DWI AUTOPSY: SATAN'S ADVOCATE

by John Lee

"All ye that be lovers call unto your remembrance the month of May, like as did Queen Guenever, for whom I make here a little mention, that while she lived she was a true lover, and therefore she had a good end."
—Sir Thomas Mallory (from Le Morte d'Arthur)

Reuter news, 11 Sept:

1859 Print: Henry VIII Receives Bible. Engraved image from the Illustrated London News, titled "Bishop Latimer Presenting a Copy of the New Testament to Henry VIII, as a New Year's Gift." Based on a drawing by John Gilbert. Psychopathic founder of the Church of England (Anglican Church in UK, Episcapalian Church in USA), who wasn't satisfied with inventing divorce, and enjoyed chopping the heads off his wives in public

Henri Paul's mother, Giselle:

"My son was not an alcoholic, he's now paying for the personalities he was driving…. Can one imagine the Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed would have agreed to get into a car driven by a drunk? Henri had the full confidence of his employer. [My son was] not depressive and was getting along perfectly. I don't need to defend him. I wish any mother could have a son like him."

There was no death certificate.

Claude Garrec, who played tennis with Paul the day of the crash:

"He didn't have the profile of an alcoholic or depressive. He always walked straight."

For chauffeur Henri Paul to have a 0.30% BAT, a level nearly requiring him to be unconscious, he would have had to have had at least twelve drinks in a one hour period (or 24 four drinks if he had eaten dinner), or at least thirteen in a two hour period, or at least fourteen in a three hour period, etc. Do you really think intelligent people like Diana and Dodi would have gotten into a car with a driver who not only could not stand up, but who probably could not even find his way to a parked car? Do you think the Fayed's would allow an alcoholic chauffeur and security director to work for them eleven years? Do you think Diana's personal bodyguard would have allowed it? Security videotape of driver Henri Paul, immediately prior to the crash, clearly does not show any intoxication. Coincidentally, a MUCH lower BAT might be much more plausible to an informed observer -- at least TEN TIMES LOWER.

Henri Paul is also alleged to have had prescription psychiatric drugs (to treat depression) in his body, yet a medical report for his flying license two days prior to the crash gave him a clean bill of health, both drug and alcohol free. His autopsy revealed no liver disease or damage whatsoever, proving he was not an alcoholic.

Security video at Ritz Carlton in Paris captures a sober Henri Paul, Dodi and Diana beginning their ride through Daley Plaza in Dallas, er, deza vu all over again. Paparazi provacateurs stalked their every move at high speed

Henri Paul had a level of poisonous carbon monoxide in his blood of 20%—potentially a fatal dose. How did this poison get into his blood if he died instantaneously of a broken neck? Why did the other passengers not have any carbon monoxide in their blood?

Henri Paul DWI autopsy:

Dr. Alan Barbour:

Blood samples drawn from heart, fluid samples from urine, eyeball and bile. Aorta ruptured. Instantaneous death (steering column stabbed chest despite airbag, as revealed in paparazzi photos). "No liver damage or signs of alcoholism." Hair analysis for past drug use allegedly showed Prozac for three months and Tiapridol for one month. "[T]he private lab under Dr. Gilbert Pepin 'mandated to do more sophisticated blood analysis' reported that Paul 'had been in a state of moderate chronic alcoholism for a minimum of one week 9the limit of the test's reliability).' This strikes me as an extraordinary statement (perhaps 'fantastic' would be a better adjective). Absent compelling evidence for the reliability of the testing (whatever it was) one must completely discount the statement, in my opinion."

"A switched blood sample? The mix of antidepressants, alcohol, and CO [carbon monoxide] 'found' in HP's [Henri Paul's] blood is typical of a suicide by exhaust gas inhalation, who are frequently depressed, taking antidepressants, and typically have a few drinks before committing suicide. Since it is very hard to explain how HP could have walked and talked normally with his blood in that state, or even walked at all, the simplest explanation is that it wasn't his blood, but that of a car-exhaust suicide, of which it [is] typical…. I honestly can't imagine how anyone can seriously claim this preposterously intoxicated blood sample came from HP. My guess is that the authorities know full well that someone must have switched the blood samples, simply because whatever fool that did it stupidly picked a preposterously intoxicated sample, but they are stuck with accepting it now as really HP's blood because to question it opens up the conspiracy can of worms…. [M]ight the syringes have been washed/stored in alcohol and reused? You would think such a thing is well-nigh impossible, but I know of a particular coroner's office where it happened…. '[G]iven the violent nature of the death, the possibility of contamination of the blood is real and must be seriously considered.' He is probably thinking of the weel-known phenomenon of a ruptured gut spilling alcohol into body cavities, where it might mix with blood from ruptured blood vessels."

The chain of evidence was broken according to doctors. It was impossible to convict Henry Paul of DWI, had he survived the 60 mph crash.

Diana: French police allege blood samplesnot 'mixed up'

By Sophie Goodchild, Home Affairs Correspondent
The Independent
11 January 2004

A senior French police officer has denied that the wrong blood sample was used in a French inquiry which concluded that Diana, Princess of Wales, was killed by a drunk driver.

Inspector Jean-Claude Mules, who played a central role in the French investigation into the crash which killed Diana and Dodi Fayed, hit back at reports that there was a mix-up over specimens taken from the chauffeur, Henri Paul.

"There was no error over the blood," said Mr Mules who is now retired but was present when the two samples were taken from Mr Paul's body. "We are very serious people and no errors are allowed."

Yesterday, Scotland Yard refused to comment on a story in a national newspaper that senior British police officers have doubts over the authenticity of Mr Paul's blood sample. It is understood there are "high-level concerns" over the specimen and that French police have not carried out a DNA test which would prove the blood came from Mr Paul.

Doubts over the validity of the blood sample would threaten the credibility of the French inquiry, which concluded Mr Paul, high on a cocktail of drink and drugs, lost control of the Mercedes car while speeding in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel.

Diana, her boyfriend Dodi Fayed, and Mr Paul died in the crash on 31 August 1997. Mr Paul's family and Dodi's father, Mohamed al-Fayed, have repeatedly drawn attention to the level of carbon monoxide in Mr Paul's sample. It was said to be so high that he would have struggled to walk, let alone drive a car.

The Harrods boss has long claimed that the blood samples were swapped by British and French intelligence agents to cover up murder. One theory is that the blood sample used in the French inquiry came from the corpse of someone poisoned by carbon monoxide, which is commonly found in car exhausts and household fires.

This latest development comes only days after inquests into the deaths of Diana and Dodi were opened and adjourned by the Coroner of the Royal Household, Michael Burgess. He has asked Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir John Stevens to look into speculation that the deaths were not the result of a "straightforward, road traffic accident".

Scotland Yard said yesterday that Sir John Stevens is expected to meet up with Mr Burgess "in the near future" to discuss the timescale of the inquiry and exactly what he wishes the Met to investigate.

A tabloid newspaper published last week a letter in which the princess claimed "my husband" was plotting to kill her. Prince Charles is understood to have met with Sir John Stevens to discuss the Met's investigation into the death of his former wife.

The full inquest into the death of Diana is not expected to begin until 2005 at the earliest, to allow the coroner time to decide which of the thousands of documents relating to the case he will make public at the inquest.

Earlier this month, this paper revealed that medical reports relating to the case surrounding the death of Diana state that she was pregnant when she died.

A senior police source in France implied that Diana's pregnancy was hushed up to spare the embarrassment of her family. It was not mentioned at the end of the two-year judicial investigation into the crash because it was not relevant to the causes of the accident or to her death.

Secret MoD plan to create spy stations

By Mark Prigg
London Evening Standard
23 October 2003

Secret plans to turn mobile phone masts into "Big Brother" spy stations have been revealed.

The new system will allow mobile phone masts to become radar spy posts in the war against terrorist attacks.

The technology works by analysing radio waves sent out by all phone masts. When these waves hit an object they are reflected to the mast.

By analysing the reflections, a picture can be built of anything nearby. The Standard has learned that the the Ministry of Defence plans a test later this month. An MoD spokesman said he was unable to comment on the project.

The system, called Celldar, is seen as a way of spotting unauthorised planes and vehicles as the Government continuesto clamp down on terrorists. The City is already on high alert, and now Government officials hope the Celldar technology could also allow them to trace the movement of individuals almost anywhere in the country. It can utilise the existing 35,000 mobile phone masts in the UK.

Paul Stein, managing director of Roke Manor Research which developed Celldar, said: "We are currently doing a lot of testing of the range and accuracy, so we cannot release those figures just yet. We are also yet to carry out testing of tracking individuals but we know we can track cars and other vehicles."

Civil liberties groups claim the technology could go too far.

Simon Davies, head of Privacy International, said: "This has profound implications for our personal privacy. I would urge the developers to conduct a full privacy assessment of this."

Big Brother spies on Britain

AFP
2003

In Britain, Big Brother really is watching you almost everywhere, according to civil liberties campaigners alarmed by the proliferation of spying machines in trains, buses, high streets, sports stadiums and perhaps soon even in clothes.

"In terms of western democracies, we are by far and away the most spied-upon nation," Mark Littleton, second in command at citizens' rights group Liberty, told AFP.

One camera for every two adults

Britain is already home to 10 percent of the entire world's close circuit television (CCTV) cameras. By 2007 it will have 25 million of them - one for every two adults in the country - Liberty says, quoting industry forecasts.

Some visitors to British shopping centres might feel reassured to know that they and fellow shoppers' movements are being tracked by CCTV.

It was thanks to a security camera that the young killers of two-year-old James Bulger in Liverpool in 1993 were traced. Bulger's horrific murder and the gruesome deaths of other children since have left a deep scar on the nation's psyche and some parents could feel less anxious knowing their offspring's movements may now be easier to trace.

But how many in the country are aware of just how often their own movements are tracked by roadside speed cameras, new travel passes and satellites?

The introduction of electronic tollgates designed to curb the number of cars coming into London's crowded streets has led to the installation of around 800 cameras to catch motorists who do not pay their daily five-pound (seven-euro, nine-dollar) "congestion charge".

Across the country there are a further 5000 police traffic radars, set up to catch overhasty drivers, and their number is increasing. At this rate, there could be more than 20 000 within 10 years, according to Edmund King, executive director of the prestigious Royal Automobile Club (RAC).

In London, the public transport service is upgrading its ticketing system, introducing electronic smartcards which it hopes will be easier to use than paper tickets, while simultaneously cutting down on fare jumpers and inspectors.

Infringements on privacy?

But civil liberties groups say the new Oyster Card could lead to infringements of privacy when it comes into effect in late 2004. The electronic chip in every card means the expected three million users can be instantly localised, every time they get on or off a bus or underground train, whether they want to be or not.

Other projects with ostensibly laudable aims will also increase surveillance of the public's movements.

In October a think tank close to the centre-left Labour government came up with a plan to better control air pollution by imposing higher taxes on motorists who use their cars in the rush hour or bottleneck zones.

It involves equipping vehicles with devices so they - and obviously their drivers - can be tracked by satellite.

Retailer have their own little plan

But one of the most insidious spying schemes is a plan Liberty says has been dreamt up by Britain's giant retailers.

The group says high street chains like Marks & Spencer and Tesco are pioneering the use of tiny microchips, which are inserted into the packaging of goods or sewn into the labels of clothes.

"Supermarket executives would love to be able to track every item of clothing we bought. It would enable them to build up customer profiles, which they would use for specific marketing campaigns," Liberty's director, Shami Chakrabarti, wrote on the association's website.

"Some customers will be comfortable with this, others will consider it a gross infringement of privacy. The important point is that the technology is too powerful to be unregulated," the trained legal advisor said.

"If anyone had told me two years ago that we would soon be in a position where it would be normal for many of us to be under 24-hour a day surveillance, I would have told them not to be ridiculous. But now it looks like happening."

Reposted by PrisonPlanet.com

JOKES OF THE DAY

"A good lawyer knows the law. A great lawyer knows the judge."
-Derrry Brownfield, GCN Radio

"Do not call conspiracy everything that these people call conspiracy; do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it. The LORD Almighty is the one you are to regard as holy, he is the one you are to fear, he is the one you are to dread, and he will be a sanctuary; but for both houses of Israel he will be a stone that causes men to stumble and a rock that makes them fall. And for the people of Jerusalem he will be a trap and a snare. Many of them will stumble; they will fall and be broken, they will be snared and captured."
—Isaiah 8:12-15, Holy Christian Bible (© NIV 666) - King James Bible and Apocrypha online ("The King James Bible will banned within 10 years." - Pastor Texe Marrs, PhD, USAF (retired), 2003)

Next