed by Philippe Massoni, the police chief of Paris. Interior Minister Jean-Pierre Chevenement was at the hospital, in minute-to-minute contact with the teams at the tunnel, an hour before Diana arrived. What do these senior French officials know about the bungling of the rescue effort?

High-Level Politics

As EIR reported from day one, the death of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed was not a story of star-crossed lovers. Rather, it was an affair of state.

Princess Diana, from no later that 1990, was publicly challenging the authority of the House of Windsor first, in her collaboration with author Andrew Morton, and later in her November 1995 television appearance on BBC Panorama. In that two-hour interview, Princess Diana declared that Prince Charles was unqualified to serve as King. As a member of the Spencer family, which had descended from British royalty long before the Hanover/Windsors migrated from Germany. Princess Diana's political attacks on the Royals represented a very significant challenge to the authority of the British monarchy. Following her BBC appearance, Princess Diana was the target of a vile smear campaign by the Establishment media, which demanded, "Off with her head!" This was a year and a half before her relationship with Dodi Fayed began.

This declaration of war by Diana was not lost on the Royals particularly on Prince Philip, as noted in a chillingly ironic piece that appeared in the British media on the morning of the Princess's death. On Sunday, Aug. 31, 1997, the Mirror had written:

"At Balmoral next week, the Queen will preside over a meeting of The Way Ahead Group where the Windsors sit down with their senior advisers and discuss policy matters. MI6 has prepared a special report on the Egyptian-born Fayeds which will be presented to the meeting. "A friend of the Royals said yesterday: 'Prince Philip has let rip several times recently about the Fayeds. He's been banging on about his contempt for Dodi and how he is undesirable as a future stepfather to William and Harry.' Diana has been told in no uncertain terms about the consequences should she continue the relationship with the Fayed boy. Now the Royal Family may have decided it is time to settle up."

Moments before that edition of the Sunday Mirror appeared on newsstands all across Great Britain, Princess Diana was pronounced dead.

See also:

Executive Intelligence Review. List of MI6 Agents, 1999-05-14. On May 12, 1999, British officials issued a "D-notice" gagging order to prevent the press from reporting the contents of a list that they said former MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson had posted on the Internet. Tomlinson's Swiss and American Internet service providers closed his sites at Britain's request. News accounts hyped the story. Now Internet surfers were getting interested, and thousands of people were looking for "The List." Enough people already had it, so that it proved impossible to stuff the cyber genie back into the bottle. LaRouche's people published the list in their flagship EIR, which was already on its way to the post office. Newspapers around the world ran alarmist quotations from British officials, but not everyone was taken in. Of the 116 names, 16 had been published in 1989, and 8 of these spies had accepted additional foreign assignments subsequent to their initial exposure. Not only have there never been instances of MI6 agents harmed due to exposure, but the agents themselves are apparently unconcerned (they probably enjoy the attention). This MI6 hoopla had more to do with protecting unaccountability in high places than with protecting spies. Fewer secrets mean more accountability to the citizens of the world, and this is what worries British officials as they consider new measures to regulate the Internet.

From Hell: Masonic Ritual Murders AKA Jack the Ripper

By Uri Dowbenko

"Jack the Ripper is a misnomer," writes Stephen Knight beginning his landmark book, "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution." "The name conjures up visions of a lone assassin, stalking his victims under the foggy gaslight of Whitechapel. It is just this mistaken notion, inspired almost solely by that terrifying nickname, which rendered the murders of five East End prostitutes in 1888 insoluble. For Jack the Ripper was not one man, but three, two killers and an accomplice. The facts surrounding their exploits have never before been teased from the confused skeins of truths, half-truths and lies which have been woven around this case."

Likewise, the film "From Hell," partially based on Knight's book, is a horror movie and occult thriller-murder mystery, directed by Albert and Allen Hughes ("Menace II Society", "Dead Presidents") and written by Terry Hayes and Rafael Yglesias.

Based on the graphic novel of the same name by Alan Moore and Eddie Campbell, "From Hell" is a richly sculpted, fictionalized version of the suppressed history of England - how a cabal of Freemasons orchestrated the so-called "Jack the Ripper" murders.

In the movie, Inspector Fred Abberline (Johnny Depp) tries to make sense of the serial murders in a lower-class London ghetto plagued by poverty and violence. When he's not on the job, Abberline tries to deal with the death of his wife by soaking his sorrows in absinthe and opium. Chasing the dragon, he's stoned again, when he sees the grisly murders through his astral vision -- a drug-induced psychic journey through the netherworld.

Tracking him down to an opium den, his obese sidekick Peter Godley (Robbie Coltrane) brings him back to consensus reality with a well-placed bitch slap.

Meanwhile, Mary Kelly (Heather Graham) and her hooker friends are being extorted by a gang of thugs.

Abberline follows the clues, leading him to a conspiracy at the highest levels of Government and Freemasonry -- Sir William Gull (Ian Holm), the Queen's physician, and Sir Charles Warren (Ian Richardson), Commissioner of Police and member of the Ars Quator Coronatorum Masonic Lodge -- confidants to Queen Victoria herself.

A gripping, well-styled movie, "From Hell" is a bold revision of history based on Knight's ground-breaking research.

Historically, this cabal of high-level Masons was determined to "protect" the Monarchy - and preserve their own control of the Government.

After all, conspiracies of States are always informative because of the depths of depravity that show what men will do to preserve the status quo of the Ruling Class and Power Elite. In this case, the movie deftly illustrates that xenophobia and unvarnished hypocrisy are the hallmarks of the outwardly prim and proper Victorian Age. The flood of immigrants. The rising tide of socialism. The perceived threat of Catholicism to the Crown. The possibility of working-class uprising. These were all political factors in an age when the debauchery of the Ruling Class was a fact of life, as were the ruthlessness and corruption of the Crown.

"A great deal is at stake if the Establishment considers it necessary to operate a full scale cover-up," writes Knight. "For the truth of the Jack the Ripper affair to have been painstakingly concealed can mean nothing less than State security was at risk, or that someone high in the Government or the Royal Family was involved."

Author Stephen Knight, in his out of print masterpiece, "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution," explains how Britain's entire political system at the end of the 19th century was threatened by the hidden facts -- Prince Albert Victor ("Eddy") was not only bisexual, but he had married a Roman Catholic girl and fathered a child with her. Evidently these debaucheries were so scandalous that the Ruling Class would not abide even the slightest hint of this revelation.

When a group of working girls (Annie Chapman, Marie Kelly, Elizabeth Stride and Mary Nichols) decided to blackmail the Royals, the Marquess of Salisbury, then Prime Minister, had to take care of the problem. He entrusted Sir William Gull, physician and abortionist to the Royal Family, for the mission.

One of the country's most prominent Freemasons, Gull understood that "Freemasonry was the power behind the Government and it was the unseen influence of the Masonic elders which dictated major policies, not the pleasing façade of Commons debate."

The deliberately engineered panic, i.e., the murder of five prostitutes, was done according to Masonic ritual. The ritual murder and disembowelment "met with such ghastly success because of the audacity with which they were executed," said Walter Sickert, Knight's informant whose painter-father had intimate knowledge of the Cleveland Street murders. This so-called "audacity" is a trademark of Masonic "mischief-making."

"Freemasons applaud violence, terror and crime, provided it is carried out in a crafty manner," writes Knight. "Humor is all important and the most appalling crimes may be committed under its cloak."

In fact, one of the key Masonic insights into human nature, says Knight, is the reaction of people to terrorism and serial ritual murders executed with great skill. In other words, people will marvel and say, "What a dirty trick, but how skillfully executed. What a swindle, but how well and with what courage it has been done."

This macabre sense of humor (or base insanity) is the trademark of Masonic Magick - to cause an effect, by an act so devilish yet cunning, that the entire world pays attention - while it's virtually terrorized and traumatized in the same collective gasp of horror.

"Ghoulish murders with a Puckish sense of fun" characterizes these atrocities.

(For example -- how could they possibly drive those planes into the towers?)

"If Masonic supremacy appears in jeopardy, it is reestablished by a show of strength, by crimes of violence, perpetrated to demonstrate the continuing power of Freemasons for the benefit of Brothers abroad," writes Knight. "Crimes of violence would have been committed to reestablishing Masonic authority in the eyes of Masons everywhere."

"All Jack the Ripper victims were dispatched according to age-old Masonic ritual," Knight continues. The mutilations of the "unfortunates" were done according to Masonic tradition, the standard way of dealing with "traitors." In fact, the oath recited by initiates promises a ghastly death and mutilation -- in the case of "betrayal."

"From Hell" actually shows a Masonic ritual of initiation, and the candidate's recited vow of promised retribution in the case of his "betrayal" sounds like a dictation from the devil himself.

It is, after all, the standard Illuminati Two Fer (Two, Two, Two for the Price of One). In this case, Number One is to eliminate the blackmailers and witnesses, the prostitutes who knew about Eddie's indiscretions. And Number Two is to instill terror in the general populace by horrific murders (and "unsolved mysteries"), which traumatize the people into deeper submission and subconscious programming.

The "deliberately engineered panic" to which Knight refers has been used historically to shift the paradigm from a scam which is about to be uncovered to a new collective "concern."

The movie "Wag the Dog," of course, illustrates this concept with unsurpassed brilliance. Divert attention from a potential scandal (the President's sexual indiscretions) to a greater potential problem (a "manufactured" war) and the entire population is once again under a "hoodwink."

As Dr. Albert Mackey, a 33rd Degree Freemason writes in "The Encyclopedia of Freemasonry," a hoodwink is "a symbol of the secrecy, silence and darkness in which the mysteries of the art should be preserved from the unhallowed gaze of the profane."

In other words, when attention is diverted even for a nanosecond, the con artist (shell game practitioner, or magician) once again confuses his mark The street-wise expression is simply "The House Always Wins."

Knight maintains that Inspector Abberline was historically part of the cover-up himself, and that the real "hero" was actually Ernest Parke, a twenty nine year old editor of the North London Press, "who pinpointed in his newspaper the deliberate mishandling of the brothel investigation and trial. He attacked the police not only for allowing one of the conspirators to escape to the Continent, but also for giving him so much time in which to do so that he managed to take his furniture with him. He attacked the court for passing a sentence of four months for Veck, who has been one of the worst offenders in an unsavory case."

Then Parke himself was charged with criminal libel in an unrelated case and sentenced to a year's imprisonment, effectively silencing him for probing much too deeply.

Though finding out that the "Jack the Ripper" murders, masterminded by Freemasons and perpetrated according to Masonic ritual, is an astonishing revelation to many people, the Whitechapel Murders are not the first to be attributed to Masonic skullduggery.

Freemason Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, who left the brotherhood in his later years, was allegedly poisoned for his "betrayal," as well as for revealing their esoteric secrets in "The Magic Flute."

William Morgan, author of a major 19th century expose of the Brotherhood called "Freemasonry Exposed," was murdered.

Film director Stanley Kubrick mysteriously died after his ritual-obsessed movie "Eyes Wide Shut" was completed.

And yes, Stephen Knight, author of "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution" mysteriously died after his best-selling expose' "The Brotherhood: The Secret World of the Freemasons" was published in 1984.

The Craft is alive and (very) well on Planet Earth.

As a fictionalized account of the Ripper killings, "From Hell" gets closer to true history than any other work of fiction -- or even so-called "history" itself. It even shows the genesis of today's voodoo science and its bizarre obsession with psycho-surgery or lobotomies as well as cut-and-burn AMA-sanctioned "medicine."

Most importantly, "From Hell" shows, in gruesome detail, the deep long-standing connection between the world's most mysterious society and the world's most mysterious murders.

Conspiracy, after all, is not just "Business-As-Usual;" it's also "Government-As-Usual."

Interview with a Vampire Freemason

Author Stephen Knight wrote one of the seminal books on freemasonry called 'The Brotherhood' in 1983. During the course of his research for this book he was introduced to a man known as 'Christopher', a mason of the highest 33rd degree ranking. In the Cafe Royal, London, Christopher showed him the papers demonstrating the authenticity of his masonic rank and told Knight that he was keen to "stop the rot" in freemasonry.

Stephen Knight asked him what a person might have to fear from a group of influential freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.

'Christopher', 33rd degree mason:

"It is not difficult to ruin a man and I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now."

Stephen Knight:

"Christopher explained that masonry's nationwide organisation of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers. Post Office staff, doctors, government employees. Bosses of firms. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were indisposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager. The 'good' mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow mason, especially a fellow lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the craft. Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be necessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.

'Christopher', the 33rd degree mason:

"Solicitors are very good at it. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him."

Stephen Knight:

"Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic DHSS and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly."

'Christopher', 33rd degree mason:

"Employers, if they are freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion. Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.

"Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them. Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's.... you see, I... you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. "There is no defence against an evil which only the victims and perpetrators know exists."

"A secretive initiation ceremony in the basement of a Long Island Masonic lodge went 'tragically wrong' when a member mistakenly pulled out a loaded weapon and fatally shot an inductee in the face, police said Tuesday. William James, 47, of Medford, N.Y., was pronounced dead at the scene of Monday night's shooting inside the Southside Masonic Lodge, said Suffolk County Detective Lt. Jack Fitzpatrick. James was participating in an induction around 8:40 p.m. at the Southside Masonic Lodge when Albert Eid, 76, of Patchogue, pulled out a gun from his pants pocket with real bullets instead of blanks and shot him, Fitzpatrick said. Eid had had a permit since 1951 for the .32-caliber handgun used in the shooting, but it was not clear why he brought it to the ceremony. A second weapon, a .22 caliber pistol with blanks, was in Eid's other pocket. The detective said both weapons are approximately the same size. Fitzpatrick told reporters at a news conference that police believe the shooting 'was completely accidental.' Police believe the Masons sat James in a chair and placed cans on a small platform around his head. Eid was standing approximately 20 feet away holding a gun, Fitzpatrick said. A third member out of James' view held a stick, and when the gun was fired the man with the stick was supposed to knock the cans off the platform to make the inductee think that real bullets were fired. Fitzpatrick said the ceremony was designed to create 'a state of anxiety' for the inductees. Police also found a guillotine, rat traps, and a wooden board that Fitzpatrick surmised was used in some type of 'walking the plank' routine in the basement of the one-story building. Eid pleaded innocent to a second-degree manslaughter charge at his arraignment before Suffolk County District Court Judge Paul Hensley in Central Islip. He was released on $2,500 bail and ordered to return to court on April 27. The shooting shone a spotlight on the Masons, a highly secretive society that traces its roots to medieval craft associations. While officials of the lodge denied that guns play a role in ceremonies, Fitzpatrick said members told police the rite involving a gun with blanks goes back at least 70 years. Mayo said James had been a member of the lodge for a few months and Eid had been a member for many years. Monday's ceremony was an initiation into the Fellow Craft, which is the second degree within the Masonic system. James worked as a map drafter and had worked for the Town of Brookhaven since 1988, said town spokeswoman Inez Birbiglia."
–ASSOCIATED PRESS, "Inductee shot dead at L.I. Masonic lodge rite - Secretive ceremony was designed to create 'a state of anxiety'," 3/9/2004 (reposted by Infowars.com - "MASONIC MURDER RITUALS, OCCULT SECRET SOCIETIES AND JACK THE RIPPER")

"That which we must say to the crowd is -- We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees -- The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay (The God of the Christians) whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil."
—General Albert Pike, Sovereign Grand Commander, Scottish Rite of Freemasony, Southern Jurisdiction, Washington DC, founder of the Top-Secret New and Reformed Palladian Rite, from the Freemason "Bible" Morals and Dogma ("A Mason's guide for daily living," 1871, page 321, of the 1942 edition)

SRMASON-SJ.ORG - Scottish Rite Journal (a/k/a The New Age Magazine) - Feb 2002 - "I WAS CALLED A SATANIST TODAY" - by Joseph W. Moss II, 32° - "Freemasons have long been accused of Satanic practices as seen in the illustration from Leo Taxil's THE MYSTERIES OF FREEMASONRY, 1897 - Source: Archives of the Supreme Council, SJ 33°, House of the Temple, Washington DC

"A few weeks ago, someone at work noticed I was wearing a Masonic ring. The few questions he had seemed to show a genuine interest in the Fraternity, and I answered him frankly. Today, I ran into him again, and he asked me if I knew what the Illuminati were. I said it was a small rationalist group founded in Germany by Adam Weishaupt in 1776. It lasted only 10 years, was modeled on Masonry, but was not a Masonic order. Aside from having a more catchy title than other, similar groups reflecting the rationalism of the Age of Enlightenment, it had little influence. He then asked me if I were an Illuminatus. Of course, I answered negatively. He had a lot of other questions, which I answered carefully, but it soon became very obvious that there was a hidden agenda behind his questions and a change in his attitude toward me. He claimed the U.S. Government was controlled by Masons, that we were trying to bring everyone into a "New World Order," [NWO is a common theme of Scottish Rite Journal] and that one of the reasons Afghanistan was fighting us was because they didn't want to become a New World Order country. The more he talked, the more conspiracies he described, and the more paranoid he appeared. According to him, even the streets in Washington, D.C., were laid out to form evil Masonic symbols; the eye on the back of the dollar bill is the eye of Satan placed there by Masons; George W. Bush is a Mason (which he's not); Bill Clinton [Blythe IV] is a Mason (wrong again [He's the highest-ranking alumnus of the Order of DeMolay for Freemason youth in USA (Bro. Peter W. Brusoe, Scottish Rite Journal, "Working for and With DeMolays", Jan/Feb 2004), named for Jacques DeMolay (ordered by the Pope and King of France to be burned at the state for Luciferian heresy as head of the Order of Knights Templar) so when he testified to Senator Bob Dole, 'I did not have sex with that woman, it depends what 'is, is,'' Dole dropped the impeachment battle, since this apparently was a signal between Masons, of code word 'ISIS', one of the Masonic Egyptian gods]), and that's why he escaped impeachment; there are hidden Degrees higher than the 33°, and Freemasons who hold these Degrees are dedicated to evil purposes, etc, etc., etc. I, too, before becoming a Mason, had heard some of these rumors. I announced that not only was I a Mason but a 32° Scottish Rite Mason, PROUD of it, and certainly not in league with Satan."
—Joseph W. Moss II, 32°, Scottish Rite Journal, Scottish Rite of Freemasonry - Southern Jurisdiction, Supreme Council 33rd Degree, The House of The Temple, Washington DC, "I Was Called A Satanist Today," February 2002

"Harold Shipman, the [Jewish] British family doctor who murdered more than 200 of his patients to become one of the worst serial killers of all time, hanged himself in his prison cell on the eve of his 58th birthday, prison officials said. A prison source, speaking on condition of anonymity said Shipman 'used a bed sheet as a ligature from the bars on his windows' in his single occupant cell to take his life. Shipman was sentenced to life imprisonment in January 2000 for the murder of 15 female patients between 1975 and 1998, and faced no prospect of parole. Two years later an inquiry concluded that he was responsible for the deaths by lethal injection of at least another 200 mostly female and elderly patients at his greater Manchester area practice. Most of Shipman's victims died suddenly without having experienced any life-threatening symptoms. Home Secretary David Blunkett ruled in June 2002 that Shipman should never be released from jail—joining a select few prisoners in Britain who have been told they would remain in prison until their dying day. In her report in July 2002, Judge Janet Smith, who chaired the inquiry into the physician who came to be known as 'Dr Death,' said Shipman may have been addicted to killing. They were, by and large, elderly women who died after being given a lethal injection, usually of morphine, while Shipman visited them in their homes. The Smith inquiry had looked into a total of 887 deaths, and it concluded that he had killed 200 people, in addition to the 15 for whom he had been convicted. It added that there was a 'real suspicion' that Shipman may have been responsible for an additional 45 deaths. 'He betrayed (patients') trust in a way and to an extent that I believe is unparalleled in history,' Smith said."
—Reuters, "Britain's worst serial killer Dr. 'Death' dies in prison," January 13, 2004

JOKES OF THE DAY

"My job was to root out and investigate police corruption, and criminals who've infiltrated the police department.... Sure I went after other policemen. After other policemen that were criminals who happened to join the police department. There were drug dealers, murderers, rapists. These are the types of policemen that I went after. The general public should know there are real, serious criminals in the police department. I don't believe that it should be hidden. Let the policemen know that someone they worked with was a murderer, or a drug dealer."
—Detective Vincent Murano, NYPD Internal Affairs, from his book and audiotape, Cop Hunter

"And they had as king over them the angel of the Abyss, whose name in Hebrew was Abaddon, and in Greek, Apollyon. (Abaddon and Apollyon mean Destroyer.)"
—Revelation 9:11, Holy Christian Bible (©NIV 666) [Why would USA name its Emergency 911 telephone service for "Satan the Destroyer"...? Why would USA name its NASA NAZI program for "Satan the Destroyer"...? Why would President George "The Texascutioner" Bush Jr, son of Sir George "Poppy" Bush Sr, Knight of the British Empire, 3rd cousin to the German Queen of England, perpetrate treason and mass murder against Americans on 9:11 (2001)...?]

"Before the time of the genocide of millions known as the Holocaust, the German government established 'euthanasia' programs for handicapped German children and adults. Organized killings of an estimated 70,000 German citizens took place at killing centers and in psychiatric institutions. At the specialized centers, children who were designated by the Reich Committee for euthanasia were killed shortly after arrival by medication or were starved to death. The children's euthanasia program in Germany during the Nazi era is reported to have had its origin in the request by a father of a deformed and retarded child to Hitler to have this child killed. Hitler asked his personal physician to investigate the situation and the child was eventually killed. In 1936-1937, a secret 'Reich Committee for the scientific registering of serious hereditary and congenital illnesses' was established in Hitler's Chancellory. This committee of three drafted a prospective law calling for the 'destruction of life unworthy of life'. Phenobarbital was mixed into the children's food every morning and night until they became unconscious and developed pneumonia. Some were also given injections of morphine and scopolamine. Killing hospitals were set up. The staff selected for killing patients who were unable to work as well as 'patients who caused extra work for the nurses, those who were deaf-mute, ill, obstructive, or undisciplined, and' anyone else who was simply annoying.' From all parts of Germany patients were abducted to be killed. Fraudulent death certificates were prepared. In some clinics, the tensions of the job were soothed by a visit to the wine cellars to mark every fiftieth killing with copious amounts of wine and cider. The doctors sometimes received a 250RM [approximately $800 US] Christmas bonus. Dr. Mootz: 'If the patients were in their right minds and could see through everything, we told them that their health condition had improved in a manner that they only would have to take a cure in order to get discharged. The patients believed us in most cases. I remember that one patient was a strict Catholic and the last day she asked for a priest to get the last sacraments. I remember very clearly and can say with absolute certainty that the priest was informed before the killing and that the patient, who at least that day was completely in her right mind, got the last sacraments from the priest. Young nurses deliberately weren't appointed to participate in the killings because we feared they couldn't be able to keep their mouths shut. The killing of a person is a hard strain on the nerves of the person doing it. It's a fact of experience that medicine doesn't taste good and people generally are not readily prepared to take medicine. The same can be said with regard to injections. Almost all of our patients were scared of injections. I proceeded with a lot of compassion. I had told patients that they would have to take a cure. They were not to be tortured more than necessary.' At the Doctors' Trial in Nuremberg, physicians were convicted of crimes against humanity. The German nurse-historian, Hilde Steppe, has written: 'We have a moral obligation to the millions of victims of National Socialism.'"
—NURSES' PARTICIPATION IN THE "EUTHANASIA" PROGRAMS OF NAZI GERMANY, The Children's Euthanasia Program [under Civil Law]

Next